NURS_500 Personal Nursing Philosophy

Description

Below is the description for the assignment. The book used for this assignment is Theoretical Basis for Nursing, 6th edition by McEwen and Wills. Please let me know if you do not have access to this textbook and I can try to send the information. I’ve also provided the rubric so the expectations are clear. Appreciate the assistance. Here is any clarification is needed. Thanks! After reading this week’s assigned chapters, think about your nursing philosophy. In your own words, discuss your philosophy of nursing. Reflect on the definition of the four concepts of the nursing meta-paradigm. Write your own definition for each concept of the meta-paradigm of nursing. Which concept would you add to the meta-paradigm of nursing and why? Which concept would you eliminate and why?Your paper should be 1–2 pages in length, in APA style, typed in Times New Roman with 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins. Cite at least one outside source using APA style.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
NURS_500 Personal Nursing Philosophy
From as Little as $13/Page

Unformatted Attachment Preview

NURS_500_DE – Philosophy Part I Rubric
NURS_500_DE – Philosophy Part I Rubric
Criteria
Content
Focus and
Detail
Organization
Ratings
Pts
25 to >20.5 pts
Meets Expectations
The writer clearly and
effectively responds to
the assignment,
sharing his/her own
nursing philosophy,
which is supported by
the weekly readings.
20.5 to
>18.75 pts
Approaches
Expectations
The response to
the assignment is
generally
adequate, but may
not be thorough.
18.75 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expectations
The writer does
not respond to
the assignment.
12.5 to >10.25 pts
Meets Expectations
There is a clear, wellfocused topic
(philosophy and four
concepts of the
metaparadigm of
nursing). Main ideas
are clear and are well
supported by detailed
and accurate
information.
10.25 to >9.38 pts
Approaches
Expectations
There is one clear,
well- focused
topic. Main ideas
are clear but are
not well supported
by detailed
information.
9.38 to >0 pts
Does Not
Meet
Expectations
The topic and
main ideas are
not clear.
7.5 to >6.15 pts
Meets Expectations
The introduction is
inviting, states the
main topic, and
provides an overview
of the paper.
Information is
relevant and presented
in a logical order. The
conclusion is strong.
6.15 to >5.63 pts
Approaches
Expectations
The introduction
states the main
topic and provides
an overview of the
paper. A
conclusion is
included.
5.63 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expectations
There is no
clear
introduction,
structure, or
conclusion.
25 pts
12.5 pts
7.5 pts
NURS_500_DE – Philosophy Part I Rubric
Criteria
Mechanics
and APA
Ratings
5 to >4.1 pts
Meets
Expectations
The assignment
consistently
follows current
APA format and is
free from errors in
formatting,
citation, and
references. No
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
All sources are
cited and
referenced
correctly.
4.1 to >3.75 pts
Approaches
Expectations
The assignment
consistently
follows current
APA format with
only isolated and
inconsistent
mistakes and/or
has a few
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
Most sources are
cited and
referenced
correctly.
Pts
3.75 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expectations
The assignment
does not follow
current APA
format and/or has
many
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
Many sources are
cited and
referenced
incorrectly, or
citations and
references are
missing.
5 pts

Purchase answer to see full
attachment