Description
Week 8 Assignment: Build a substance-based PowerPoint presentation (with audio support using PowerPoint, Kaltura, PodOmatic or other available audio/video software) of at least 15 slides with an introduction, body and summary slides on a the concepts listed below from Week 8 Reading (Baltzan – Chapter 9).
Submission Instructions:
Submit your completed presentation by uploading your file to the assignment.
Total Value = 100%
Exemplary 100%
Accomplished 85%
Developing 75%
Beginning 65%
Did Not Attempt 0%
Points Available
CRITERION 1
Introduction
The introduction clearly states the main point(s) and sub point(s) to preview the structure of the presentation.
The introduction states the main point(s) and sub point(s), but partially previewed the structure of the presentation.
The introduction partially states the main point(s) and sub point(s), but partially previewed the structure of the presentation.
There is no clear introduction of the main point(s) or sub point (s).
Student failed to complete the introduction.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 1
CRITERION 2
Process of The Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
The response clearly and accurately addressed the process with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the process with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the process with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the process with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the process.
10
10% VALUE FOR CRITERION 2
CRITERION 3
Traditional Software Development Methodology: Waterfall
The response clearly and accurately addressed the concept with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the concept with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the concept with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the concept with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the concept.
10
10% VALUE FOR CRITERION 3
CRITERION 4
Agile Software Development Methodologies
The response clearly and accurately addressed the concept with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the concept with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the concept with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the concept with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the concept.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 4
CRITERION 5
Managing Software Development Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the activity with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the activity.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 5
CRITERION 6
Choosing Strategic Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the activity with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the activity.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 6
CRITERION 7
Project Planning
The response clearly and accurately addressed the activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the activity with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the activity.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 7
CRITERION 8
Managing Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the activity with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the activity.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 8
CRITERION 9
Outsourcing Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with clarity and accuracy.
The response addressed the activity with little to no clarity or accuracy.
Student failed to address the activity.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 9
CRITERION 10
Summary
The summary clearly restated the main point(s) and sub point(s) to conclude the presentation.
The summary restated the main point(s) and sub point(s), but partially concluded the presentation.
The summary partially re-stated the main point(s) and sub point(s) and partially concluded the presentation.
There is no clear conclusion of the main point(s) or sub point (s).
Student failed to complete the summary.
10
10 % VALUE FOR CRITERION 10
