Description
As part of this assignment, you are required to present the below method used for Hazard and Risk Assessment using a case study or an example. Bow-Tie Method The Presentation shall be around 20 minutes in front of an audience consisting of tutors and classmates, followed by questions and answers from assessors and students. Notes: This is an individual assignment It is your responsibility to ensure that your work is neatly and accurately presented. The Presentation shall be in PowerPoint or any other digital presentation formats. Maximum Slides – 12 to 15. The report must be submitted via UCLan Blackboard Turnitin. Referencing: All academic writing must be referenced, and if you use other people’s ideas without referencing them, you are plagiarizing their work. Follow the Harvard system of referencing within your text. Missing in-text referencing/citation will be strictly penalized by reducing marks. Presentation Format Title Aim and Objectives Introduction Methodology/Approach Example/Case study Merits/Demerits Future Scope Conclusion References Note: The presentation shall be prepared in a white background with black font.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
ASSESSMENT BRIEF 2023 – 2024
Programme:B.Sc. (Hons) Fire Safety Management and B.Sc. (Hons) Health Safety
and Environmental Management
Module Code/Module: FV3103 / Hazard and Risk Management
Module Tutors: Amal S. George, Ali Imran
Assessment Title/Number:Presentation
Date of Issue: 11/02/2024
Date of Submission: 17/03/2024
Date of Feedback: 14/04/2024
(Tick in the appropriate box)
You are encouraged to word process your assessment.
You are required to submit this assessment electronically through Blackboard.
Instructions:
•
•
•
•
This assignment contains ONEQUESTION/TASK.
Complete the task fully with all possible evidence for achieving the learning
outcome/s.
You should not reveal your name or any identity on the assignment
submitted, failing to which your submission will be invalid.
This assessment is worth 20% of the module mark.
Please do not submit this assessment brief with your work.
Page 1 of 7
ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET 2023-2024
Programme:B.Sc. (Hons) Fire Safety Management and B.Sc. (Hons) Health Safety
and Environmental Management
Module Code/Module: FV3103 / Hazard and Risk Management
Module Tutors: Amal S. George, Ali Imran
Assessment Title/Number:Presentation
Date of Issue: 11/02/2024
Date of Submission: 17/03/2024
Date of Feedback: 14/04/2024
(Tick in the appropriate box)
I confirm that this piece of work which I have
submitted is all my own work and that references
and quotations from both primary and secondary
sources have been fully identified and properly
acknowledged. I am fully aware that plagiarism
and collusion are academic offences.
I also confirm that I have not used translation
services or translation software in the production of
this assignment.
Student’s signature:
Question/
Task
Max.
Mark
Mark
in
Percentage
Subject
Knowledge
and Verbal
Presentation
50
50%
Presentation
Format
50
50%
Total
100
100%
Date:
Please note the following penalties for late
submission:
Date
of
Submission
Maximum Mark
1-5 working days
late
40%
More
than
5
working days late
0%
1 Marker
Name:
2 Marker*
Name:
UCLan Verification
Name:
External
Initials
Name:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
st
nd
Examiner
* 2nd Marking on sample basis. Please note that all marks are provisional subject to confirmation by the
Module Assessment Board of the University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Page 2 of 7
Task 1
(100 Marks)
Presentation on Hazard and Risk Assessment Methods
As part of this assignment, you are required to present the below method used for Hazard and
Risk Assessment using a case study or an example.
•
Bow-Tie Method
The Presentation shall be around 20 minutes in front of an audience consisting of tutors and
classmates, followed by questions and answers from assessors and students.
Notes:
•
•
•
•
•
This is an individual assignment
It is your responsibility to ensure that your work is neatly and accurately presented.
The Presentation shall be in PowerPoint or any other digital presentation formats.
Maximum Slides – 12 to 15.
The report must be submitted via UCLan Blackboard Turnitin.
Referencing:
All academic writing must be referenced, and if you use other people’s ideas without
referencing them, you are plagiarizing their work.Follow the Harvard system of referencing
within your text. Missing in-text referencing/citation will be strictly penalized by reducing
marks.
Presentation Format
• Title
• Aim and Objectives
• Introduction
• Methodology/Approach
• Example/Case study
• Merits/Demerits
• Future Scope
• Conclusion
• References
Note: The presentation shall be prepared in a white background with black font.
Academic Misconduct Definitions
Page 3 of 7
•
Cheating is any deliberate attempt to deceive and covers a range of offences described
in the ICEM Policy on Unfair Means to Enhance Performance.
