Description
As a final review, polish your philosophy of nursing based on your newly acquired knowledge.
Also, write a summary reflection answering the following questions based on the readings and discussions throughout the course:
As an art and a science, how has your personal nursing philosophy unfolded?
Have there been ideas that have challenged your personal values or assumptions?
Have there been ideas that have caused you personal conflict and may lead to deconstructing those dispositions in a critical manner?
What actions have you taken that illustrate your personal nursing philosophy?
Describe your own definition of the concepts involving the meta-paradigm of nursing.
Has your first written philosophy of nursing changed? In what ways?
Your paper that includes both your philosophy and reflection together should be 2–3 pages in length, in APA format, typed in Times New Roman with 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins. If outside sources are used, they must be cited appropriately.
you can choose anything as my nursing philosophy I don’t care.
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
50 to >41.0 pts
Meets Expectations
The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment, sharing his/her own nursing philosophy, which has changed over the course from the draft in week 1. A summary reflection is included that answers the following questions: • As an art and as a science, how has your personal nursing philosophy unfolded? • Have there been ideas that have challenged your personal values or assumptions? • Have there been ideas that have caused you personal conflict and may lead to deconstructing those dispositions in a critical manner? • What actions do you take that illustrate your personal nursing philosophy? • Describe your own definition of the concepts involving the metaparadigm of nursing • Has your first written philosophy of nursing changed? In what ways?
41 to >37.5 pts
Approaches Expectations
The response to the assignment is generally adequate, but may not answer all reflective questions posed.
37.5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The writer does not respond to the assignment.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Detail
25 to >20.5 pts
Meets Expectations
There is a clear, well- focused topic (philosophy and concepts of the metaparadigm of nursing). Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.
20.5 to >18.75 pts
Approaches Expectations
There is one clear, well- focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information.
18.75 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The topic and main ideas are not clear.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
15 to >12.3 pts
Meets Expectations
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong.
12.3 to >11.25 pts
Approaches Expectations
The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included.
11.25 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA
10 to >8.2 pts
Meets Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
8.2 to >7.5 pts
Approaches Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing.
10 pts
