Description
Quality Healthcare: Measuring NP Performance week 3
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Quality Healthcare: Measuring NP
Performance
WEEK 3
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to have students research the measurement tools of
NP performance. Through the use of quality patient outcomes, students will list and
discuss three different patient interventions and how they would specifically measure
the outcomes, and how these primary care interventions result in improved patient
outcomes and cost savings for the practice. In addition, students will discuss how these
interventions result in improved patient ratings.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences
of holistic healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles (CO1)
2. Critically analyze how healthcare systems and APRN practice are organized and
influenced by ethical, legal, economic, and political factors (CO2)
3. Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of
advanced practice nursing in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings
(CO3)
4. Analyze social, historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policies and
advanced practice leadership (CO4)
5. Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters
person-centered healthcare and nursing practice (CO5)
Due Date: Sunday of week 3 by 11:59 PM MST
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments
submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points
possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be
accepted, with a penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which
point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not
considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
Total Points Possible
This assignment is worth 200 points.
Preparing the Assignment
The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) was formed to ensure the
quality of patient care and measurement of patient outcomes with set standards.
Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) is a performance
measurement tool used by millions of health insurance plans. There are 6 domains of
care:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Effectiveness of Care
Access/Availability of Care
Experience of Care
Utilization and Risk Adjusted Utilization
Health Plan Descriptive Information
Measures Collected Using Electronic Clinical Data Systems
You may access the 6 domains of care by clicking this link:
(NCQA, n.d. https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/Links to an external site.)
As an APN, productivity will be an important measurement for the practice to determine
reimbursement and salary. Fee-for-service practices will require a set number of patients
per day to maintain productivity. A capitated practice will require the APN to have a
large panel of patients but also will focus on controlling costs. This can be accomplished
through effective primary care that is accessible, convenient for the patients, and has a
method of measuring the quality of care.
Write a formal paper in APA format with a title page, introduction, the three required
elements below, conclusion, and reference page.
You are now employed as an NP in primary care. Choose one performance measure
from one of the six domains of care, i.e. Adult BMI Assessment, Prenatal, and
Postpartum care, etc.
Develop three different patient interventions for that one performance measure and
how you would specifically implement the intervention and measure the outcomes for
that particular performance measure in clinical practice.
How would these primary care interventions result in improved patient outcomes and
healthcare cost savings?
How can these interventions result in improved NP patient ratings?
SUMMARIZE IN A SHORT PARAGRAPH WHAT YOU LEARN THIS WEEK
Category
Points %
Description
List and discuss three different patient interventions and how you would specifically measure the
outcomes.
60
30%
From the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) website discuss three patient interventions
for the one performance measure.
Develop a measurement tool to track patient outcomes.
How would these primary care interventions result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for
the practice?
60
30%
Discuss how the interventions can result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice.
How can these interventions result in improved patient ratings?
60
30%
Discuss how these interventions can result in improved patient ratings (an NP’s patient scorecard).
180
90%
Total CONTENT Points = 180 pts
Clarity of Writing
10
5%
Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well
organized with proper flow of meaning.
APA Format
10
5%
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.
20
10%
Total FORMAT Points = 20 pts
200
100%
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 200 points
Rubric
NR506NP WK3 Quality Healthcare Paper_SEPT19
NR506NP WK3 Quality Healthcare Paper_SEPT19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Interventions
From the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) website, discuss three patient interventions
for one performance measure.
60 pts
Excellent
Provides detailed information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be
measured. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources.
54 pts
V. Good
Provides some information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be
measured. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources.
48 pts
Satisfactory
Provides non- specific information on three patient interventions and how they could specifically be
measured. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources.
30 pts
Needs Improvement
Lacks detailed information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be
measured. The submission uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not provide information regarding three patient interventions and how they could specifically be
measured. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrimary Care Interventions
Discuss how these primary care interventions result in improved patient outcomes and cost savings for
the practice.
60 pts
Excellent
Provides detailed information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved
patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources.
54 pts
V. Good
Provides some information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient
outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources.
48 pts
Satisfactory
Provides non- specific information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved
patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources.
30 pts
Needs Improvement
Lacks detailed information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient
outcomes and cost savings for the practice. The submission uses information that is not valid, relevant,
or reliable.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not provide information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved
patient outcomes and cost savings for the practice. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePatient Ratings
Describe how these interventions result in improved patient ratings.
60 pts
Excellent
Provides detailed information regarding how these interventions may result in improved patient ratings.
Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources.
54 pts
V. Good
Provides some information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient
ratings.
48 pts
Satisfactory
Provides non-specific specific information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in
improved patient ratings. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources/
30 pts
Needs Improvement
Lacks detailed information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved patient
ratings. The submission uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not provide information regarding how the primary care interventions can result in improved
patient ratings. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of writing
10 pts
Excellent
Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well
organized with proper flow of meaning
9 pts
V. Good
Good use of standard English showing original thought. No more than two spelling or grammar errors.
Well organized with proper flow of meaning.
8 pts
Satisfactory
Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or
grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts
and concepts.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than six spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of writing APA format, grammar, spelling, and
punctuation
APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in
indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
10 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
9 pts
V. Good
2-4 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
8 pts
Satisfactory
5-7 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
5 pts
Needs Improvement
8-9 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Post contains 10 or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly
makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the
due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for
each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a
maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and
discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
Manual Deductions
0 pts
Manual Deductions
0 pts
Total Points: 200
Top
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