•
Plagiarism describes copying from the works of another person without suitably
attributing the published or unpublished works of others.
•
Collusion is an attempt to deceive the examiners by disguising the true authorship of
an assignment by copying or imitating in close detail another student’s work – this
includes with the other student’s consent and also when 2 or more students divide the
elements of an assignment amongst themselves and copy one another’s answers.
•
Re-presentation is an attempt to gain credit twice for the same piece of work.
•
Fabrication is making up research data or results and reporting the same.
•
Falsification is manipulating the research data or results such that inaccurate
information is reported.
Accepted Similarity Index
•
The College uses an online Assessment Tool called Turnitin. Students are required to
self-submit their own assignment on Turnitin and will be given access to the
Originality Reports arising from each submission.
•
The accepted similarity percentage for an assessment is about 10%. However, the case
may still be reported for investigation if the similarity percentage is below 10% subject
to the Module Tutor’s academic judgment.
•
Similarity percentages above 10 % will be reported to the Unfair Means to Enhance
Performance Committee subject to the discussion with the Module Tutor/justification
from the Module Tutor. The case may or may not be formally investigated.
Penalties of Academic Misconduct
All instances or allegations of the use of unfair means within summative assessment will be
investigated in line with the college UMEP policy. If an allegation is found to be proven, then
the appropriate penalty will be implemented:
•
For the first time: the penalty will be 0% for the element of assessment, the plagiarized
element of assessment must be resubmitted to the required standard and the mark for
the module following resubmission will be restricted to the minimum pass mark (i.e.
40%).
Page 4 of 7
•
In the event of a repeat offence of cheating, plagiarism, collusion or re-presentation on
the same or any other module within the course; the appropriate penalty will be 0% for
the module with no opportunity for reassessment and you being able to retake the
module in a subsequent year.
Penalties for Over-Length Assignments
•
Assignment briefs will include clear instructions about word counts. Students are
expected to adhere to the word count requirements for each assessment. If students
exceed these word count limits, they may receive a reduction in marks as follows.
•
For written assignments that exceed a word count limit by
❖ 0-10% – no penalty
❖ +>10.1% – 20%: 2.5% reduction in mark
❖ +>20.1% – 30%: 5% reduction in mark
❖ +>30.1% – 40%: 7.5% reduction in mark
❖ +>40.1% – 50%: 10% reduction in mark
❖ +>50.1% – 60%: 12.5% reduction in mark
❖ +>60.1% – 70%: 15% reduction in mark
❖ +>70.1% – 80%: 17.5% reduction in mark
❖ +>80.1% – 90%: 20% reduction in mark
❖ +>90.1% – 100%: 22.5% reduction in mark
❖ >100%: 25% reduction in mark but no student will fail an assessment
because of a penalty for exceeding the word limit
Artificial Intelligence Guidance
Artificial Intelligence (AI) will breach the academic regulations when: “Using technological
aids and AI, including translation software, paraphrasing tools, text generating software
(essay bots), and tools to generate graphics or artworks, without specific authorisation.”
(source QAA April
Initial Key Principles for Students on the use of Artificial Intelligence
•
Using AI under the tutor’s guidance will be acceptable in certain situations but
students need to ensure that they comply with the academic regulations on Academic
Integrity.
•
Ensure the use of the AI tool is in line with the assessment brief and any further
advice from the tutor setting the assignment.
•
Do not rely solely on AI tools to complete assignments. Use AI tools to enhance your
work, not as a replacement for it.
Page 5 of 7
•
Acknowledge the extent to which AI has been used as part of referencing their
sources, clarifying the contribution of AI to make clear what is their own work.
Students have to cite AI tool they used (such as ChatGPT) and describe how they
used it.
•
Avoid assuming that AI responses are always accurate. AI-generated information may
sometimes be inaccurate or misleading.
•
Keep drafts to evidence the thinking and development of the work if requested.
•
Students may be asked to respond to questions to test their knowledge of their
assessed work.
•
Failure to follow this advice may lead to allegations of academic misconduct and will
impact students’ ability to defend themselves.
Marking Criteria
Criteria
Subject
knowledge and
Verbal
Presentation
Presentation
Format
Description
Verbal presentation style, subject
knowledge of the presenter, is the
presenter audible and fluent, has it
been rehearsed? Question handling
etc.
Aim and Objectives
Introduction
Methodology/Approach
Example/Case study
Merits/Demerits and Future Scope
Conclusion
References
Total
Marks
Total
50
50
5
10
10
10
5
5
5
50
100
Page 6 of 7
Marking Scheme
Classif
ication
Grade
100
94
1st
87
80
Relevance
Knowledge
Analysis
20%
Directly relevant to
title. Able to address
the
implications,
assumptions
and
nuances of the title.
