Description
i need statistics from the ons with calculations including mean, average, standard deviation and sum. then moved into word document with citing and referencing of articles that support such statistic. an example is provided of how it should be and the assignment material and explanation are attached as well. no set word count. yo do not have to include all statistics found on the ONS, pick and old and a new date and compare.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Assessment Task Information (In-College & Remote delivery)
Key details:
Assessment Instructions
What do you need to do for this assessment?
Task:
You are required to complete a written Statistical Investigation, which will involve researching a topic and question
of your choice. You will introduce the topic by providing a historical or theoretical background and your will explain
how the research question will be answered. You will collect data by either primary or secondary methods or both
and descriptively analyse the data by use of calculations and graphs. You will complete a written analysis of the
data, which will inform your conclusion. Any sources used will be referenced and examples of raw data will be
included in an Appendices section.
Your tutor will provide ideas for research topics if required and support and feedback over a number of weeks.
You must submit the Statistical Investigation on the VLE and via Turnitin by a set day and time.
Guidance:
For this assessment you should make use of the following formative activities that you have already completed.
These activities have been designed to support this summative assessment:
•
In-class and homework assignments on Graphical representation, Measures of Spread and Location (e.g.,
mean, standard deviation, range), Correlation, Regression, Time series and trendlines.14
Structure:
The Statistical Investigation will be typed as a Word document, with sections and subheadings. Any graphs created
using software such as Excel will be inserted into the Word document.
Your report should be divided into the following sections.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Title page
Introduction
Methodology
Calculations and Graphs
Analysis of data
Conclusion
References
Appendices (if appropriate)
Theory and/or task resources required for the assessment:
You may use your textbook, notes, PowerPoints etc. You will use a variety of academic sources from which you will
collect data. Your work and ideas must be your own and/or correctly referenced.
Referencing style:
You should refer to a minimum of 4 relevant sources for your report.
You must include a Harvard style reference list at the end of your report.
Expected word count:
You must include all of the recommended sections but there is no set word count
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
1.
2.
Use descriptive statistical methods to analyse data using a relevant software package and interpret the
outcomes in relation to context
Accurately present data in visual form (tables, graphs and charts), using appropriate software
| Kaplan International Pathways
| 1
| kaplanpathways.com
3.
Understand and apply statistical theory to gather, process and present data accurately using a range of
techniques appropriate to their field of study
Critically assess descriptive, predictive and visual statistics from a range of sources with reference to
statistical theory best practice
4.
How will this assessment be marked?
The assessment will be marked using the following areas and weightings:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Use of Research methodology
Presentation of data in visual form
Use of Mathematical techniques
Critical interpretation of results
Presentation of written data
Academic Integrity
20%
20%
20%
20%
15%
5%
You will receive a % mark in each of these categories. The overall mark will be a percentage (0-100%).
| Kaplan International Pathways
| 2
| kaplanpathways.com
Module code: FC301
Group: A20 RA
Module title: Statistics
Assessment type: Statistical Investigation
Assignment title:
“Homicide in England and Wales from 2009 to 2019.”
Module tutor name: Shefiu Zakariyah
Student name:
Student ID number:
Date of submission: 01/03/2021
Word count: 1701
I confirm that this assignment is my own work.
Where I have referred to academic sources, I have provided in-text citations and included the
sources in the final reference list.
Introduction
Homicide is defined a person who killed another person. It is a general term that comprises of
murder and manslaughter. Murder is described as unlawfully killing someone and it is not done
as a form of self-protection. Manslaughter on the other hand can be described as lawful killing
and can be sub-divided into 2 groups, voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. Voluntary
manslaughter is a crime based on one’s emotions leading to another person’s death.
Unvoluntary manslaughter is defined as killing one due to the another’s inattention and
carelessness (Stein & Markus law, 2020). Although has decreased significantly over the years
around the world, this is still an important issue that needs to continue its efforts in decreasing
the number homicides occurring. Each homicide is said to cost over €3 million for the country
(Morgan, et.al, 2020). This can affect the country’s economic, political and social stability if not
dealt with urgently. There are many reasons for one to commit a homicide such as financial
instability and racial tension (WHO, 2015). Therefore, homicide is an issue that needs to be
dealt with urgency. Having established the importance of homicide, this report aims to
investigate the number of suspects, victims and the methods used in the killings. In this report,
the methodology, calculations and graph, analysis of the data and conclusion will be discussed.
