Description
Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics is an important part of healthcare. Nurses and healthcare workers need to understand and be able to communicate clearly.
Please select one of the following options and discuss your understanding of the role in healthcare and its potential impact on your practice.
Usability
Integration
Interface
Interoperability
Meaningful Use (Meaningful Use terminology has largely been replaced by the phrase ‘Promoting Interoperability’ or ‘PI’)
Reimbursement from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment
NANDA
NIC/NOC
References to use:
American Medical Informatics Association. (2008). Nursing informatics pioneer interview. https://www.amia.org/sites/amia.org/files/Norma-La…
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2017). CMS covers 100 million people. https://www.cms.gov/
Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses & healthcare professionals (6th ed.). Pearson.
Tastan, S., Linch, G. C. F., Keenan, G. M., Stifter, J., McKinney, D., Fahey, L., Lopez, K. D., Yao, Y., & Wilkie, D. J. (2014). Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(8), 1,160-1,170. https://doi.org./10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.004.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeAnswer Post
•Answers the
discussion question(s)
in a detailed manner,
and
•Demonstrates
excellent knowledge
and understanding of
course concepts
Ratings
16 pts
100% Excellent
Answers the
discussion
question(s) in a
detailed manner
and
demonstrates
excellent
knowledge and
understanding
of course
concepts.
14 pts
88% Good
Answers the
discussion
question(s) but
detail is lacking,
and
demonstrates
good knowledge
and
understanding
of course
concepts.
13 pts
80% Fair
Partially
answers the
discussion
question(s) and
partially
demonstrates
knowledge and
understanding
of course
concepts.
6 pts
38% Poor
Minimally
answers the
discussion
question(s) and
minimally
demonstrates
knowledge and
understanding
of course
concepts.
0 pts
0%
Missing
Does not
answer the
discussion
question(s).
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeScholarly
Sources
•Integrates evidence
from assigned reading
OR lesson,
•Integrates evidence
from at least one
outside scholarly
source,
•All sources are
credited within the body
of the post,
•Evidence supports the
discussion, and
•APA format is not
required but is
encouraged.
Ratings
12 pts
100% Excellent
Integrates
evidence from
assigned reading
OR lesson AND
from at least one
outside scholarly
source. All
sources are
credited within
the body of the
post. Evidence
supports the
discussion.
11 pts
88% Good
Integrates
evidence from
assigned
reading OR
lesson only.
All sources are
credited within
the body of the
post. Evidence
supports the
discussion.
10 pts
80% Fair
Integrates
evidence from
outside
scholarly
source only.
All sources are
credited within
the body of the
post. Evidence
supports the
discussion.
5 pts
38% Poor
Lists sources at
conclusion of post
but does not
integrate/credit
evidence into body
of post OR
integrates evidence
but evidence does
not support the
discussion.
0 pts
0%
Missing
Does not
integrate
any
evidence.
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeReply Post
•Replies to a
classmate’s and/or
instructor’s post,
•Reply post provides
additional information or
clarification, and
•Reply post adds
excellent depth to the
discussion.
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeCommunicates
Professionally
All posts:
•are clear and concise,
•are respectful, civil,
and caring, and
•contain excellent
English grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation.
Ratings
14 pts
100% Excellent
Replies to a
classmate’s
and/or
instructor’s post
by providing
additional
information or
clarification.
Reply post adds
excellent depth
to the
discussion.
12 pts
88% Good
Replies to a
classmate’s
and/or
instructor’s post
by providing
additional
information or
clarification.
Reply post adds
good depth to
the discussion.
11 pts
80% Fair
Replies to a
classmate’s
and/or
instructor’s
post. Limited
information or
clarification
provided. Brief
reply post adds
fair depth to the
discussion.
5 pts
38% Poor
Replies to a
classmate’s
and/or
instructor’s post.
Reply does not
provide
additional
information or
clarification.
Brief reply post
does not add
depth to the
discussion.
0 pts
0%
Missing
No reply
post to
classmates
or
instructor.
8 pts
100% Excellent
All posts are
clear, concise,
respectful, civil,
and caring.
Posts contain
excellent
English
grammar,
spelling, and/or
punctuation.
7 pts
88% Good
All posts are
clear, concise,
respectful, civil,
and caring.
Posts contain
good English
grammar,
spelling, and/or
punctuation.
6 pts
80% Fair
All posts are
respectful, civil,
and caring but
are not clear or
concise. Posts
contain fair
English
grammar,
spelling, and/or
punctuation.
3 pts
38% Poor
All posts are
not clear and
concise, AND
contain poor
English
grammar,
spelling, and/or
punctuation.
0 pts
0%
Missing
All posts
are not
respectful,
civil, and
caring.
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeParticipation
During the assigned
week (Sunday the start
of the assigned week
through Sunday the end
of the assigned week):
•Posts in the discussion
at least two times, and
•Posts in the discussion
on two different days
Total Points: 50
Ratings
0 pts
No Points Deducted
During the assigned week (Sunday the
start of the assigned week through Sunday
the end of the assigned week): •Posts in
the discussion at least two times, and
•Posts in the discussion on two different
days
0 pts
Points Deducted (-5 Points)
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of
the assigned week through Sunday the end of
the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the
discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does
NOT post in the discussion on two different
days
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
