Description
Module 2, Discussion: China and Its Guanxi
108108 unread replies.108108 replies.
Introduction
Discussions are designed to help you critically analyze an international business problem, at times using the theories and frameworks described in your textbook.
Read the Management focus “China and Its Guanxi” and answer the question: What ethical issues might arise when drawing on guanxiwang to get things done in China? What does this suggest about the limits of using guanxiwang for a Western business committed to high ethical standards?
Directions
You are advised to post at least two responses to each discussion question, one of which should be a reply to someone else’s post. Each response should be no fewer than 150 words and no more than 300 words. If you post only one response, the highest score you can earn is 21/35 (60%), regardless of the quality of that post.
Discussions need to be professional. Please make proper use of capitalization to begin sentences; also make sure that there are no misspellings, incomplete sentences, or other violations of grammatical rules.
The basic criterion for a discussion post to be considered effective is that your message must be original and intelligible. You must communicate concisely and effectively. In addition, you must meet the weekly requirements for full credit on discussion assignments.
You should keep each response within a word limit of 300 words.
Evaluation Criteria
All discussions together make up 35% of the total course score. This discussion is worth 35 points. Here is the rubric Download rubric
for this discussion.
Image Source: www.istockphoto.com
Unformatted Attachment Preview
MGT 6204 – Discussion Rubric
Criteria
Points
One initial major
response (minimum
125 words) to
discussion question.
Points
Writing – Grammar,
sentence structure,
paragraph structure,
spelling, punctuation
Points
Responding to other
students.
Points
Frequency of
responses
Below Expectations
0
Did not complete this
portion of the
assignment or most of
the discussion points
were inappropriate or
were not identified.
0
5 or more different
errors in sentence
structure, paragraph
structure, spelling, and
punctuation.
Developing
7
The discussion points were
identified and described
but with fair accuracy and
some of the discussion
points were inappropriate
or were not identified.
7
3-4 different errors in
sentence structure,
paragraph structure,
spelling, and punctuation.
Competent
9
The discussion points were
identified and described
with good accuracy and
appropriate information was
identified and discussed.
0
Did not respond to other
students or responses
were trite with no
substance.
0
Did not post in the
threaded discussion.
6
9
Responded to other
Responded to one other
students but responses
student, response was
were trite with no
substantive.
substance.
3
Posted on only 1 day of the week.
9
1-2 different errors in
sentence structure,
paragraph structure,
spelling, and punctuation.
Exemplary
10
The discussion points were
identified and described with
high accuracy and all
appropriate information was
identified and discussed
clearly.
10
No errors in
sentence structure,
Paragraph structure, spelling,
and punctuation.
10
Responded to two or more
other students, responses
were substantive.
5
Posted on two or more
different days of the week.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