Methodology
The data presented is taken from the ONS website (ONS, 2020). The data used in this report is
both quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative data, comparing the different age groups of
both victims and suspects each year from 2009 till 2019, is collected through observation. The
qualitative data, comparing the different methods of killing each year from 2009 till 2019, is also
collected through observation. Researchers also can gain access to this information from the
Home Office Homicide Index which consist of specific information on every homicide case in
England and Wales. The source of the data is from a governmental organisation. This would
most likely be reliable information and would not be bias to favour any groups of the society.
Calculations and Graphs
Table 1:
Table 1: Suspects convicted of homicide by age, year beginning April 2009 to year ending March
2019 in England and Wales
Age group of suspects Under
162535455565Above
Total
16
24
34
44
54
64
74
75
April 2009 – March
18
218
155
77
53
13
5
1
540
2010
April 2010 – March
12
167
154
99
68
15
9
5
529
2011
April 2011 – March
8
180
124
88
49
18
5
2
474
2012
April 2012 – March
11
144
147
86
53
21
2
3
467
2013
April 2013 – March
11
209
130
97
58
20
2
4
531
2014
April 2014 – March
13
110
114
73
57
14
7
2
390
2015
April 2015 – March
3
127
108
76
53
12
4
2
385
2016
April 2016 – March
14
146
111
84
35
19
1
1
411
2017
April 2017 – March
13
140
92
64
37
14
4
0
364
2018
April 2018 – March
10
89
60
46
30
6
6
3
250
2019
Total Percentage / % 2.6
35.2
27.5
18.2
11.4
3.5
1.04 0.53
100
Total
113
1530
1195
790
493
152
45
23
Mean
11.3
153
119.5 79
49.3
15.2
4.5
2.3
Maximum
18
218
155
99
68
21
9
5
Minimum
3
89
60
46
30
6
1
0
Range
15
129
95
53
38
15
8
5
Standard deviation
3.74
38.99 28.05 14.97 11.20 4.26
2.33
1.42
4341
Line Graph 1:
Suspects convicted of homicide in England and Wales
Number of suspects
250
200
150
100
50
0
April 2009 April 2010 April 2011 April 2012 April 2013 April 2014 April 2015 April 2016 April 2017 April 2018
– March – March – March – March – March – March – March – March – March – March
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Months
Under 16
16-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
Pie Chart 1:
Total percentage of suspects convicted of homicide in
England and Wales
3.5%
1.04%
0.53% 2.6%
11.4%
35.2%
18.2%
27.5%
Under 16
16-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
Above 75
Above 75
Table 2:
Table 2: All victims from homicide by age, year beginning April 2009 to year ending March 2019 in
England and Wales
Age group of all
Under 1-4 5 1625354555- 65- Above Total
victims
1
15
24
34
44
54
64
74
75
April 2009 – March 20
16
10
111
119
123
82
56
22
36
595
2010
April 2010 – March 17
16
23
105
123
134
88
59
32
35
632
2011
April 2011 – March 14
18
14
98
109
113
64
42
21
32
525
2012
April 2012 – March 22
22
23
87
97
100
88
43
31
31
544
2013
April 2013 – March 16
17
11
95
95
91
80
47
29
37
518
2014
April 2014 – March 24
13
16
87
75
90
85
46
30
42
508
2015
April 2015 – March 12
7
14
86
101
101
103
50
32
39
545
2016
April 2016 – March 22
12
30
151
132
121
92
55
24
36
675
2017
April 2017 – March 17
15
33
148
138
116
103
58
37
39
704
2018
April 2018 – March 29
19
19
113
136
107
107
48
38
54
670
2019
Total percentage 3.26
2.62 3.26 18.3
19
18.5
15.1
8.52 5
6.44
100
/%
Total
193
155 193 1081 1125 1096 892
504 296 381
5916
Mean
19.3
15.5 19.3 108.1 112.5 109.6 89.2
50.4 29.6 38.1
Maximum
29
22
33
151
138
134
107
59
38
54
Minimum
12
7
10
86
75
90
64
42
21
31
Range
17
15
23
65
63
44
43
17
17
23
Standard
deviation
4.84
3.93 7.43 22.64 19.58 13.64 12.24 5.89 5.50 6.14
Line Graph 2:
Victims of homicide in England and Wales
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
April 2009 – April 2010 – April 2011 – April 2012 – April 2013 – April 2014 – April 2015 – April 2016 – April 2017 – April 2018 March 2010 March 2011 March 2012 March 2013 March 2014 March 2015 March 2016 March 2017 March 2018 March 2019
Under 1
1-4 y
5 -15 y
16-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
Above 75
Pie Chart 2
Total percentage of victims of homicide in England and
Wales
3.26%
2.62%
3.26%
6.44%
5.00%
8.52%
18.30%
15.10%
19.00%
18.50%
Under 1
1-4 y
5-15 y
16-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
Above 75
Table 3:
Table 7: Methods of homicide killing by age, year beginning April 2009 to year ending March
2019 in England and Wales
Method
Sharp
Blunt
Hittin Strangulati Shooti Pois Moto Othe Tot
of killing
instrume instrume g,
on, etc.
