Description
In need of help with completing the attached AC7761HW document.On-site instructions: You will clearly express your thoughts about information In Marine Corps operations using the SEE-I technique. State: State in your own words the definition of information in Marine Corps operations.Elaborate: Elaborate on the information related capabilities in the information environment.Exemplify: Reflect on the past 20 years and provide three examples where information related capabilities were used to gain military advantage.Illustrate: Provide a picture, diagram, metaphor, or analogy of what the information environment looks like in your mind.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
AC7761 SEE-I RUBRIC
7500 ADVANCED SCHOOL SEMINAR PROGRAM
To ensure that quality feedback is provided to the student and a fair assessment of their performance is
given. The rubric is a guide to assist you in assessing a student’s assignment. Use this rubric as a grading
standard. The SEE-I assignment is worth 20 points, which is 2 percent of the total grade.
Unsatisfactory
Understanding
of Concepts
Analysis
Satisfactory
(80 – 89%; 3.2 – 3.5 pts)
(90 – 100%; 3.6 – 4 pts)
Discussions and
illustrations demonstrate no
understanding of few or
any of the subject issues,
theories, principles, and
concepts.
Discussions and
illustrations demonstrate
limited understanding of
few or any of the subject
issues, theories,
principles, and concepts.
Discussions and illustrations
demonstrate an
understanding of most of the
subject issues, theories,
principles, and concepts.
Discussions and
illustrations demonstrate
an in-depth understanding
of all subject issues,
theories, principles, and
concepts.
• The discussions and
illustrations break the
argument, issue, or
problem into parts;
however, the parts
identified are not correct or
some parts are missing.
• The discussions and
illustrations break the
argument, issue, or
problem into parts;
however, the parts
identified are deficient
and some parts may be
unclear.
• The discussions and
illustrations successfully
break the argument, issue, or
problem into relevant parts.
• The discussions and
illustrations successfully
break the argument, issue,
or problem into relevant
parts.
Original thoughts are
nonexistent and/or inferior.
• The links between the
parts are mostly
inaccurate.
The discussions and
illustrations are limited
in the evaluation of the
argument, issue, or
problem. It makes
incomplete
recommendations based
on bad internal evidence
or external criteria.
Original thoughts are
limited; if present, vague.
The paragraphs have
frequent mistakes in
capitalization, spelling,
abbreviations, and italics;
punctuation is often
missing.
The paragraphs have
mistakes in
capitalization, spelling,
abbreviations, and italics;
punctuation is minimal at
best.
The discussions and
illustrations do not evaluate
the argument, issue, or
problem. It fails to make
recommendations based on
bad internal evidence.
• The links between the parts
are fairly accurate.
Comments:
• The links between the
parts are clear and highly
accurate.
The discussions and
illustrations evaluate the
argument, issue, or problem
and makes acceptable
judgments based on internal
evidence or external criteria.
The discussions and
illustrations evaluate the
argument, issue, or
problem and makes
insightful judgments based
on internal evidence or
external criteria.
Original thoughts are
present, clear, and effective.
Original thoughts are fresh
and unique; it is the
synthesis of the students
experience and knowledge.
The paragraphs have limited
mistakes in capitalization,
spelling, abbreviations, and
italics; there are limited
punctuation mistakes.
The paragraphs have no
mistakes in capitalization,
spelling, abbreviations,
and italics; there are no
punctuation mistakes.
Originality
Mechanics and
Punctuation
Excellent
(70 – 79%; 2.8 – 3.1 pts)
• The links between the
parts are completely
inaccurate.
Evaluation
Needs Improvement
(0 – 69%; 0 – 2.7 pts)
Total:
Score
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
