Description
The a-s-s-e-s-s-m-e-n-t willbe 4000 words long.Please see the questions shown in the screenshot. I will send you all the info after being hired, eg PPTs, student access etc. Please send a draft in 12hrs -1 day time, day 2, and day 3 as well. + Will need to draft some questions to ask the teacher and revise base on feedback (Send bk ard in 1 day max)
Unformatted Attachment Preview
MGMT2015 Supply Chain Management
Assessment 2 – Group Report Assignment
2023
Due date: 12 January, 2024. 11:55pm to Turnitin.
The purpose of this assessment is to:
1. Describe the theories and concepts of supply chain management and its contribution to the
future of global trade.
2. Interpret emerging trends in ethical sourcing including indigenous stakeholder perspectives
and environmental considerations within supply chains.
3. Examine issues, risks and digital systems associated with supply chain management in the
global context.
4. Plan, manage and develop for the future of supply chain management
Group Report Assignment
Identify and describe the end-to-end structure of the supply chain of any energy, agricultural or mining
commodity of your choice. Identify and discuss key processes, functions, and value adding activities in
the supply chain of your chosen commodity and industry context; such as the sourcing, storage,
transformation, processing, material handling, transportation and distribution processes of your
chosen commodity. Highlight the importance of your chosen commodity to its industrial users and
consumers, and the benefits derived from it.
Deliverable 1:
Your group will:
1. Select any energy, agricultural or mining commodity of your choice.
2. Describe and discuss the end-to-end structure of your chosen supply chain including key
processes, functions, and value adding activities in the supply chain that are peculiar to your
chosen commodity and industry context.
3. Clearly describe and discuss the processes of sourcing, storage, transformation, processing,
material handling, transportation and distribution processes of your chosen commodity.
4. Discuss the importance of your chosen commodity to its industrial users and consumers, the
utility/benefits derived from it.
• Note you do not need to provide a financial analysis. Due 12 January 2024 before 11:55pm to
Turnitin.
1
Deliverable 2:
Your group should complete a Group Process Reflection and Peer Evaluation Report in Word for each
member of your group and submit together in one Word file as a continuation and an extension of
your group report due 12 Jan. Further details will be discussed in the class.
References: All writing and illustrations must be adequately and appropriately referenced. Your report
should consist of scholarly references. All references must be from credible sources, such as journal
articles, research books, industry related journals, company documents and recent consultancy
reports such as from KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte, and Accenture.
Word Count: The report length should be 4000 words (+/- 10%), and the assignment will be submitted
through Turnitin. No appendices are required for the report.
Use the report format:
Please refer to the following link:
https://libguides.library.curtin.edu.au/uniskills/assignment-skills/writing/reports
Presentation Standard
The report submitted should comply with the following standards:
• A4 size paper
• Font Times New Roman
• Font size 12 pt for normal text
• Font size 14 pt bold for major headings, 12 pt bold for minor headings
• 1.5 line spacing
• Page numbering (centered at the bottom of each page)
• 4cm margin left of page, 2.5cm margin top, bottom and right of page
• All figures, tables, diagrams are to be consecutively numbered and appropriately labeled
Rubric: A marking rubric designed for the unit MGMT2015 is uploaded alongside this brief in
Blackboard.
2
Peer review report and reflection
Each group should consolidate their peer evaluation Word files
together with their group report into a single Word file and submit at
Turnitin on 12 January 2024 before 11:55pm
Your reflection on your peer/team member(s)
Personal reflection on what you have done for this assignment and how you have contributed
This assessment is targeting the following aspects of Curtin’s Graduate Attributes and values:
• Collaborative Team Working including Effective Communications and Conflict Management Skills
• Negotiation and Flexibility
• Critical and Creative Thinking Skills
• Applied Discipline Knowledge and Skills
• Integrity and Excellence
This evaluation is designed to encourage you to think about and understand how well you and your team
member(s) performed the team activity in order for you to develop the important skills above.