ng
on or r
rs
al
nts
nts
kickin
drug vehic
g,
s
le
etc.
April
210
49
126
53
41
15
18
57
569
2009 March
2010
April
236
61
118
61
60
20
7
52
615
2010 March
2011
April
209
51
89
60
40
8
5
47
509
2011 March
2012
April
2012 March
2013
April
2013 March
2014
April
2014 March
2015
April
2015 March
2016
April
2016 March
2017
April
2017 March
2018
April
2018 March
2019
Total
Percenta
ge
Total
195
49
105
41
29
9
6
74
508
204
38
102
52
28
14
9
51
498
186
42
93
52
21
26
9
53
482
211
45
100
50
24
19
8
60
517
214
48
111
134
32
15
22
63
639
282
36
104
52
28
22
17
115
656
259
36
106
56
32
15
12
85
601
39.4
8.13
18.8
10.9
5.99
2.91
2.02
11.7
100
2206
455
1054
611
335
163
113
657
559
4
Mean
Maximu
m
Minimum
Range
Standard
deviation
221
282
45.5
61
105
126
61.1
134
33.5
60
16.3
26
11.3
22
65.7
115
186
96
28.3
36
25
7.42
89
37
10.4
41
93
24.9
21
39
10.6
8
18
5.29
5
17
5.48
47
68
19.8
Pie Chart 3
Total percentage of victims killed by different methods
2.02%
11.70%
2.91%
39.40%
5.99%
10.90%
18.80%
8.13%
Sharp instruments
Blunt instruments
Hitting, kicking, etc.
Strangulation, etc.
Shooting
Poison or drugs
Motor vehicle
Others
Analysis of data
1. Which age group has the highest and lowest number of suspects convicted of homicide
in England and Wales from 2009 to 2019?
According to Table 1, the 16-24 age group have the highest number of suspects
convicted with 1530 out of 4341 suspects (ONS, 2020). They have the highest number
of suspects as they are young adults that may be facing pressures from society and the
people around them which may result in them making wrong judgements and decisions.
The mean among that age group is also the highest with the value of 153. This is not a
good form of comparison as the standard deviation is the highest with the value of 38.99
(ONS, 2020). This means that the data value is widely spread which makes the data less
reliable. In Line Graph 1, it is shown that 16-24 age group has the highest number of
suspects throughout almost every year from 2009 till 2019. There are 2 exceptions in
April 2012 – March 2013 and April 2014 – March 2015 where the 25-34 age group is
higher than the 16-24 age group. The greatest increase in the number of suspects
happens in the 16-24 age group from April 2012 – March 2013 to April 2013 – March
2014. According to Pie Chart 1, the 16-24 age group has the highest percentage of
suspects convicted in England and Wales with 35.2% (ONS, 2020).
According to Table 1, the above 75 age group has the lowest number of suspects with
only 23 out of 4341 suspects (ONS, 2020). The above 75 age group have the lowest
range with the value of 5 and had 0 suspects in April 2017 – March 2018. In Pie Chart 1,
it shows that the lowest total percentage of suspects convicted of homicide in England
Wales is only 0.53% which is the data for the above 75 age group (ONS, 2020). The
above 75 age group have the least number of suspects for homicide cases which may
be because there are not many people that are categorised into that age group and do
not have a very long-life expectancy to live till above 75 years.
