Description
This assessment addresses the following course objective(s):
Select methods to work effectively with patients, providers, and payers to create more effective delivery models.
As the hospital’s facility manager, develop a Power Point presentation showing why it would be important to renovate and refresh common areas in the hospital, such as the lobbies and information areas, public bathrooms, gift shops, cafeteria and cafes during a fiscal year when raises to patient care employees have been stagnant. This would be an either/or decision due to capital revenue available.
Include images, data charts, and bullet points to illustrate key points.
Include speaker’s notes on each slide
Your presentation should be original, creative, professional, and convincing.
Include a title slide, and reference slide. A minimum of three references is required. APA format should be followed throughout.
Rubric
BU650 Unit 1 Assignment – Presentation Renovation Feasibility
BU650 Unit 1 Assignment – Presentation Renovation Feasibility
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Concepts
30 pts
Level 5
Ideas and concepts are consistently clear and always well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are always discussed fairly and always synthesized in a logical fashion with strong, well-founded supporting arguments. All discussion and arguments are thoroughly supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.
27 pts
Level 4
Ideas and concepts are clear and well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are discussed fairly and synthesized in a logical fashion with well-founded supporting arguments. Discussion and arguments are supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.
24 pts
Level 3
Ideas and concepts are reasonably well explained. Discussion and arguments are, for the most part, supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable relationships between concepts, and ideas are discussed. These could be further strengthened with additional research or resource materials.
21 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and concepts are presented; however, they are underdeveloped and poorly explained. There is minimal evidence of a relationship between ideas and concepts. Discussion and arguments are not supported with additional research or research that is pertinent and valid.
18 pts
Level 1
Some basic ideas and concepts are started, but not developed. There is no identifiable relationship between ideas and concepts. There is little or no discussion and/or argument with supporting research.
0 pts
Level 0
There are no developed ideas or concepts. There is no supporting research.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
30 pts
Level 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
27 pts
Level 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
24 pts
Level 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
21 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
18 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Conventions
24 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
21.6 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.
19.2 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits a command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
16.8 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
14.4 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
24 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
16 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
14.4 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
12.8 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
11.2 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
9.6 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
16 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext
