Philosophy Required Written Response #1

Description

Response to Reading #1 (Due Module 3)

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Philosophy Required Written Response #1
From as Little as $13/Page

Most teachers develop their personal teaching philosophy borrowing from a variety of philosophical models. Reflecting on how you teach (or plan to), describe the ways in which your teaching beliefs and practices reflect four or five specific historical and current viewpoints from Chapters 2 – 5. Source(s) must be cited and referenced (3 pages APA).

Reflective Practitioner Writing Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts

Context and Purpose

view longer description

2 pts

Advanced

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work.

1.8 pts

Proficient

Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context).

1.6 pts

Competent

Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., begins to show awareness of audience’s perceptions and assumptions).

1.4 pts

Novice

Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience).

/ 2 pts

Content Development

view longer description

2 pts

Advanced

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding, and shaping the whole work.

1.8 pts

Proficient

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work.

1.6 pts

Competent

Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work.

1.4 pts

Novice

Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work.

/ 2 pts

Genre and Disciplinary Conventions

view longer description

2 pts

Advanced

Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task (s) including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices

1.8 pts

Proficient

Demonstrates consistent use of important conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s), including organization, content, presentation, and stylistic choices

1.6 pts

Competent

Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organization, content, and presentation

1.4 pts

Novice

Attempts to use a consistent system for basic organization and presentation.

/ 2 pts

Sources and Evidence

view longer description

2 pts

Advanced

Demonstrates skillful use of high- quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing

1.8 pts

Proficient

Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.

1.6 pts

Competent

Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing.

1.4 pts

Novice

Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing.

/ 2 pts

Control of Syntax and Mechanics

view longer description

2 pts

Advanced

Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error- free.

1.8 pts

Proficient

Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors.

1.6 pts

Competent

Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors.

1.4 pts

Novice

Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.

/ 2 pts