2. Which age group has the highest and lowest number of victims that died due to homicide
in England and Wales from 2009 to 2019?
According to Table 2, the 25-34 age group has the highest number of victims that died
due to homicide with 1125 victims. The mean is also the highest value with 112.5 of that
age group. The mean could be used as a basis of comparison as the standard deviation
is not the highest value, 19.58, even though the mean is highest (ONS, 2020). This
suggest that the data is closely surrounded around the mean which makes the data
more reliable. Although the 25-34 age group has the highest number of victims, they do
not the highest value of victims. Their maximum value is only 138 while the 16-24 age
group possess the highest value of 151. In Line Graph 2, it shows that from April 2009 –
March 2010 to April 2012 – March 2013, the 35-44 age group has the highest number of
victims. The greatest increase in the numbers is from April 2015 – March 2016 to April
2016 – March 2017 where the number increased from 86 to 151 for the 16-25 age group
(ONS, 2020). This is calculated to be a 75.6% increase which shows the steep and
sudden increase. In Pie Chart 2, the total percentage of victims of homicide in England
and Wales is the highest for the 25-34 age group with 19.00% (ONS, 2020). The
difference between the highest percentage and the next highest percentage is calculated
to be only 0.5%. The 25-34 age group has the highest number victims which may be due
to their surrounding situations. They may be more susceptible to the dangers that come
with it entering the working world.
According to ONS (2020), it is recorded in Table 2 where the lowest number of victims is
the 1-4 age group with 155 victims. The range of the age group is 15 with the minimum
value of 7 which is the lowest number of victims among all the age groups and the only
single digit value present in the data. Both under 1 and 5-15 age groups are coming by a
close second last with both having 193 victims. Although they both have the same total
value, they do not have the same standard deviation value. The under 1 age group has
the value of 4.84 while for the 5-15 age group, it has a higher value of 7.43 for its
standard deviation. This means that the under 1 age group has more clustered data
values which makes it more reliable than the values of 5-15 age group. In Line Graph 2,
it shows that from April 2014 – March 2015 to April 2018 – March 2019 the 1-4 age
group has the lowest values among all the other age groups. In Pie Chart 2, it
emphasises the point that the 1-4 age group has the lowest percentage of victims due to
homicide with 2.62%.
3. Which is the most and least common method of killing used by suspects of homicide in
England and Wales from 2009 to 2019?
According to Table 3, sharp instruments is the most used tool used by suspects with
2206 out of 5594 victims (ONS, 2020). Both the maximum (282) and the minimum (186)
value under sharp instruments is much higher than all the values of the other methods of
homicide. There may be a huge number of suspects that use sharp instruments as their
method of killing as the tools such as knife and scissors are very easily accessible and
can easily cause very serious harm to the victims when used. The mean and standard
deviation is also the highest for sharp instruments at 221 and 28.3 respectively. Since
the standard deviation is high, the data may not be as trustworthy as the spread of the
data is very wide as compared to other methods of killing. In Pie Chart 3, it shows that
sharp instruments have the highest percentage of 39.40% (ONS, 2020). This value is
more than double than the second highest percentage of 18.80% which is hitting, kicking
etc.
According to Table 3, the least common method of killing is motor vehicular killing with
113 victims. There is a huge difference with the most common method of killing which is
calculated to be 2093. The mean is 2.02 which is the lowest among all the other
methods and the standard deviation is also the lowest at 5.48 (ONS, 2020). In Pie Chart
3, motor vehicular has the lowest percentage of 2.02% (ONS, 2020). Although the
standard deviation is low, the data is not reliable as there are other method of killings
that are placed under others which may have different methods that are much lower than
the motor vehicular method. Therefore, motor vehicular may not be the least common
method of killing but using data presented in Table 3 and Pie Chart 3, motor vehicular is
the least used method of killing victims by suspects.
Conclusion
To sum up, this report has summarised the data collected from the ONS website by
using tables and used graphs and charts to present the data. A brief introduction was
given about a background on the homicide cases in England and Wales from 2009 to
2019. There were 3 questions that were asked and answered in this report to relate the
data shown to the question.
