Description
MGTCB/526 Competency 2 Assessment Title: Managing in a Changing Environment Competency Assessment Title: Aligning Operational Needs with Business Strategies Assignment Directions: Part 1: As a recent hire, you’d like to become familiar with the current organizational structure in your company. This organizational chart (org chart) has not yet been created, so you decide to make your own. Create an org chart of your company. This high-level information is typically found on the company’s website or other websites about the organization. The org chart should include key leadership and level of responsibility. If the information is not public, base your decisions on a similar organization and research. You may use any Microsoft® program or web-based program. Part 2: Review sources on your company. Analyze the company using Porter’s Five Forces. Write a 1,000- to 1,200-word proposal to the company of your plan to align the operational needs with business strategies based on your analysis. Complete the following in your proposal: • Explain in 350 words the structure of your org chart. o Discuss the type of hierarchy and related details of each role. o Assess how each role in the organizational chart is related to the other areas within the organization. Analyze the company based on Porter’s Five Forces. Analyze the effectiveness of the leadership model the company is currently using. o Consider the current leadership style or styles in place at the company. o Determine the effectiveness of the leadership style/s and whether an alternative style/s would be more impactful. Assess how to determine effective leadership. What makes a leader effective or ineffective? o Consider sources of managerial power when leaders are effective. Provide a recommendation for the following actions: o Leadership model changes not reflected in the current organizational chart (Part 1) o 2 or 3 actions needed to align operational needs with business strategies previously identified Include the organizational chart with your proposal
Unformatted Attachment Preview
MGTCB/526 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Managing in a Changing Environment
Competency Assessment Title: Aligning Operational Needs with Business Strategies
Assignment Directions
As a recent hire, you’d like to become familiar with the current organizational structure in your company. This organizational chart (org chart) has
not yet been created, so you decide to make your own.
Create an org chart of your company. This high-level information is typically found on the company’s website or other websites about the
organization. The org chart should include key leadership and level of responsibility. If the information is not public, base your decisions on a
similar organization and research. You may use any Microsoft® program or web-based program.
Review sources on your company. Analyze the company using Porter’s Five Forces.
Write a 1,000- to 1,200-word proposal to the company of your plan to align the operational needs with business strategies based on your analysis.
Complete the following in your proposal:
•
•
•
•
•
Explain in 350 words the structure of your org chart.
o Discuss the type of hierarchy and related details of each role.
o Assess how each role in the organizational chart is related to the other areas within the organization.
Analyze the company based on Porter’s Five Forces.
Analyze the effectiveness of the leadership model the company is currently using.
o Consider the current leadership style or styles in place at the company.
o Determine the effectiveness of the leadership style/s and whether an alternative style/s would be more impactful.
Assess how to determine effective leadership. What makes a leader effective or ineffective?
o Consider sources of managerial power when leaders are effective.
Provide a recommendation for the following actions:
o Leadership model changes not reflected in the current organizational chart (Part 1)
o 2 or 3 actions needed to align operational needs with business strategies previously identified
Include the organizational chart with your proposal.
Submit your proposal.
Copyright 2020 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
MGTCB/526 Competency 2 Rubric
Page 2 of 2
Competency Assessment Rubric
Assignment/Performance
Criteria
Mastery
100%
Meets Expectations
85%
Not Met
0%
1. Organizational Chart
(weight 5%)
The organizational chart clearly
defines the key leadership and
level of responsibility.
The organizational chart somewhat
clearly defines the key leadership
and level of responsibility.
The organizational chart does not
define the key leadership and level
of responsibility.
2. Analysis based on
Porter’s Five Forces
(weight 20%)
Analysis based on Porter’s Five
Forces was comprehensive.
Analysis based on Porter’s Five
Forces was moderate
Analysis based on Porter’s Five
Forces was limited or no attempt for
an analysis based on Porter’s Five
Forces was made.
3. Analysis of current
contingency leadership
mode
(weight 20%)
An analysis on the effectiveness
of the current contingency
leadership model the company is
using was comprehensive.
An analysis on the effectiveness of
the current contingency leadership
model the company was moderate.
An analysis on the effectiveness of
the current contingency leadership
model the company is using was
limited or no attempt at an analysis
on the effectiveness of the current
contingency leadership model the
company is using was made.
4. Leadership model
recommendation
(weight 25%)
The leadership model
recommendation was
comprehensive.
The leadership model
recommendation was average.
The leadership model
recommendation was limited or no
attempt at a recommendation for
leadership model changes was
made.
5. Other identified actions
recommendation
(weight 20%)
Recommendations to further
align operational needs with
business strategies were fully
complete.
Recommendations to further align
operational needs with business
strategies were somewhat complete.
Recommendations to further align
operational needs with business
strategies were incomplete no
attempt was made at a
recommendation for further actions
needed to align operational needs
with business strategies.
6. Information literacy
(weight 10%)
Fully integrated relevant
supporting evidence from quality
sources.
Mostly integrated relevant
supporting evidence from quality
sources.
Minimally integrated relevant
supporting evidence from quality
sources no attempt was made to
submit supporting evidence.
Copyright 2020 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