Research indicates that students who reflect on their own performance have more control over future
performance of targeted skill(s), and are better able to articulate their progress. Such students also
demonstrate increased self-confidence in a range of situations.
Note: the lecturer grade is where the lecturer rewards effort, contribution, performance and leadership capacity
of an individual based on the basis of an individual’s contribution. However, all students have the opportunity
to receive the full complement of marks available in this component of the assessment task if a student has
clearly demonstrated superior commitment, contribution and performance to the functioning and
processes of the group as well as the group outcome (i.e. the final report submitted).
As this is an assessable task you need to understand/follow the instructions:
1. These evaluation forms are confidential and enable the lecturer to secure an insight into how well the
team/group process functioned and who contributed what in order to track your individual
contribution. Please complete this evaluation of yourself and your group member(s) (peers)
honestly and submit through Blackboard Peer Evaluation, as a PDF document.
2. Ensure you put your name on the Self/Peer Evaluation Schedule (A) and your group member’s
name on the Peer Evaluation Schedule (B), (C) and (D).
3. Your Lecturer will read your group’s work and identify how well the group functioned and who did what
and who did not do what. This feedback will also help the lecturer to reflect and decide whether s/he
needs to make any updates to the activity in future.
4. Please Note: This is your opportunity to tell the lecturer if there were any problems with the group
interactions, division of workload etc. Hence, please be honest. Even if your group did not function
well, you have the capacity to earn the individual marks if you have made every effort to complete
the assignment well.
5. Your feedback in this evaluation exercise would be collated and read together with those of your
peer/group member and graded according to the grading rubric and the insights provided about
what you learned from this experience, the quality of your contribution and the submitted report.
Assessment 2
Team working Skills – Tracking individual workload Assessment
Self/Peer Evaluation Schedule (A)
Note to students: – Bullet points in the first column should be answered in terms of … “What did I do ….?”
Aspects of Team Working
Self-Reflective Comments for:
(write your name here)
Student ID:
Individual Roles and
Responsibilities
• What roles/activities did you
undertake in this assignment?
(e.g., researcher, editor, sequencing data, draft writer,
collation of materials)
• Explain how your contribution
to the group made a difference to
the final product?
Generating and Creating
Ideas/Strategies
• Did I contribute original/new
ideas? Cite examples.
• Synergy – How well did I build
on the ideas of others to produce
a superior outcome? Cite examples.
Research
• Did I undertake an equal share?
• Was my information accurate
and in my own words/not
plagiarised directly off the web?
• Was my information up-to-date?
-from credible sources e.g. journals, texts, conference
papers etc.?
Collegiality
• What did I do to support our
discussions positively?
• What did I do to mediate
potential conflict?
What is your attitude to working with your partner? Has
it been OK, if not, why not? And what have you done
about it?
Organisational skills:
• Did I make it to all team
meetings on time?
• What are my time management
skills like?
• How well did I work to the
timeline?
– did you get your materials to each other on time?
– did you make it to the meetings on time? etc.
Final Outcome/Product
• Discuss how your contribution
increased the quality of the final
assignment.
• How relevant is your assignment
to real life?
Self-reflection comments:
1. What did I learn from this group activity (in terms of the process of working in teams – not content/information)?
2. What would I need to change for further develop about how I worked with my partner in order to make future
team activities more successful?
3. List 3 strengths you have in team working and 2 weaknesses that you need to continue to improve.
1
Team Member 1/ Peer Evaluation Schedule (B)
Aspects of Team Working
Peer-Reflective Comments for:
(Write your partner’s name here)
Student ID:
Individual Roles and
Responsibilities
• What roles/activities did she/he
undertake in this assignment?
(e.g., researcher, editor, sequencing data, draft writer,
collation of materials)
• Explain how his/her
contribution to the group made a
difference to the final product?
Generating and Creating
Ideas/Strategies
• Did
he/she
contribute
original/new ideas? Cite examples.
