Description
Please see attached.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Quality Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
Purpose of this Assessment
The purpose of this assessment is to give you an opportunity to evaluate the quality of a process of
product you have experienced.
Items Required for Submission
To complete this assessment, you are to write a four (4) – six (6) page paper where you evaluate the
process associated with a product or a process you are familiar with. This paper requires you to identify
the standards that are used, knowledge of the product’s development or the process, an ability to apply
a quality method and the ability to speculate on what can be done to improve upon what is.
1.
4-6 page research paper (APA format)
2.
5 -10 slide recommendation based Voice Over PowerPoint
Step ONE: Identify your process or product
You must first identify the product or service that you have adequate knowledge of. Once this product
has been identified, you need to provide sufficient content so your reader understands the product or
process, what it was selected, and how it works. This foundational section is very important to the
development of this assessment.
Step TWO: Identify standards and select a quality method
Next, you must identify and discuss the quality standards that are being applied to this product, service,
or process. This will depend heavily on the perspective that you choose to approach the project. If you
choose to focus on the product from the end user’s perspective, this will likely mean you have to know
Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
1
Quality Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
what the expectations are of the end user in order to determine whether the product, service, or
process meets the standards. Whatever you choose, just be sure to disclose the standards. Then apply a
quality method (Lean, Six Sigma, TQM, etc.) to help ensure quality exists for this process, product, or
service. This element will require you to apply a quality approach that may not be what is actually used
and that is play. The goal is to ensure you are able to apply and implement one of the quality frameworks
that make sense.
Step THREE: Complete the Voice Over Powerpoint
It is possible that you have come to the conclusion that the process, product, or service is of quality.
However, there is very little that cannot be approved upon. In this Voice Over PowerPoint, you are to
complete a 5 – 10 slide presentation where you identify opportunities for improvements. Be sure to
discuss the benefits of the recommended changes.
Step FOUR: Complete Checklist for Submission
Before you submit your work, check to see if you have met the criteria noted below. Did you:
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Find scholarly sources specific to quality methods, standards, and process improvement?
Identify and provide sufficient context for your product, service, or process?
Apply a standard and quality method?
Complete a Voice Over PowerPoint that is specific to improvement recommendations of the
process?
Discuss the expected benefits of the applied recommendations?
Read the rubric and ensure you met each criteria at the proficient or higher level?
Apply APA guidelines to include the use of headings?
Edit your paper?
Step FIVE: Submit Your Work
●
Your completed files should be submitted through the Final Assessment page of your competency.
●
Please note, for files smaller than 10MB (e.g., most Word documents), use the corresponding
“+UPLOAD STUDENT FILE” button to upload your Final Assessment documents. For larger files of
any type (e.g., voice over PowerPoint files, video presentations), please use the optional TEXT
EDITOR to provide a URL where your tutorial faculty can download your file.
●
How you create a download URL is up to you, but various free online providers, including Google
Drive and Dropbox, offer this service. Please make sure that the URL you provide can be accessed
by anyone with the link. For further instructions on how to create public links for uploaded files,
consult the support pages for your chosen provider.
Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
2
Quality Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
Scoring Rubric for Final Assessment
Criterion
Introduction
Standards
Application of
Quality
Method
Theory and
Research
Presentation
EMERGING
Did not provide
adequate context
for the product,
service, or process.
DEVELOPING
Provided vague
context for the
product, service, or
process.
PROFICIENT
Provided sufficient
context for the
product, service, or
process and
included quality
considerations with
reasonable
speculations.
Provided clear
disclosure or
speculated
reasonably
regarding the
standards that are
applied. The
perspective of the
standard was clear.
EXEMPLARY
Comprehensively
provided
background
information for the
company and
comprehensively
discussed quality
matters.
Comprehensively
disclosed or
speculated
regarding the
standards that are
applied. The
perspective of the
standard was clear.
Did not disclose or
speculate on the
standards that are
applied.
Vaguely disclosed
or speculated on
the standards that
are applied.
Rarely or never
applied
quality methods,
practices and
examples.
Sometimes applies
applied
quality methods,
practices and
examples.
Often applied
quality methods,
practices and
examples.
Consistently applies
quality methods,
practices and
examples.
Does not research
or present key
theories and
practices related to
the quality,
standards, and
improvement.
Somewhat
researches and
presents key
theories and
practices related to
to
quality, standards,
and improvement.
Generally
researches and
presents key
theories and
practices related to
to
quality, standards,
and improvement.
Thoroughly
researches and
presents key
theories and
practices related to
quality, standards,
and improvement.
The recorded
presentation or
voiceover
PowerPoint is
shorter
than the specified
length of the
assignment.
Limited if any
The recorded
presentation or
voiceover
PowerPoint is
shorter than the
specified
length of the
assignment. APA
The recorded
presentation or
voiceover
PowerPoint is the
specified length of
the
assignment. APA
formatting
The recorded
presentation
or voiceover
PowerPoint is
the specified length
of the
assignment. APA
formatting
standards are
Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
3
Quality Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
Recommendat
ions and
Discussion
Writing
Mechanics
adherence to APA
standards.
standards are
somewhat
followed but with
numerous
errors.
standards are
followed with a
few minor errors.
PowerPoint
contains the
required amount of
slides. The
presentation or
voiceover is mostly
clear and
professionally
articulated
within the specified
time limit.
Rarely or never
applies
weaknesses to
synthesize
recommendations.
Demonstrates
some
understanding and
applies
weaknesses to
synthesize
recommendations.
Demonstrates
adequate
understanding and
applies
weaknesses to
synthesize
recommendations.
Uses two or fewer
sources to support
case analysis.
The paper lacks
clarity and may be
confusing; too long
or short. Numerous
errors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation.
Limited if any
adherence to APA
standards.
The paper is
somewhat logical,
and well-written;
too long or short.
Some errors in
spelling, grammar
and/or
punctuation. APA
standards are
somewhat followed
but with numerous
errors.
The paper is
logical,
well-written, and
the required length.
There may be one
or two minor errors
in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. APA
formatting
standards are
followed with a few
minor errors.
Final Assessment: Outline and Rubric
followed; citations
and
the reference page
is correct.
PowerPoint
contains the
required amount of
slides.
The presentation or
voiceover is clearly
and
professionally
articulated
within the specified
time
limit.
Demonstrates a
comprehensive
understanding and
applies
weaknesses to
synthesize
recommendations
in a
thoughtful and
meaningful
way.
The paper is logical,
well written,
and the required
length. Spelling,
grammar
and punctuation
are accurate. APA
formatting
standards are
followed; citations
and reference page
is correct.
4
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
