Description
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Updated Assignment 6 Instructions
Evaluating an Online Meeting
Point Value: 50 Points (25 points for the paper and 25 points for the presentation)
Paper Content: 20 Points
Organization, Grammar & Formatting of Paper: 5 Points
Organization, Content & Delivery of Video Debrief: 25 Points
Paper Evaluating the Meeting and a Video of Your Presentation of findings
For this assignment, you will watch the video on our Canvas website (under Media Gallery)
entitled “Online Meeting Via Zoom with Participants From Around The World” and critique it
given the information we have gone over in the lectures.
Some things to keep in mind (this is not an exhaustive list, it is just to get you started)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Were the meeting objectives clearly communicated in advance of the meeting?
Were the meeting objectives met?
Were there follow-up actions that arose from the meeting? If so, were people assigned
follow-up tasks?
Did the meeting leader effectively moderate the meeting?
Did meeting attendees have an opportunity to participate?
Were the right people invited to the meeting?
Did the meeting last an appropriate amount of time?
Were speakers easily heard?
Was the presentation easily seen?
What was most effective about the meeting?
What was least effective about the meeting?
After watching the meeting and taking notes about these things, you are going to type up a 2-3
page paper (typed, double-spaced) reporting on the meeting. Think of this task as you are an
outside consultant who is an expert in virtual meetings and have been asked to watch the meeting
and provide feedback on what you think worked well and what you think should be done
differently going forward. Your paper is a report on your findings.
I would like you to focus on three things…leader, participants, and content. On a scale of 1-10,
how would you rank each? Explain. I want you to give specific findings (i.e., person X did
________ very well; or Person X didn’t do well with _________; and defend your answer.
As with any paper, you will have an introduction, body (with your findings), and conclusion
(with any takeaways).
Once your paper is done, you will be recording a video of yourself presenting your findings.
Your video should be you making a presentation of your findings. You are not to use any
visual aids, just speak to the camera in a professional way. Do NOT read your paper to us.
ASSESSMENT:
The assignment will be assessed across these general criteria:
•
•
•
Content of paper – 20 points. Content assessment will consider the degree to which the
paper addresses the content areas listed above in a reflective and insightful manner and
within the appropriate length requirements.
Organization, Grammar & Formatting of paper – 5 points. Organization assessment will
consider the degree to which the paper is presented in a cohesive and orderly fashion.
Grammar assessment will consider the degree to which the paper adheres to the rules of
formal English grammar and has been carefully proofread. Properly formatted papers will
be typed and double‐spaced in 12 point type (Times New Roman or similar font), and cite
any sources (if used).
Organization, content and delivery of presentation – 25 points.
SUBMISSION:
•
For this assignment, students will have two separate submissions a) Paper & b)
Video recap:
o The paper must be typed and submitted electronically in MS Word (.docx or .pdf)
format. The file must be named in the following format: Lastname_Assignment6.
Submit your completed document to Assignment 6–Paper, listed on the Modules
and Assignments pages, as a file attachment.
o The video may be uploaded to YouTube and you can submit the link, or you can
upload to Kaltura. Be sure that the link or upload can open.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