• Synergy – How well did he/she
build on your ideas to produce a
superior outcome? Cite examples.
Research
• Did he/she undertake an equal
share?
• Was his/her information
accurate and paraphrased/not
plagiarised directly off the web?
• Was his/her information up-todate? -from credible sources e.g. journals, texts,
conference papers etc.?
Collegiality
• What did he/she do to support
our discussions positively?
• What did he/she do to mediate
potential conflict?
What is your attitude to working with your partner? Has
it been OK, if not, why not? And what have you done
about it?
Organisational skills:
• Did he/she make it to all team
meetings on time?
• What are his/her time
management skills like?
• How well did he/she work to
the timeline?
– were material received on time?
– did he/she make it to the meetings on time? etc.
Final Outcome/Product
• Discuss how his/her
contribution increased the
quality of the final assignment.
Other comments about your partner:
List 3 strengths and 2 weaknesses that you have identified in your partner from this team working assignment.
2
Team Member 2 /Peer Evaluation Schedule (C)
Aspects of Team Working
Peer-Reflective Comments for:
(write your partner’s name here)
Student ID:
Individual Roles and
Responsibilities
• What roles/activities did she/he
undertake in this assignment?
(e.g., researcher, editor, sequencing data, draft writer,
collation of materials)
• Explain how his/her
contribution to the group made a
difference to the final product?
Generating and Creating
Ideas/Strategies
• Did
he/she
contribute
original/new ideas? Cite examples.
• Synergy – How well did he/she
build on your ideas to produce a
superior outcome? Cite examples.
Research
• Did he/she undertake an equal
share?
• Was his/her information
accurate and paraphrased/not
plagiarised directly off the web?
• Was his/her information up-todate? -from credible sources e.g. journals, texts,
conference papers etc.?
Collegiality
• What did he/she do to support
our discussions positively?
• What did he/she do to mediate
potential conflict?
What is your attitude to working with your partner? Has
it been OK, if not, why not? And what have you done
about it?
Organisational skills:
• Did he/she make it to all team
meetings on time?
• What are his/her time
management skills like?
• How well did he/she work to
the timeline?
– were material received on time?
– did he/she make it to the meetings on time? etc.
Final Outcome/Product
• Discuss how his/her
contribution increased the
quality of the final assignment.
Other comments about your partner:
List 3 strengths and 2 weaknesses that you have identified in your partner from this team working assignment.
3
Team Member 3 /Peer Evaluation Schedule (D)
Aspects of Team Working
Peer-Reflective Comments for:
(write your partner’s name here)
Student ID:
Individual Roles and
Responsibilities
• What roles/activities did she/he
undertake in this assignment?
(e.g., researcher, editor, sequencing data, draft writer,
collation of materials)
• Explain how his/her
contribution to the group made a
difference to the final product?
Generating and Creating
Ideas/Strategies
• Did
he/she
contribute
original/new ideas? Cite examples.
• Synergy – How well did he/she
build on your ideas to produce a
superior outcome? Cite examples.
Research
• Did he/she undertake an equal
share?
• Was his/her information
accurate and paraphrased/not
plagiarised directly off the web?
• Was his/her information up-todate? -from credible sources e.g. journals, texts,
conference papers etc.?
Collegiality
• What did he/she do to support
our discussions positively?
• What did he/she do to mediate
potential conflict?
What is your attitude to working with your partner? Has
it been OK, if not, why not? And what have you done
about it?
Organisational skills:
• Did he/she make it to all team
meetings on time?
• What are his/her time
management skills like?
• How well did he/she work to
the timeline?
– were material received on time?
– did he/she make it to the meetings on time? etc.
Final Outcome/Product
• Discuss how his/her
contribution increased the
quality of the final assignment.
Other comments about your partner:
List 3 strengths and 2 weaknesses that you have identified in your partner from this team working assignment.
4
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
