Description
This assignment comes in 3 parts. Part 1 and 2 are discussions, each one will need 200-250 words and 1 reference and 2 peer replies per discussions, each reply 100-150 words and 1 reference. For the assignment please follow the rubric.
Discussion 1
What are the key differences between quantitative and qualitative research? Why would you choose to develop a research project that is quantitative instead of qualitative, or vice versa? What are some considerations to be made when deciding between quantitative and qualitative research?
Discussion 2
What are some of the challenges involved in combining methodologies when creating a research proposal and carrying out a research project? How can these challenges be overcome?
Assignment Week 2 Research Proposal Literature Review
The literature review is one of the most important components, and often the most time consuming part, of a good research proposal. Without the solid foundation of a good literature review, it is difficult to make a strong research proposal.
This week, you will work to develop a rough draft of your literature review. You will continue to develop the literature review next week based on feedback provided by your instructor. Then in week 7, you will submit a well-polished literature review as part of your final research proposal.
The following requirements should be met in your literature review:
Include a minimum of six scholarly sources
Organize in logical sections
Include an overview of the literature
Be unbiased in your presentation of information
Include sources and content relevant to your research questions and hypothesis; state the relevance in your literature review
Include a critical assessment of the sources. Do not simply include a summary of what you have read
A strong introduction and conclusion, including further questions for research
Proper APA formatting, citations, and references
Keep in mind that this is a rough draft, so the literature review does not need to be perfect. However, you should still submit a literature review with proper APA formatting, correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar that meets all of the specifications of the assignment listed above. You will then receive feedback from your instructor and continue to do more research, and modify and improve your current literature review.
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Points Possible: 100
NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review Rough Draft Rubric
NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review Rough Draft Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
10 to >8.2 pts
Accomplished
A minimum of 6 scholarly sources are included and are appropriate for the topic at hand
8.2 to >7.5 pts
Emerging
A minimum of 4 scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.
7.5 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
0+ scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Conclusion
15 to >12.3 pts
Accomplished
A strong introduction and conclusion are included that appropriately introduce the topic and conclude the literature review.
12.3 to >11.25 pts
Emerging
An introduction and conclusion are included that somewhat introduce the topic and somewhat conclude the literature review.
11.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
An introduction and conclusion may be absent or highly inappropriate.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
65 to >53.3 pts
Accomplished
A comprehensive analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A complete, detailed review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A clear and thorough assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is clearly identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are well identified.
53.3 to >48.75 pts
Emerging
A vague or incomplete analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A general review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A general assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is somewhat identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are somewhat identified.
48.75 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Literature review is missing or incomplete. The review does not provide enough information to attach to a problem statement.
65 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA & Mechanics
10 to >8.2 pts
Accomplished
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
8.2 to >7.5 pts
Emerging
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.5 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