It was found that the age group with the highest number of suspects is the 16-24 age
group while the highest number of victims is the 25-34 age group. The age group that
has the least number of suspects is the above 75 age group while the least number of
victims is the 1-4 age group. The most common method of killing is using sharp
instruments while the least common method is using motor vehicular. This report could
be improved if in the future if more years are used as comparison to see the trend more
clearly.
Reference
1. Morgan, N., Shaw, O., Mailley, R., Channing, R., Sweiry, A., Kruithof, K., Bloom, J.,
Kent, A., Smith, K., and Romaniuk, A. (2020). Trends and driver of homicide. Retrieved
on 20 February 2021.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment
_data/file/870188/trends-and-drivers-of-homicide-main-findings-horr113.pdf
2. ONS. (2020). Homicide in England and Wales: year ending March 2019. Retrieved on
15 February 2021.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/homicid
einenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2019#quality-and-methodology
3. Stein and Markus law. (2020). What’s the difference between homicide, murder, and
manslaughter? Retrieved on 20 February 2021.
https://www.steinandmarkuslaw.com/whats-the-difference-between-homicide-murderand-manslaughter/
4. WHO. (2015). Homicide: WHO Global Health Estimates. Retrieved on 28 February
2021.
https://apps.who.int/violenceinfo/homicide/#:~:text=Homicide%20is%20caused%20by%20mix,to%20have%20higher
%20homicide%20rates.
Nature of violent crime, year ending March 2022
Information
Useful links
Data tables shown in this workbook relate to the Telephone – operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW) and police recorded
crime.
Not all tables typically published within this suite have been able to be created on the TCSEW data. These tables have been flagged in their
associated tabs. Please refer to last year’s release for the latest data
For dates of future publications please see the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Release Calendar
ONS Release Calendar
For explanatory notes on these statistics see the User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales: Measuring crime during the
Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Detailed notes on police recorded crime revisions policy is in section 3 of the User Guide.
User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales: Measuring crime
during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
Following a methodological change to the handling of repeat victimisation in the CSEW, these data are not comparable with data published
before January 2019. For more information see ‘Improving victimisation estimates derived from the Crime Survey for England and Wales’
Improving victimisation estimates derived from the Crime Survey for
England and Wales’
For further information about the Crime Survey for England and Wales and police recorded crime statistics, please email
[email protected]
[email protected]
or write to: ONS Centre for Crime and Justice, Office for National Statistics, Room 2200, Segensworth Road, Titchfield, PO15 5RR
Statistical contact: Pete Jones
Tel: +44(0) 7592 8695
email: [email protected]
Table of contents
Table number
Table title
Table 1
Prevalence of violence, by type of violence and personal characteristics, adults aged 18 and over, percentage victim once or
more
Table 2
Prevalence of violence, by type of violence and household and area characteristics, adults aged 18 and over, percentage
victim once or more
Table 3
Prevalence of violence, by victim-offender relationship and personal characteristics, adults aged 18 and over, percentage
victim once or more
Table 4
Prevalence of violence, by victim-offender relationship and household and area characteristics, adults aged 18 and over,
percentage victim once or more
Not available Table 5
Timing of violent incidents, by whether the incident was alcohol-related
Not available Table 6
Location of violent incidents, by whether the incident was alcohol-related
Not available Table 7
Whether violent incidents were alcohol-related, by offender characteristics
Not available Table 8
Trends in number of multiple victimisation incidents and victimisation for total violence
Table 9
Proportion of violence against the person and sexual offences, by sex of victim, police recorded crime (37 forces)
Table 10
Proportion of violence against the person offences, by age and sex of victim, police recorded crime (31 forces)
Table 11
Police recorded violence against the person offences with ‘other’ victim-suspect relationship where known, by sex of victim
and type of relationship, police recorded crime (18 forces)
Table 12
Proportion of selected violence against the person offences recorded by the police which were ‘alcohol-related’, police
recorded crime (35 forces)
Table link
Link to Table 1
Link to Table 2
Link to Table 3
Link to Table 4
Link to Table 5
Link to Table 6
Link to Table 7
Link to Table 8
Link to Table 9
Link to Table 10
Link to Table 11
Link to Table 12
Notes
This worksheet contains one table.
Note number
Note text
Useful links
1
See Section 6 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales: Measuring crime during
the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic for definitions of personal characteristics.