Relevance to practice
is thoroughly and
explicitly addressed.
20%
Makes effective use of a
comprehensive range of
theory
and
practice
knowledge.
Demonstrates ability in the
manipulation and transfer
of subject material to
demonstrate
a
solid
understanding of the issues
in both theory and practice.
15%
A
comprehensive
analysis of the
material
resulting
in
clear
and
illuminating
conclusions.
Directly relevant to
title.
Is able to demonstrate
effective
practice
relevance.
Makes effective use of
good theory and practice
knowledge.
Manipulates and transfers
some
material
to
demonstrate a clear grasp of
the themes, questions and
issues in theory and
practice.
Generally, addresses
the title, sometimes
addresses irrelevant
issues.
Relevance to practice
effectively addressed,
may be implicit in
places.
Adequate knowledge of a
fair range of relevant
theoretical and practice
related
material
with
evidence of an appreciation
of its significance.
74
68
2.1
65
62
58
2.2
55
Argument
&
Structure
20%
Coherent
and
logically
structured,
making creative
use
of
an
appropriate mode
of
argument
and/or theoretical
model.
Originality
Presentation
15%
Distinctive
work showing
independent
thought
and
critical
engagement
with
alternative
views.
10%
A very well
written answer
with standard
spelling
and
syntax.
Good analysis
of the material
resulting
in
clear and logical
conclusions.
Generally
coherent
and
logically
constructed.
Uses
an
appropriate mode
of argument or
theoretical
model.
Contains some
distinctive or
independent
thinking.
Beginning to
formulate an
independent
position
Adequate
analytical
treatment, with
occasional
descriptive or
narrative
passages which
lack
clear
analytical
purpose.
Conclusions are
clear.
Adequate attempt
to construct a
coherent
argument,
but
may suffer loss
of focus and
consistency.
Issues at stake
may lack clarity
or
theoretical
models couched
in
simplistic
terms.
Sound work
which
expresses
a
personal
position, often
in broad terms
and
tends
towards
uncritical
conformity to
one or more
standard views
of the topic.
Basic understanding of a
limited range of relevant
theoretical and practice
related material.
Largely
descriptive or
narrative
in
style
with
limited
evidence
of
analytical
capability.
Conclusions are
not always clear
or logical
A basic argument
is evident but
tends
to
be
supported
by
assertion
and
lacks
proper
development.
Coherence and
clarity
are
evident
only
intermittently
Largely
derivative.
No personal
view
is
adequately
formulated
Wholly
uncritical and
conforming to
one or more
standard
views.
A limited understanding of
a narrow range of relevant
theoretical and practice
related material or a lack of
basic knowledge in either
or both theory and practice
necessary
for
an
understanding of the topic
Heavy
dependence on
description
and/or narrative.
Paraphrase
is
common.
Evidence
of
analysis
is
lacking.
Clear
and
logical
conclusions are
sparse
Little evidence of
coherent
argument.
There is a lack of
development and
the work may be
repetitive and/or
thin.
Almost wholly
derivative.
The
writer’s
contribution
rarely
goes
beyond
simplifying
paraphrase.
No evidence
of
personal
thought.
52
48
45
3
42
40
35*
30*
Fail
25
10
Some
degree
of
irrelevance to the title
is common.
Only
the
most
obvious issues are
addressed
at
a
superficial level and
in
unchallenging
terms.
Relevance to practice
is
superficially
addressed and rarely
made explicit
Relevance to the title
is intermittent or
missing.
The topic is reduced
to its vaguest and least
challenging terms.
Relevance to practice
is barely considered
or not at all.
Page 7 of 7
Style is lucid
and resourceful
with
an
appropriate
bibliographical
apparatus.
Well
written
with standard
spelling
and
syntax.
Style is lucid
utilising
an
appropriate
format
and
bibliographical
apparatus.
Competently
written
with
only
minor
lapses
from
standard
spelling
and
syntax.
Style
is
readable with
acceptable
format
and
bibliographical
status.
Style
of
presentation
makes reading
difficult.
Deficiencies in
spelling,
syntax, format
or
bibliographical
apparatus
impact
significantly
upon clarity.
Poorly written
with numerous
deficiencies in
syntax,
spelling,
expression and
presentation.
The writer may
achieve clarity
(if at all) only
by
using
simplistic
or
repetitious
style.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
