Description
Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7
Start Date & Time
Mar 4, 2024, 12:00 AM
Due Date & Time
Mar 10, 2024, 11:59 PM
Status
Active
Rubric
View Rubric
Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Assessment Description
Students are required to submit reflective journal entries at specific points throughout the course. These reflective narratives help students identify important learning events that happen throughout the course and the practicum.
Write a reflective journal (250-500 words) to outline how your experience at your practicum site related to the following reflective questions:
You have developed a list of resources needed for your project implementation in Topic 6. To complete this reflective journal, discuss with your preceptor the relationship between policy, regulatory requirements, and economics on care outcomes. Discuss how regulatory requirements and financial resources available will impact your project. How do you think this will impact the care that your practicum site will be able to provide?
Reflect on the relationship you discussed above as well as your practicum site experience. Provide an example from your practicum site of these relationships or discuss an example from your professional or personal experience.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
RN-BSN
7.2: Incorporate consideration of cost-effectiveness of care.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 7.2
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Topic 7
– Rubric
Regulatory Requirements and Financial Resources (B)
6 points
Criteria Description
Discuss how regulatory requirements and financial resources available will impact your
project, including how it will impact the care that your practicum sight will be able to
provide. (C7.2)
5. Target
6 points
A discussion of how regulatory requirements and financial resources available will
impact your project, including how it will impact the care that your practicum sight
will be able to provide, is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable
5.34 points
A discussion of how regulatory requirements and financial resources available will
impact your project, including how it will impact the care that your practicum sight
will be able to provide, is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching
4.74 points
A discussion of how regulatory requirements and financial resources available will
impact your project, including how it will impact the care that your practicum sight
will be able to provide, is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient
4.5 points
A discussion of how regulatory requirements and financial resources available will
impact your project, including how it will impact the care that your practicum sight
will be able to provide, is incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory
Collapse All
0 points
A discussion of how regulatory requirements and financial resources available will
impact your project, including how it will impact the care that your practicum sight
will be able to provide, is missing.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Examples
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Provide an example from your practicum site of these relationships or discuss an
example from your professional or personal experience.
5. Target
4.5 points
An example from your practicum site of these relationships or a discussion of an
example from your professional or personal experience is thorough and accurate.
4. Acceptable
4.01 points
An example from your practicum site of these relationships or a discussion of an
example from your professional or personal experience is mostly detailed.
3. Approaching
3.56 points
An example from your practicum site of these relationships or a discussion of an
example from your professional or personal experience is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient
3.38 points
An example from your practicum site of these relationships or a discussion of an
example from your professional or personal experience is incomplete or inaccurate.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An example from your practicum site of these relationships or a discussion of an
example from your professional or personal experience is missing.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
1.05 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target
1.05 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly
directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable
0.93 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the
appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Approaching
0.83 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally
weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Insufficient
0.79 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little
awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate
audience is evident.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
1.05 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
from development.
5. Target
1.05 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic
and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable
0.93 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on
each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Approaching
0.83 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression
of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient
0.79 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and
not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections
between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Evidence
0.9 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target
0.9 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are
clearly considered.
4. Acceptable
0.8 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Approaching
0.71 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Insufficient
0.68 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is
superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective of the writer.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing
0.9 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target
0.9 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
0.8 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching
0.71 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
0.68 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation
0.6 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
0.6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable
0.53 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
0.47 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient
0.45 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 15 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
