Description
all instructions are attached Under 10% plagiarism please/ no AI
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Strategic Thinking Map: Recommendations Report RUBRIC
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeRequirements
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeContent
Ratings
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required
components, as specified in
the assignment, and has
required number of sources.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Includes most of the
required components,
as specified in the
assignment.
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate
knowledge of the materials,
including analysis techniques and
strategies; correctly represents
knowledge from the readings and
sources.
Pts
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the
required components,
as specified in the
assignment.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the
required components,
as specified in the
assignment.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
4 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials.
10 pts
10 pts
Strategic Thinking Map: Recommendations Report RUBRIC
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeSynthesis and
Evaluation
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeVisual
Component
Ratings
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate
synthesis and evaluation of course
concepts in strategic thinking map
recommendations.
5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Visual component is
professional,
containing required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions in synthesis
and evaluation.
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Visual component is less
professional. Includes
most of the required
components, as specified
in the assignment.
Pts
9 to >6.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
synthesis and
evaluation.
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Visual component is
amateur. Includes some
of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
synthesis and
evaluation.
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Visual component is
poor quality. Includes
few of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
15 pts
5 pts
Strategic Thinking Map: Recommendations Report RUBRIC
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeSources
5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources meet required
criteria and are well
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources meet required
criteria but are less than
adequately chosen to
provide substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources meet required
criteria and are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
5 pts
Strategic Thinking Map: Recommendations Report RUBRIC
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeDemonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization, grammar
and style //
Demonstrates proper
use of APA style
Total Points: 50
PreviousNext
Ratings
5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Assignment is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper format, as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and paragraph
structure; few errors in
grammar and spelling. //
Assignment contains
proper APA 7
formatting, with no
more than one
significant error.
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Assignment is fairly well
organized and written,
and is in proper format,
as outlined in the
assignment. Reasonably
good sentence and
paragraph structure;
significant number of
errors in grammar and
spelling. // Few errors in
APA 7 formatting, with
no more than two to
three significant errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Assignment is poorly
organized; does not
follow proper paper
format. Inconsistent to
inadequate sentence and
paragraph development;
numerous errors in
grammar and spelling. //
Significant errors in
APA 7 formatting, with
four to five significant
errors.
Pts
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Assignment is not
organized or well
written, and is not in
proper paper format.
Poor quality work;
unacceptable in terms
of grammar and
spelling. // Numerous
errors in APA 7
formatting, with more
than five significant
errors.
5 pts
Strategic Thinking Map: Recommendations Report
The next component of your Capstone Project is determining alternative
recommendations from your module 4 analysis. You will conduct an evaluation of
alternative strategic choices pertaining to your recommendations for this project. (What
would you suggest if your original recommendations aren’t feasible?)
For this milestone, you will complete the following:
•
•
Develop a Strategic Map that highlights your recommendations – see examples in the
link A Complete Strategy Map Template (Including Examples)Links to an external site.
Write a 3–4-page report identifying and breaking down your recommendations. The
strategic map will be included in an appendix in your report as a supplement to your
written recommendations.
Your recommendations should include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Strategies for intervening in potential weaknesses and threats discovered in your
market and SWOT, PEST, or SOAR analysis
Strategies for leveraging positive attributes discovered in the SWOT, PEST, or SOAR
analysis
Strategies for attracting healthcare professionals and staff
Feasibility for the development of a satellite clinic or new service line
Value-adding strategies, support, and resources (e.g., equipment, technology,
healthcare advocacy, offering preventive healthcare services)
The use of corporate-level, business-level, and functional-level strategies
Report Requirements:
•
•
•
•
•
3-4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.
Include the strategic thinking map in an appendix.
Include a minimum of four (4) references with associated in-text citations
Formatted according to APA 7 format
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
