Description
More on DBs
At the end of each unit, DB participation is assessed based on level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion. DBs allow learners to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB are accepted after the end of the unit. Learners must demonstrate an appropriate depth of understanding of course content to receive credit for having submitted substantive posts. Typically, this is achieved with 3–4 strong paragraphs for Main Posts and 2–3 strong paragraphs for Response Posts.
Assignment Details
A firm’s financial statements provide an extensive set of information about its financial position, performance, and cash flows, enabling analysts to gain insight into the company’s performance. The quality of each financial statement is a central element of practical financial statement analysis.
Differentiate the essential attributes of quality financial statements that can be found in the two companies chosen. Debate the pros and cons of an analysis of just one of the firms’ financial statements.
In your replies to others, share stories related to the companies discussed, and evaluate the quality of their financial statements.
In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Rubric
Discussion Board Grading Rubric – 60 Points
Assignment Criteria Proficient Descriptor Points
Quality of Main Post
24 Points Total
Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements:
Responds completely to all parts of the discussion question
Communicates content information accurately and/or logically
Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections
Connects to both key content concepts and personal experiences (if applicable)
Meets or exceeds the required length
/24 pts.
Response to Peers
20 Points Total
Responds to a minimum of two peers (10 points per response)
Substantive response
Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include:
Provides additional resources
Connects to key concepts
Shares personal or professional experiences
Contributes new information or perspective
Presents a competing viewpoint
Meets or exceeds the required length
/20 pts.
Support from Learning Resources
6 Points Total
At least one post refers to course learning resources. /6 pts.
Professional Writing
10 Points Total
Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.
Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others.
/10 pts.
Potential Deductions:
Friday Post Requirement
-6 Points Total No posts were submitted by Friday
Two Separate Days Posted
-6 Points Total Posts were not submitted on at least two separate days
Total 60 points possible /60 pts.
