Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice
From as Little as $13/Page

Your presentation should:

1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.

Submission Instructions:

Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.
The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
Presentation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Identification of Main Issues/Problemsview longer description 4 ptsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.3 ptsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.2 ptsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.1 ptsPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. / 4 pts
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelmsview longer description 4 ptsDistinguishedPresents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.3 ptsExcellentPresents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.2 ptsFairPresents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.1 ptsPoorPresents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. / 4 pts
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understandingview longer description 4 ptsDistinguishedProvides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.3 ptsExcellentProvides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.2 ptsFairProvides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.1 ptsPoorProvides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. / 4 pts
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literatureview longer description 4 ptsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.3 ptsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.2 ptsFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.1 ptsPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. / 4 pts
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelinesview longer description 4 ptsDistinguishedDemonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.3 ptsExcellentDemonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.2 ptsFairDemonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.1 ptsPoorDemonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. / 4 pts