Description
To complete this team assignment, first read Assessment of Leading Apparel Specialty Retailers’ CSR Practices as Communicated on Corporate Websites: Problems and OpportunitiesLinks to an external site. to understand various corporate approaches to communicating CSR practices . Then read and critique Danone’s 2022 impact reportLinks to an external site.. Assess Danone’s CSR, sustainability, or citizenship to efforts that address the triple bottom line. Explain the extent to which Danone recognizes and takes responsibility for the various social and environmental and governance impacts of its business that you identify.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Case Study Rubric
Case Study Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeAnalysis &
Evaluation
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeOrganization
& Structure
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeFormat
Ratings
25 pts
Presents a balanced, indepth, and critical
assessment of the facts of
the case in light of
relevant empirical and
theoretical research;
develops insightful and
well-supported
conclusions using
reasoned, sound, and
informed judgments
10 pts
Good Structure of
the paragraphs are
clear and easy to
follow.
15 pts
Provides an acceptable
analysis of most of the
issues and problems in
the case; in most
instances, analysis is
adequately supported by
theory and empirical
data; appropriate
conclusions are outlined
and summarized
5 pts
Fair Structure of the
paragraphs are not easy to
follow. – Paragraph
transitions need
improvement.
10 pts
Good Report follows
designated guidelines.
Report is the appropriate
length as required for the
assignment.
5 pts
Fair Report follows
most guidelines. –
Report is too long
or too short.
10 pts
Simply repeats facts
identified in the case and
does not discuss the
relevance of these facts; fails
to draw conclusions, or
conclusions are not justified
or supported; does not
present relevant research or
data; shows no critical
examination of case issues
2 pts
Poor Organization and structure
detract from the message of the
writer. – Paragraphs are
disjointed and lack transition of
thoughts.
2 pts
Poor Report lacks many elements
of correct formatting. –
Paragraphs are
inadequate/excessive in length.
2
1
1
Case Study Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeGrammar,
Punctuation &
Spelling
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeStakeholder
Perspectives
Ratings
5 pts
Good Rules of grammar,
usage, and punctuation are
followed; spelling is
correct. – Language is
clear and precise;
sentences display
consistently strong, varied
structure.
2.5 pts
Fair Report contains few
grammatical, punctuation
and spelling errors. –
Language lacks clarity or
includes the use of some
jargon or conversational
tone.
0 pts
Poor Report contains
numerous grammatical,
punctuation, and spelling
errors. – Language uses
jargon or conversational
tone
25 pts
Clearly and accurately
describes the unique
perspectives of multiple
key stakeholders in the
case; demonstrates
insightful analysis of
strategic tensions or
conflicts of interest
between the stakeholders
20 pts
With a few minor
exceptions, adequately
identifies and summarizes
the perspectives of the
principal stakeholders
involved in the case;
outlines some conflicts of
interest between company
stakeholders
10 pts
Does not identify or
explain the perspectives of
any stakeholders involved
in the case, or explanation
is flawed in many respects;
fails to recognize any
differences between the
interests of the various
stakeholders
5
2
Case Study Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeIntegration
and Application
25 pts
Demonstrates welldeveloped ability to
integrate and apply
principles, theories, and
practices in the functional
areas of business to the
analysis of issues in the
case-study; effectively
identifies, examines, and
analyzes important crossfunctional organizational
issues that are important
in the analysis of the casestudy component areas;
identifies and critically
evaluates and assesses key
organizational problems
and challenges, and clearly
justifies strategic
recommendations and
conclusions for action
based on strong analytics
and appropriate principles
in the business functional
areas
Total Points: 100
15 pts
Exhibits satisfactory
application of principles,
theories, and practices in
the functional areas of
business to the analysis of
the case-study; with a few
minor exceptions, the case
analysis outlines and
describes some crossfunctional organizational
issues that are relevant to
the development of
organizational strategy;
the case analysis
adequately identifies
relevant organizational
problems and challenges,
and lists strategic
recommendations and
conclusions for action that
are, for the most part,
based on appropriate
principles and concepts in
the functional areas of
business
10 pts
Shows little or no ability to
employ theory and
practice in the functional
areas of business in the
assessment of problems
and issues in the casestudy; does not recognize
or correctly identify crossfunctional organizational
issues relevant to the casestudy; the case analysis
does not identify or
adequately evaluate
organizational problems
and challenges in light of
relevant principles,
theories, and practices in
the functional areas of
business; no strategic
recommendations or
conclusions are presented
in the case analysis, or
recommendations and
conclusions are not
appropriately justified or
supported
2
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
