Description
eproductive law is one of the most controversial issues for the Court. First, explain the significance of Roe v. Wade. Next, explain how the doctrine set out in this case allowed the Court to rule that most standards regulating abortion were unconstitutional until the early 1980s. Then discuss how and why the Court changed its views on abortion in the 1980s. Next, explicate how the decision in Casey affected what standards were acceptable regulations, and which were not. Within this answer you should draw distinctions between the different standards proposed to deal with abortion rights. Also, explain the significance of Justice O’Connor’s dissent in Akron. Finally, discuss how and why in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) the Court overruled the precedent set in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Conclude your paper with a discussion of your views on the impact the Dobbs decision may have on other civil liberties.
As always, do not solely rely on the course textbook for your information. Outside research will be necessary to ensure that you fully grasp the intricacies of the issues to assist you in forming your own knowledge-based arguments addressing the issues raised in this assignment. In accordance with APA guidelines, cite your sources within your paper as appropriate and include a Reference page.
Course book :
Epstein. L., McGuire, K. T., & Walker, T. G. (2022). Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and
Justice (11th ed.). SAGE.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
American Psychological Association.
Research Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Knowledge
20 to >15.0 pts
Expert
The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
15 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
10 to >5.0 pts
Average
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Focus
20 to >15.0 pts
Expert
The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.
15 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position.
10 to >5.0 pts
Average
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The topic is not clearly defined.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of Discussion
20 to >15.0 pts
Expert
In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper.
15 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper.
10 to >5.0 pts
Average
The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCohesiveness
20 to >15.0 pts
Expert
Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
15 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
10 to >5.0 pts
Average
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow – disjointedness is apparent. Author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
5 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar
5 to >3.0 pts
Expert
No spelling &/or grammar mistakes.
3 to >2.0 pts
Proficient
Minimal spelling &/or grammar mistakes.
2 to >0.0 pts
Average
Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes.
0 pts
Unacceptable
Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
5 to >3.0 pts
Expert
More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
3 to >2.0 pts
Proficient
5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
2 to >0.0 pts
Average
Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.
0 pts
Unacceptable
Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations
10 to >8.0 pts
Expert
Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and references list.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and references.
6 to >3.0 pts
Average
Cites some data obtained from other sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect.
3 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Does not cite sources.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
