Description
BY DAY 4 OF WEEK 7
Explain how you would adjust your teaching style and/or content based on the audiences listed below. Pay attention to how you would be mindful of others in a presentation. Think about the differences between:
Peers in this learning community
Faculty (think about your oral defense)
Colleagues at a professional conference
Colleagues at your workplace
Considering presentations as a potential best practice modality, how do you view presenting in an academic setting as similar or different from presentations at work or elsewhere?
Explain how you would accommodate for cultural diversity among your audience.
Provide supporting resources from your wider research.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). How to captivate and motivate adult learners, https://www.cdc.gov/training/development/pdfs/desi…
Note: Although this is a guide for instructors providing in-person public health training, some of the principles are applicable across various modalities.
Kilburn, M., Radu, M. B., & Henckell, M. (2019). Conceptual and theoretical frameworks for CRT pedagogy In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, & E. Ntuli (Eds.), Care and culturally responsive pedagogy in online settings (pp. 1–21). IGI Global.
Care and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy in Online Settings, by Kyei-Blankson, L.; Blankson, J.; Ntuli, E. Copyright 2019 by IGI Global. Reprinted by permission of IGI Global via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2021.
Mynbayeva, A., Sadvakassova, Z., & Akshalova, B. (2017). Pedagogy of the twenty-first century: Innovative teaching methods, In New pedagogical challenges in the 21st century – contributions of research in education. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72341
Santos, J., Figueiredo, A. S., & Vieira, M. (2019).Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review, Nurse Education Today, 72, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
University of Minnesota (2015). Adults as learners: Effective teaching strategies.https://www.leadingagemn.org/assets/docs/15_Workfo…
PUBH_8518_Module3_Discussion2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Description of criterionview longer description 4 to >3.6 ptsOutstandingFully explains how you would adjust your teaching style and/or content based on peers, faculty, colleagues at a conference, and colleagues at work paying attention to how you would be mindful of others in a presentation.3.6 to >3.2 ptsVery GoodThoroughly explains how you would adjust your teaching style and/or content based on peers, faculty, colleagues at a conference, and colleagues at work paying attention to how you would be mindful of others in a presentation.3.2 to >2.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsAdequately explains how you would adjust your teaching style and/or content based on peers, faculty, colleagues at a conference, and colleagues at work paying attention to how you would be mindful of others in a presentation.2.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsMissing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain how you would adjust your teaching style and/or content based on peers, faculty, colleagues at a conference, or colleagues at work or fails to pay attention to how you would be mindful of others in a presentation. / 4 pts
Considering presentations as a potential best practice modality, how do you view presenting in an academic setting as similar or different from presentations at work or elsewhere?view longer description 4 to >3.6 ptsOutstandingFully compare presentations in an academic setting to other types of presentations from the perspective of presentations as a potential best practice modality.3.6 to >3.2 ptsVery GoodThoroughly compare presentations in an academic setting to other types of presentations from the perspective of presentations as a potential best practice modality.3.2 to >2.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsAdequately compare presentations in an academic setting to other types of presentations from the perspective of presentations as a potential best practice modality.2.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsMissing, unoriginal, or does not adequately compare presentations in an academic setting to other types of presentations or does so from a perspective other than that of presentations as a potential best practice modality. / 4 pts
Explain how you would accommodate for cultural diversity among your audience.view longer description 4 to >3.6 ptsOutstandingFully explain how you would accommodate for cultural diversity among your audience.3.6 to >3.2 ptsVery GoodThoroughly explain how you would accommodate for cultural diversity among your audience.3.2 to >2.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsAdequately explain how you would accommodate for cultural diversity among your audience.2.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsMissing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain how you would accommodate for cultural diversity among your audience. / 4 pts
Written Communicationview longer description 4 to >3.6 ptsOutstandingDiscussion communication is fully developed and demonstrates complete understanding of doctoral writing and APA expectations as well as the rules of proper grammar, mechanics, tone, and vocabulary. It includes no spelling errors, contains cohesive paragraphs with a clear central idea, and identifies proper sources to support the post.3.6 to >3.2 ptsVery GoodDiscussion communication is generally thorough and grammatically and mechanically correct with proper tone and vocabulary and minor or no spelling errors. Post demonstrates proper doctoral and APA writing and contains mostly cohesive paragraphs with a generally clear central idea and identifies proper sources to support the post.3.2 to >2.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsDiscussion communication adequately meets expectations for doctoral and APA writing with infrequent and minor errors in grammar, mechanics, tone, and vocabulary. Contains minor to moderate spelling errors. Post contains some cohesive paragraphs with an adequately clear central idea and identifies adequate sources to support the post.2.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDiscussion communication does not meet basic expectations for doctoral or APA writing or in grammar, mechanics, tone, or vocabulary, includes several spelling errors, has noncohesive paragraphs with an unclear central idea, or does not identify proper sources to support the post. / 4 pts
Peer engagementview longer description 4 to >3.6 ptsOutstandingFully engaged discussion, posting responses to peer feedback that are strongly contributing to a meaningful, responsive, substantive, supported, and insightful dialogue that addresses the given prompts.3.6 to >3.2 ptsVery GoodGenerally thorough engagement, posting responses to peer-feedback that are meaningful, responsive, and supported dialogue with minimal concerns that address the given prompts.3.2 to >2.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsAdequately meets expectations for discussion, posting responses to peer-feedback but with infrequent and minor issues that address the given prompts.2.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not meet expectations for participation in the discussion, posting no responses to peer-feedback, and not addressing the given prompts. / 4 pts