User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales: Measuring crime
during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
2
Some indicators have not been collected in the TCSEW so demographics presented may differ to
previous years.
3
‘All violence’ includes wounding, assault with minor injury and assault without injury. See Section
5.1 of the User Guide for more information.
4
Bases refer to all violence; other bases will be similar.
5
Data for this indicator were collected from the respondent’s initial face-to-face CSEW interview. For User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales: Measuring crime
more information see section 6 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales:
during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
Measuring crime during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
6
The definition of disability used is consistent with the core definition of disability under the Equality
Act 2010. A person is considered to have a disability if they have a long-standing illness, disability
or impairment which causes difficulty with day-to-day activities.
7
The terminology used to label these data has been changed to ‘sexual orientation’ from ‘sexual
identity’ to align with terminology used in legislation (Equality Act 2010). Sexual Orientation is an
umbrella concept which encompasses sexual identity, attraction and behaviour. This question
described within this principle is based on a substantial body of research and is designed to capture
self-perceived Sexual Identity. An individual could respond differently to questions on either sexual
Table 1: Prevalence of violence, by type of violence and personal characteristics, adults aged 18 and over, percentage victim once or more [note 1, 2]
Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW), year ending March 2022
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the notes worksheet.
These data are published as Experimental Statistics, which are in the testing phase and not yet fully developed.
Some shorthand is used in this table: [x] indicates that a number is unavailable.
Link to Notes page
Link to contents page
Source: Office for National Statistics – Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales
All violence (%)
[note 3]
Violence with
injury (%)
Wounding (%)
Assault with minor
injury (%)
Violence without
injury (%)
Unweighted base number of interviews
[note 4]
All adults
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75+
1.9
3.0
2.9
1.9
2.5
1.6
0.6
0.2
0.6
1.0
1.0
0.4
0.9
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.4
1.0
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.0
0.1
1.4
2.0
2.3
1.5
1.6
1.1
0.5
0.2
31,204
414
1,918
3,288
4,423
6,580
8,249
6,332
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male 18-24
Male 25-34
Male 35-44
Male 45-54
Male 55-64
Male 65-74
Male 75+
2.2
4.5
2.8
2.9
2.5
1.4
0.8
0.3
0.6
2.0
0.8
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.5
2.0
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
2.5
2.4
2.5
1.9
1.2
0.7
0.3
14,615
199
870
1,462
2,066
2,997
3,992
3,029
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female 18-24
Female 25-34
Female 35-44
Female 45-54
Female 55-64
Female 65-74
Female 75+
1.6
1.5
3.0
0.9
2.4
1.8
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.0
1.2
0.3
1.1
0.8
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.6
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.8
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.0
0.1
1.1
1.5
2.2
0.6
1.4
1.1
0.4
0.1
16,589
215
1,048
1,826
2,357
3,583
4,257
3,303
Born in the UK [note 5]
Born in the UK [note 5]
Born in the UK
Not born in the UK
1.9
1.8
0.6
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.5
1.4
1.1
28,319
2,879
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Married/civil partnered
Cohabiting
Single
Separated
Divorced/legally dissolved partnership
Widowed
1.0
1.9
3.7
4.4
2.8
0.7
0.4
0.4
1.1
2.0
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.0
0.3
0.3
1.0
1.2
0.3
0.1
0.6
1.6
2.8
3.3
2.2
0.5
16,167
2,573
4,378
586
3,623
3,865
Disability [note 6]
Disability [note 6]
Disabled
Not disabled
2.5
1.7
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.6
0.4
2.0
1.2
7,100
23,979
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
Heterosexual/straight
Gay/Lesbian
Bisexual
Other
1.9
5.4
5.1
[x]
0.6
1.4
0.7
[x]
0.2
0.0
0.0
[x]
0.5
1.4
0.7
[x]
1.4
4.0
5.1
[x]
24,553
374
354
98
Personal characteristics
Personal characteristics
breakdown
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
Table 2: Prevalence of violence, by type of violence and household and area characteristics, a
Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW), year ending March 2022
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the notes worksheet.
These data are published as Experimental Statistics, which are in the testing phase and not yet fully develope
Some shorthand is used in this table: [x] indicates that a number is unavailable.
Link to Notes page
Link to contents page
Source: Office for National Statistics – Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales
Household/area characteristcs
Structure of household
Structure of household
Structure of household
Tenure
Tenure
Tenure
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Output area classification
Output area classification
Output area classification
Output area classification
Output area classification
Output area classification
Output area classification
Output area classification
Area type
Area type
Employment deprivation index
Employment deprivation index
Employment deprivation index
Welsh Employment deprivation index
Welsh Employment deprivation index
Welsh Employment deprivation index
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
ence, by type of violence and household and area characteristics, adults aged 18 and over, percentage victim
urvey for England and Wales (TCSEW), year ending March 2022
ble. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the notes worksheet.
perimental Statistics, which are in the testing phase and not yet fully developed.
table: [x] indicates that a number is unavailable.
stics – Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales
Household/area characteristics
breakdown
All violence (%)
[note 3]
Violence with
injury (%)
Single adult and child(ren)
Adults and child(ren)
Adult(s) and no children
6.5
2.6
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.5
Owners
Social renters
Private renters
1.5
2.5
3.0
0.5
0.9
0.9
House or bungalow
Self-contained flat, maisonette or apartment
Room or rooms (e.g. bedsit)
Other
1.8
2.2
[x]
[x]
0.5
0.9
[x]
[x]
Rural residents
Cosmopolitans
Ethnicity central
Multicultural metropolitans
Urbanites
Suburbanites
Constrained city dwellers
Hard-pressed living
0.9
2.3
1.6
2.5
1.7
0.8
4.2
2.8
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.4
1.6
0.7
Rural
Urban
1.4
2.0
0.6
0.6
20% most deprived Output Areas
Other Output Areas
20% least deprived Output Areas
3.3
1.9
0.9
1.2
0.5
0.5
20% most deprived Output Areas
Other Output Areas
20% least deprived Output Areas
0.5
2.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
North East
North West
Yorkshire and The Humber
East Midlands
West Midlands
East
London
South East
South West
Wales
1.4
3.4
1.9
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
0.5
2.0
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.2
8 and over, percentage victim once or more [note 1, 2]
Unweighted base Violence without
number of interviews
injury (%)
[note 4]
Wounding (%)
Assault with
minor injury (%)
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.0
0.8
0.3
5.4
1.7
1.2
584
4,692
25,928
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.8
0.7
1.1
1.8
2.3
24,727
3,430
2,968
0.2
0.1
[x]
[x]
0.4
0.8
[x]
[x]
1.4
1.4
[x]
[x]
27,249
3,787
29
132
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.1
1.3
0.4
0.6
1.4
1.0
2.0
1.4
0.4
2.7
2.5
5,582
857
983
2,602
6,179
8,393
1,698
4,910
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.9
1.5
8,432
22,772
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.9
0.4
0.3
2.3
1.5
0.5
3,989
18,081
6,597
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.3
1.9
0.2
332
1,571
634
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
1.4
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.1
1.1
1.8
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.4
1.0
1.3
1.2
1.3
1,255
3,559
3,043
2,968
2,714
4,286
2,595
4,449
3,798
2,537
Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW), year ending March 2022
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the notes worksheet.
These data are published as Experimental Statistics, which are in the testing phase and not yet fully develope
Some shorthand is used in this table: [x] indicates that a number is unavailable.
Link to Notes page
Link to contents page
Source: Office for National Statistics – Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales
Personal characteristics
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
All adults
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Born in the UK [note 5]
Born in the UK [note 5]
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Disability [note 6]
Disability [note 6]
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
Sexual orientation [note 5, 7]
rvey for England and Wales (TCSEW), year ending March 2022
le. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the notes worksheet.
perimental Statistics, which are in the testing phase and not yet fully developed.
able: [x] indicates that a number is unavailable.
stics – Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales
Personal characteristics
breakdown
Domestic
(%)
Acquaintance
(%)
All adults
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75+
0.3
0.0
0.9
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.2
0.9
0.4
1.1
0.6
0.2
0.1
Male
Male 18-24
Male 25-34
Male 35-44
Male 45-54
Male 55-64
Male 65-74
Male 75+
0.3
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.4
1.0
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.1
Female
Female 18-24
Female 25-34
Female 35-44
Female 45-54
Female 55-64
Female 65-74
Female
