Description
Prepare a minimum 10-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation (PowerPoint with Speaker Notes). The presentation should be 15–20 slides in length, not including your cover slide or reference slide. Your reference slide should cite at least 10 references.
Your presentation should, at the minimum, include discussion of the following topics regarding your change project:
Your specific change project topic
The background of the problem addressed, why you chose this specific change project, and why it had anticipated value to the organization you developed it for
Your findings from your literature review
Your intervention for change
Why your project aligns with the theoretical framework you chose
Project aims, values, and desired outcomes
Your change project implementation process
The outcomes that will be measured and the overall effect on the organization
Use current APA format to cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.
Points: 80
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Videos can be recorded using any software or tool, but all videos are required to be uploaded to My Panopto Videos for assignment submission.
You can also use the Panopto Desktop Recording tool to create your video.
Click hereLinks to an external site. for detailed Panopto instructions.
Rubric
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric Week 6: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Presentation
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric Week 6: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Presentation
24 to >19.68 pts
Meets Expectations
The presentation is well-organized, and meets all length and tome requirements. Audio is clear and reasonably paced. the visual component compliments audio component. The audio portion keeps the audience interested; voice is clear, audible and understandable. The visual slides include a variety of graphics, text, and animation that exhibit a sense of wholeness. The overall presentation is directed toward the appropriate audience, and the tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. A creative presentation is submitted; including backgrounds, color/size of font, transitions, style, and design.
19.68 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
The presentation is mostly well-organized, and meets most of the length and time requirements. Audio is mostly clear with one or two pacing issues. Visual component compliments audio component. The audio portion keeps the audience interested; voice is clear, audible, and understandable. The visual slides include a variety of graphics, text, and animation that exhibit a sense of wholeness, but the presentation may lack creativity or background, color/size of font, style, chosen graphics may deter from the content presented. The overall presentation is directed toward the appropriate audience, and the tone is appropriate to the content and assignment.
18 to >14.16 pts
Falls Below Expectations
The length and time of the presentation are far from meeting the requirements. The presentation is somewhat organized, but several areas of content are lacking in substance and/or clarity. The audio portion is not clear, audible, and understandable in may instances. The visual slides include few relevant graphics, text, and animation. The slide background, color/size of font, and graphics often deter from the content presented. The overall presentation sometimes veers away from the appropriate audience, and the tone is not always appropriate to the content and assignment.
14.16 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The presentation is unorganized and lacks structure. Several content items are missing. It does not meet length and time requirements. Audio is absent or needs significant improvements. Visual component is absent or severely lacking in style and professional presentation.
24 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction/Topic/Background
8 to >6.56 pts
Meets Expectations
A comprehensive and insightful description of the change project topic is introduced. All background information is included. Project importance within the field or significance for the assigned facility is described.
6.56 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
A description of the change project topic is introduced. Most of the background information is included, but a few key elements are missing. Project importance within the field or significance for the assigned facility is introduced, but not fully described.
6 to >4.72 pts
Falls Below Expectations
The change project topic is listed, but there is no supporting background information included. The project importance within the field or significance at the facility is unclear.
4.72 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The content is generally unclear. There is no clear evidence of why the project was chosen for the facility or the nursing field in general.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Identification and Description in PICOT Format
4 to >3.28 pts
Meets Expectations
A clear and explicit statement of the problem, including the target population and background information relative to the specific problem is provided.
3.28 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
A general, broad statement of the problem, including the target population and background information relative to the specific problem is provided.
3 to >2.36 pts
Falls Below Expectations
A general statement of the problem is provided. The target population and background information relative to the specific problem may not be provided.
2.36 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
A statement of the problem is not provided. The target population and background information relative to the specific problem is not provided.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
8 to >6.56 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents a comprehensive and insightful analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are professionally sound and synthesized.
6.56 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Presents a general and mostly insightful analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic, but may be missing key points. Ideas are generally sound and synthesized, but there may be some inaccuracies.
6 to >4.72 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Presents an incomplete analysis of findings that may not be directly related to the change project topic. Ideas are not synthesized and there may be several inaccuracies.
4.72 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Analysis is missing or unrelated to the change project.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAims/Values/Goals
8 to >6.56 pts
Meets Expectations
The desired outcomes are described with insight. The purpose, focus, and viewpoint of the project as well as its expected accomplishments are stated and analyzed. Goals are listed, relevant, measurable, and shared. Specific implementation benefits (values) are considered and addressed in detail. The desired outcomes state the purpose, have a quality focus, and expertly describe the benefits that will occur if the study is implemented.
6.56 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
The desired outcomes are described in a general way. The purpose, focus, and viewpoint of the project as well as its expected accomplishments are stated but only generally analyzed. Goals are listed and generally presented as relevant, measurable, and shared. Implementation (values) are considered and addressed, but may lack detail. The desired outcomes state the purpose, have a general focus, and somewhat describe the benefits that will occur if the study is implemented.
6 to >4.72 pts
Falls Below Expectations
The desired outcomes are described vaguely and with little focus. Analysis is lacking in substance. Goals are listed but some may not be relevant, measurable, and/or shared. Implementation (values) may be too vague to follow. The desired outcomes have no clear focus, and the benefits are unclear or unreasonable.
4.72 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Project aims, values, and desired outcomes are unclear enough to impede the meaning of the section or are irrelevant to the research project.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framelwork
8 to >6.56 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides a thorough description of the problem and research from a theoretical or conceptual framework that is grounded in research. Defines the gaps, and includes how to address them. Considers changes in theoretical constructs.
6.56 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
Identifies a theoretical or conceptual framework that may somewhat relate to the project topic. Somewhat demonstrates that the proposed project is research-based. Defines the gaps, but may not include how to address one of them. Somewhat considers changes in theoretical constructs.
6 to >4.72 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Attempts to identify a theoretical or conceptual framework but falls short, is unclear, or lacks essential details. Does not demonstrate that the proposed project is research-based. Defines the gaps, but does not include how to address them. Does not consider changes in theoretical constructs.
4.72 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
A theoretical or conceptual framework is missing or severely lacking in important details.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntervention
8 to >6.56 pts
Meets Expectations
A good description of the study, proposed study design, rationale, and proposed sampling methods is included in the presentation. A good description of the proposed project implementation is presented, including items such as planning, budget/resources, the who/what/why, training, and sustainability plan for the facility.
6.56 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
A fair description of the study, proposed study design, rationale, and proposed sampling methods is included in the presentation, but a key piece is misidentified. A fair description of the project implementation is presented, but is missing one or two key details from items such as planning, budget/resources, the who/what/why, training, and a sustainability plan for the facility.
6 to >4.72 pts
Falls Below Expectations
A description of the study, proposed study design, rationale, and proposed sampling methods are somewhat identified, but not fully developed. A description of the project implementation is presented, but is missing several key details from items such as planning, budget/resources, the who/what/why, training, and a sustainability plan for the facility.
4.72 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
A description of the study, proposed study design, rationale, and proposed sampling methods are absent or mostly misidentified. There is no clear evidence of an organized implementation plan presented.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations and Conclusions
8 to >6.56 pts
Meets Expectations
A good description of the data analysis is included in the presentation. A clear conclusion and future recommendations are included.
6.56 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
A fair description of the data analysis is included in the presentation. A conclusion is included, but may lack future recommendations.
6 to >4.72 pts
Falls Below Expectations
A description of the data analysis is included but is somewhat unclear in the presentation. Recommendations and conclusions are included, but are unclear or incomplete.
4.72 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
A conclusion is absent or lacking.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA
4 to >3.28 pts
Meets Expectations
The assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors. Correct APA formatting is present to include a title slide and a reference slide. The number of references required by the assignment is presented. In-text APA citations are used in the presentation.
3.28 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectations
The assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors. Correct APA formatting is somewhat present to include a title page, introduction and conclusion with references as required by the assignment, although formatting may be off.
3 to >2.36 pts
Falls Below Expectations
The assignment has several spelling and grammatical errors. APA formatting is attempted, but it is generally incorrect.
2.36 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The assignment has several spelling and grammatical errors that interfere with comprehension. APA formatting is not used.
4 pts
Total Points: 80
