Description
More on DBs
At the end of each unit, DB participation is assessed based on level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion. DBs allow learners to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB are accepted after the end of the unit. Learners must demonstrate an appropriate depth of understanding of course content to receive credit for having submitted substantive posts. Typically, this is achieved with 3–4 strong paragraphs for Main Posts and 2–3 strong paragraphs for Response Posts.
A female was ecstatic when hired as an oil rigger. However, after a week of working primarily with a male crew, her happiness began to deteriorate. Her male coworkers began to make unwelcome comments about her body. Specifically, a male coworker said, “Your body is like a perfect soda bottle shape, and I love your beautiful lips.” Another coworker said, “Your butt is better than any celebrity. If I get you alone one night, you will not regret it.” One morning, when she came to work, she saw a nude female picture pinned to one of the rigs, and her name was written at the bottom of the picture. She complained to the crew foreman, who then told her to talk to the site manager about it. The site manager said the following: “Let us ignore it for a while. It is just good fun. The men are testing you. You have got to fit in.”
Assignment Details
For this assignment, answer the following:
Explain what her legal rights are in this situation. What actions would you take if you were the site manager?
Share with your fellow students whether you think that she should just try to “fit in.”
In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Rubric
Discussion Board Grading Rubric – 60 Points
Assignment Criteria Proficient Descriptor Points
Quality of Main Post
24 Points Total
Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements:
Responds completely to all parts of the discussion question
Communicates content information accurately and/or logically
Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections
Connects to both key content concepts and personal experiences (if applicable)
Meets or exceeds the required length
/24 pts.
Response to Peers
20 Points Total
Responds to a minimum of two peers (10 points per response)
Substantive response
Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include:
Provides additional resources
Connects to key concepts
Shares personal or professional experiences
Contributes new information or perspective
Presents a competing viewpoint
Meets or exceeds the required length
/20 pts.
Support from Learning Resources
6 Points Total
At least one post refers to course learning resources. /6 pts.
Professional Writing
10 Points Total
Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.
Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others.
/10 pts.
Potential Deductions:
Friday Post Requirement
-6 Points Total No posts were submitted by Friday
Two Separate Days Posted
-6 Points Total Posts were not submitted on at least two separate days
Total 60 points possible /60 pts.
