Description
Please see attached files for details
Unformatted Attachment Preview
•
•
•
NRNP-6531-10 (02/26/2024-05/12/2024)-PT27
Assignments
Week 2: Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
I-HUMAN CASE STUDY: EVALUATING
AND MANAGING INTEGUMENTARY
CONDITIONS
This course will require you to complete a series of case studies using the i-Human
software application. The i-Human Patients (IHP) Case Player enables you to interact with
virtual patients for the purpose of learning patient-assessment and diagnostic-reasoning
skills. With IHP, you will be able to independently interview, examine, diagnose, and treat
virtual patients and receive expert feedback on your performance.
The integumentary system is susceptible to a variety of diseases, conditions, and injuries,
ranging from the bothersome but relatively innocuous bacterial or fungal infections that
are categorized as disorders to skin cancer and severe burns, which can be lifethreatening.
For this Case Study Assignment, you will examine your first case study and work with a
patient with an integumentary condition. You will formulate a differential diagnosis,
evaluate treatment options, and then create an appropriate treatment plan for the
patient.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
TO PREPARE:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and
treat patients with integumentary conditions.
Access i-Human from this week’s Learning Resources and review this week’s iHuman case study. Based on the provided patient information, think about the
health history you would need to collect from the patient.
Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate
to gather more information about the patient’s condition.
Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
Identify three to five possible conditions that may be considered in a
differential diagnosis for the patient.
Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might
support this diagnosis.
Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and
patient education strategies for patients with integumentary conditions.
Assignment
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For
guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Graduate Programs Help link within the iHuman platform.
BY DAY 7
•
•
Complete your Assignment in i-Human
Upload your PDF from i-Human to this assignment
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To
check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn+last
name+first initial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NRNP_6531_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6531_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeHPI:
Complete HPI
including all 8
aspects and pertinent
information related
to chief complaint.
Ratings
10 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Clearly written HPI
statement including all
8 aspects and pertinent
information related to
chief complaint.
Includes pertinent
positives and negatives.
6 to >3.0 pts
Competent
Well written HPI
statement but missing
1-2 key components
from the history.
Missing pertinent
positives and
negatives.
Pts
3 to >0 pts
Novice
Poorly written HPI
statement. Incomplete
10 pt
ideas and sentences.
s
Lacks basic history
taking skills. Missing
pertinent positives and
negatives.
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeManageme
nt Plan: Problem
Statement – 5 pts…
Diagnosis,
Differentials, and
Coding – 10 pts…
Medications
Ordered – 10 pts…
Treatment plan /
SDOH / Health
Promotion – 20 pts…
Patient Education 10
pts… Follow up – 10
pts… References – 5
pts
70 to >49.0 pts
Proficient
Clearly written
problem statement
including all pertinent
information related to
chief complaint.
Correct primary
diagnosis identified.
Appropriate and
clearly written
differential diagnoses.
Minimum of three
differentials with
appropriate rationale
included. Appropriate
codes included.
Medications
prescribed are
appropriate, evidenced
based, and full
prescription is
included and dosing
correct. Full patient
education information
is included. Clearly
written plan covering
all critical components
for patient’s final
diagnosis. SDOH and
Health promotion /
anticipatory guidance
is addressed.
Comprehensive
patient education is
included. Follow up
instructions are
complete and include
time to next visit and
specific symptoms to
prompt a return visit
sooner. Contains
parenthetical/in-text
citations and at least 3
evidenced based
references less than 5
years old are listed.
Clinical practice
guidelines are cited if
applicable.
49 to >21.0 pts
Competent
Well written problem
statement but missing
1-2 key components.
Correct primary
diagnosis identified.
Well written
differential diagnoses.
May be missing 1-2
critical components.
Priority list may be out
of order. At least 2
differentials are
included and rationale
is generally
appropriate. Most
codes correct but some
errors. Medications
prescribed are
appropriate, may not
be evidenced based,
and missing 1 or 2
elements of the
prescription. Dosing is
correct. Some patient
education information
is missing. . Well
written plan but may
be missing 1-2 key
issues critical to
patient’s diagnosis.
Some aspects of
SDOH are addressed.
Some aspects of
Health Promotion /
anticipatory guidance
are addressed. Patient
education is present
but missing 1 or 2 key
pieces of information.
Follow up instructions
are generally complete
but missing 1 or 2
aspects. Symptoms
that would prompt a
return visit sooner are
included but some are
missing. Contains
parenthetical/in-text
citations and at least 2
evidenced based
references less than 5
years old are listed.
21 to >0 pts
Novice
Poorly written
problem statement.
Incomplete ideas and
sentences. Lacks basic
information. Primary
diagnosis is wrong.
Differential diagnosis
list too brief and
inconclusive. May be
missing 3 or more
critical components. 0
to 2 differentials are
included and rationale
is lacking or not
appropriate. Codes are
incorrect. Medications
prescribed are
inappropriate, are not
evidenced based, and
missing more than 3
elements of the
prescription. Dosing is
incorrect. Patient
education information
is inaccurate or
70 pt
missing important
s
elements. Poorly
written plan. May be
missing 3 or more key
issues that are critical
to patient’s diagnosis.
There are missing
aspects of SDOH and
Health Promotion
anticipatory guidance.
Patient education is
missing many aspects.
Follow up instructions
are missing important
timing aspects.
Symptoms prompting
return visit sooner are
incomplete or missing.
Contains no
parenthetical/in-text
citations and 0
evidenced based
references listed.
Clinical practice
guidelines are not
cited if applicable.
Clinical practice
guidelines are cited if
applicable.
NRNP_6531_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeHistory and
Physical Exam:
Complete an
appropriate health
history (Scores are
automatically
calculated in
iHuman platform.)
and physical exam
(Scores are
automatically
calculated in
iHuman Platform.
Add History and
Physical scores from
iHuman. Max 20
points. Evidence of
Academic Integrity
Issues will result in
a grade of 0.
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext
Ratings
20 pts
Proficient
Achieve a combined
score of 170-200%
10 pts
Competent
Achieve a score of
130-168%
Pts
1 pts
Novice
Achieve a score of
less than 130%
20 pt
s
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
