Description
fter reviewing the resources respond to the following prompts:
Compare and contrast your understanding of in-groups and out-groups
List some groups you are a part of and how those interactions make you feel
In what ways do you see how social justice can be included in this discussionfter reviewing the resources respond to the following prompt After reviewing the resources respond to the following prompts:
After reviewing the resources respond to the following prompts:
Compare and contrast your understanding of in-groups and out-groups
List some groups you are a part of and how those interactions make you feel
In what ways do you see how social justice can be included in this discussion?
?
3.2 The Out-group Interview Assignment
Based on the readings from this week, conduct an interview with someone from within a diverse community that you feel is part of what you consider the out-group. Ask the following questions and incorporate the responses in a 3-4-page APA formatted paper to include:
Title page
Abstract
Introduction
Person you are interviewing
Industry they work in
Interview feedback
Closing statement
Applicable references/citations:
What has been your experiences with diversity in the workplace and your community? If you can make changes to improve diversity in the community, what changes would you recommend and why?
Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubject Knowledge
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The assignment includes all required components. In-depth knowledge of the topic is present and evidence is consistently integrated to support opinions, ideas and claims.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The assignment includes all required components. Knowledge of the topic is present and evidence is integrated to support opinions, and ideas.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
The assignment includes most required components, several items are missing. Basic knowledge of the topic is included and evidence is intermittently integrated to support opinions, ideas and claims.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The assignment does not include all assignment components. Minimal knowledge of the topic is included and there is a little to no evidence or integrated evidence to support opinions, ideas and claims.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thinking
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The assignment includes a thorough and thoughtful analysis of the issues. Student comprehensively and substantively explores the topic not only addressing the basics of the issue but the nuances and complexities of the topic.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The assignment includes a thoughtful analysis of the issues. Student explores the topic addressing the basics of the issue and details some complexities related to the topic.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
The assignment includes a basic analysis of the issues but lacks substance and depth.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The assignment does not include an analysis of the issues and lacks substance and depth.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Writing and grammar is consistent with graduate level work. There is no error in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is fully conveyed and clear.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Writing and grammar is consistent with graduate level work. There are some errors in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is clear.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
Writing and grammar is somewhat consistent with graduate level work. There are multiple errors in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is unclear and inconsistent. Connections in the work are fragmented.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Writing and grammar is not consistent with graduate level work. There are frequent and multiple errors in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is unclear and scattered. There are little to no logical connections in the work.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Correct use of the APA formatting and correct citations are used when needed.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
There are minor errors in the APA formatting and citations. There are a few citations missing and/or incorrectly cited.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
Several errors appear in the APA formatting citations. Some citations are missing.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The APA formatting is used inconsistently and/or infrequently. There are several citations missing and/or incorrectly cited.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
Total Points: 40
3.3 ePortfolio Update Assignment
Submitting a website url
The ePortfolio updates due for this week are as follows:
Diversity & Groups Summary
Video: Who is Alfred AdleJones et al. (2013) CH. 8 & 9
[3.3] ePortfolio Update Assignment (Must submit the Assignment The ePortfolio updates due for this week are as follows:
Create the ePortfolio if not created already
Format the ePortfolio as that of an APA paper with title page, abstract page, reference section, etc.
List the name of the organization they have chosen and have an abstract/introduction listed for the organization
Include citations from resources connected to the abstract/introduction about the organization
Include the organizational chart from the selected organization
Technical Information: For additional information on creating an ePortfolio, visit this pageLinks to an external site. in the LMS Support Center Knowledge Base.
Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubject Knowledge
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The assignment includes all required components. In-depth knowledge of the topic is present and evidence is consistently integrated to support opinions, ideas and claims.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The assignment includes all required components. Knowledge of the topic is present and evidence is integrated to support opinions, and ideas.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
The assignment includes most required components, several items are missing. Basic knowledge of the topic is included and evidence is intermittently integrated to support opinions, ideas and claims.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The assignment does not include all assignment components. Minimal knowledge of the topic is included and there is a little to no evidence or integrated evidence to support opinions, ideas and claims.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thinking
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The assignment includes a thorough and thoughtful analysis of the issues. Student comprehensively and substantively explores the topic not only addressing the basics of the issue but the nuances and complexities of the topic.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The assignment includes a thoughtful analysis of the issues. Student explores the topic addressing the basics of the issue and details some complexities related to the topic.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
The assignment includes a basic analysis of the issues but lacks substance and depth.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The assignment does not include an analysis of the issues and lacks substance and depth.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Writing and grammar is consistent with graduate level work. There is no error in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is fully conveyed and clear.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Writing and grammar is consistent with graduate level work. There are some errors in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is clear.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
Writing and grammar is somewhat consistent with graduate level work. There are multiple errors in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is unclear and inconsistent. Connections in the work are fragmented.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Writing and grammar is not consistent with graduate level work. There are frequent and multiple errors in the organization, word choice, grammar, sentence structure and/or descriptions. The author’s intent is unclear and scattered. There are little to no logical connections in the work.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Correct use of the APA formatting and correct citations are used when needed.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
There are minor errors in the APA formatting and citations. There are a few citations missing and/or incorrectly cited.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Average
Several errors appear in the APA formatting citations. Some citations are missing.
4 to >1.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The APA formatting is used inconsistently and/or infrequently. There are several citations missing and/or incorrectly cited.
1 to >0 pts
Incomplete
10 pts
Total Points: 40
