Description
I’m looking for an answer for one question which related to the attached Amazon.com Supply Chain Management case study. ”What are the challenges Amazon faces, and what are the implications for its supply chain?” 15 mins presentation in PPT file ( high quality content , professional & simple ) + Word File detailed answer explanations.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Amazon.com Supply Chain Management
Operation Management (Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women)
Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
W18451
AMAZON.COM: SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT1
Ken Mark wrote this case under the supervision of Professor P. Fraser Johnson solely to provide material for class discussion. The
authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised
certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality.
This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the
permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights
organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western
University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t) 519.661.3208; (e) [email protected]; www.iveycases.com.
Copyright © 2018, Ivey Business School Foundation
Version: 2021-11-12
On January 31, 2018, the market capitalization of Amazon.Com Inc. (Amazon) hit $702 billion, the
highest level ever.2 When its fourth-quarter results were released on February 1, 2018, Amazon showed a
30-per-cent increase in revenues, to $60.5 billion for the quarter, and net income for the quarter had
increased by 150 per cent, to $1.9 billion.3 From its start as a venture looking to build “earth’s largest
bookstore” in 1994, Amazon was now one of the most valuable companies in the world, and founder Jeff
Bezos was the richest person on earth.
In 2018, Amazon had an online store that sold its own products and listed products for sale by more than
two million third-party sellers.4 Since its founding, Amazon had added more than 30 store categories,
ranging from electronics to furniture, selling millions of different products and making an estimated 1.2
billion domestic customer shipments in 2017.5 Amazon Web Services, the company’s on-demand cloudcomputing service, generated $17.5 billion in sales in 2017. Amazon Prime Video had become a leader in
video-streaming services, with original-content series and movies that rivalled the offerings of Netflix. Its
Echo devices, powered by the artificial-intelligence assistant Alexa, had more than 30,000 skills and
could be used to control smart-home devices. The popular Kindle e-reader boosted sales of Amazon ebooks. Amazon had increased its number of brick-and-mortar stores with the acquisition of Whole Foods
Market (Whole Foods) in 2017. It had also opened AmazonFresh and Amazon Go grocery stores, as well
as Amazon bookstores.
With total shipping costs that exceeded $21 billion in the most recent fiscal year,6 the company was
taking steps to gain greater control of its supply chain—a strategy that could eventually put Amazon in
direct competition with United Parcel Service of America Inc. (UPS) and Federal Express Corporation
(FedEx). In recent years, it had expanded into ocean freight forwarding, opened an air cargo hub, built a
truck fleet, and established a parcel delivery network.7 The company offered its third-party sellers
fulfillment services called Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA), which provided transportation, warehousing,
picking, packing, shipping, customer service, and returns for products sold through its website. The
company’s latest initiative, Shipping with Amazon, was a new service for any business offering package
delivery to customers, regardless of whether they sold products on the Amazon site.8
From a standing start, Amazon—with 566,000 employees (referred to as “Amazonians”)—had become
more valuable than Walmart Inc. (Walmart), the world’s largest retailer. However, given the broad variety
and volume of products Amazon was selling through a range of formats, a key challenge for the
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 2
9B18D017
company’s founder and chief executive officer, Jeff Bezos, was how to structure Amazon’s supply chain
to support the company’s strategy and growth objectives. What supply chain capabilities would Amazon
need as its business model continued to evolve?
THE RETAIL INDUSTRY
Total U.S. retail sales were estimated at $5.1 trillion in 2017,1 of which e-commerce represented
approximately $450 billion.9 U.S. e-commerce sales were forecast to reach $640 billion by 2020.10
Globally, retail sales were projected to reach $27.73 trillion in 2020,11 and e-commerce’s share was
expected to increase from 10.2 per cent in 2017 to 15.5 per cent in 2020.12
Amazon was the world’s largest online retailer and a competitor to traditional retailers, such as Walmart
and Target Corporation (Target) (see Exhibits 1 and 2). By comparison, Walmart had generated an
estimated $11.5 billion from e-commerce sales in the fiscal year ending January 2018, representing a 44per-cent increase over the previous year.13 Walmart had been working to catch up to Amazon; it had
purchased the online retailer Jet.com for $3.3 billion in August 2016 to augment its Walmart.com site. 14
As an indication of Amazon’s lead in the e-commerce space, Target had generated $706 million in ecommerce sales for the second quarter of 2017, an annualized run rate of $2.8 billion.15
Traditional Retail Supply Chain
The standard supply chain for retailers such as Walmart, Target, and Tesco PLC (Tesco) was driven by
the orders retail buyers placed with suppliers, who coordinated the delivery of goods for sale. A
significant portion of general merchandise was manufactured in Asia, and in 2016, U.S. retailers imported
$479 billion of goods from China.16
Deciding what to place on shelves was a significant task for a store that could have more than 100,000
different items. Category buyers were responsible for selecting and pricing merchandise. Large retailers
had approximately 40 categories, including housewares, toys, and fashion. A buyer normally set the
assortment plan from quarter to quarter, accounting for changes in customer demand due to seasonal
events such as Christmas, Easter, and back-to-school sale periods. In order to clear out inventory to make
room for new product for the next season, retailers used a variety of approaches, including price discounts
or markdowns, selling product to discount stores such as Nordstrom Rack, or returning goods to
suppliers. It was estimated that end-of-season markdowns and discounting cost U.S. fashion retailers an
average of 30 per cent of revenues.17
Since the 1990s, retailers had partially offloaded the responsibility for category management to category
captains—key supplier partners with the capabilities to analyze, review, and plan the assortment
recommendations for product categories such as toothpaste, shaving products, and cough and cold
medication. At Walmart, for example, there were 40,000 suppliers; this included just 200 strategic
suppliers, such as large consumer packaged goods firms Procter & Gamble Company and General Mills
Inc.18 Retailers provided suppliers with access to sales, inventory, and other data in real time, using online
information portals such as Walmart’s Retail Link network. Analysts working for suppliers downloaded
and reviewed this data and then brought their recommendations to category buyers, who had the final say
over approving these assortment recommendations, called “planograms.”
1
U.S. retail trade statistics were broadly based and included retail stores, food services, and automobile dealership sectors.
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 3
9B18D017
It was often challenging for small and medium-sized businesses to sell products to large retailers. First, it
was difficult to secure meetings with buyers, who were likely to stay with proven product assortment
plans and less likely to devote shelf space to unproven new items. It generally took six to eight months for
new products to be added to shelves, as assortment plans were developed and current merchandise was
phased out.
Retailers and large suppliers tended to outsource a large portion of their logistics needs, starting at the
suppliers’ factory gates and ending at retailers’ distribution centres (DCs). They relied on third-party
logistics providers and freight forwarders to ensure timely shipping and delivery of goods, which could
involve a combination of marine, rail, and truck transport. Goods were shipped in bulk—in container
loads—from supplier factories and then consolidated, broken apart into cases, and stored. Retailers
shipped mixed batches of cases from their DCs in full trucks to stores. At the store, employees placed the
goods in inventory in the backroom warehouse, re-stocking shelves as required. While money was
collected from customers immediately, payments to suppliers were generally made in 30 to 60 days.
Retailers had to deal with one final logistics piece after the product was sold: the returns process.
Retailers worked with manufacturers to determine how best to handle returns. This service was often
outsourced to firms such as FedEx Supply Chain and Optoro Inc.
The retailing boom in the United States, which started in the 1950s, had left the country “overstored”—
with too much retail capacity in relation to demand—and consumer traffic in malls had been declining
steadily since 2014.19 The Wall Street Journal noted that the United States had more than five times the
gross leasable retail space per capita than the United Kingdom and that, in 2018, U.S. retailers were on
track to close more than 8,600 locations, which would eclipse the number of store closures during the
2008 recession.20
AMAZON.COM
In 1994, Jeff Bezos quit his job as vice-president of D.E. Shaw, a Wall Street investment management firm,
and moved to Seattle, Washington, to start Cadabra, Inc., which he later re-named Amazon.com (Amazon).
He started to sell books online because books were low-price items with a large variety of categories.
Amazon went public in May 1997, raising $54 million on the Nasdaq stock exchange. 21 Its online retail
store grew in the years after the dotcom boom ended, a period during which there were few, if any,
serious competitors. Starting in 2000, Amazon allowed third parties to sell on its site. It also acquired
other online booksellers, such as Bookpages Ltd. in the United Kingdom and Telebook Inc. in Germany,
and rebranded them as Amazon sites.
Amazon moved beyond books in an attempt to broaden the appeal of its online store, buying online
retailers specializing in various niche markets. A few of these included drugstore.com, Diapers.com,
Audible.com, and Zappos.com.
To attract more users, Amazon started offering a service called Amazon Prime for a flat fee of $75 per year
in 2005. Prime offered members free two-day shipping on eligible items, access to Prime Video and Prime
Music, and free online books.22 In about 5,000 cities and towns, Prime offered customers free same-day and
one-day delivery for more than one million items. In selected areas, Prime offered two-hour deliveries on
tens of thousands of items through its Prime Now hubs.23 As of April 2018, there were over 100 million
Prime members, who spent an average of about $1,300 a year on Amazon’s website, significantly more than
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 4
9B18D017
the $700 spent by non-members. In April 2018, Amazon announced that it was increasing the annual price
of its Prime membership by 20 per cent, to $119, citing rising costs and expanded services, such as an
expanded library of streaming music and videos.24 In 2017, Amazon had generated about $9.72 billion in
revenues from subscription services, which included fees from Prime members.25
Amazon also branched out beyond online retail, starting Amazon Web Services (AWS)—a data services
firm that originally provided information on Internet traffic patterns—in 2006. In 2018, AWS provided
more than 90 cloud-computing services, including networking, storage, analytics, mobile, and tools for
machine learning, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things. Its most popular services included
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud and Amazon Simple Storage Service.26
Amazon also started testing physical store concepts such as AmazonFresh grocery stores in 2007 and
bookstores in 2015. It made a more significant commitment to brick-and-mortar retail when it purchased
Whole Foods for $13.7 billion on June 16, 2017, signalling that it had serious intentions of capturing a
greater share of the $800-billion-per-year U.S. grocery market. Although online sales accounted for an
estimated 3 per cent of the U.S. grocery market in 2017, this segment was expected to increase
dramatically in the next five years. Amazon’s total grocery sales in 2017 were an estimated $2 billion.27
When the Whole Foods deal was announced, Amazon’s market capitalization jumped by $15.6 billion.28
Amazon had succeeded because, according to Amazon’s chief technology officer, Werner Vogels, it had
relied on several key building blocks and the “flywheel effect”—the concept that core technology pieces,
once assembled, could drive other positive effects and innovations—to maintain its technological edge
over rivals (see Exhibit 3). As Vogels commented during BoxWorks, a tech show, “We may be a retailer,
but we are a tech company at heart. When Jeff started Amazon, he didn’t start it to open [a] book shop.
He was fascinated by the Internet. We are missionaries. It’s why we do innovation, to make life better for
our customers.”29 This innovation was illustrated in the development of important Amazon products and
services over the years (see Exhibit 4).
THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMAZON’S SUPPLY CHAIN
Amazon’s distribution network started with the building in 1994 of two warehouses, which Amazon
called fulfillment centres, in Seattle and Delaware. The Seattle fulfillment centre was 8,640 square metres
(93,000 square feet) and resembled other retailers’ fulfillment centres with manual receiving,
warehousing, picking, packaging, and shipping operations. Boxes were packed, taped, and weighed, and
then they were shipped by either U.S. Postal Service (USPS) or UPS, arriving at the customer’s location
within one to seven days.30 The Delaware fulfillment centre was larger—18,766 square metres (202,000
square feet). In 1999, the company opened five more fulfillment centres as well as its first European
fulfillment centres—two in Germany (Regensburg and Bad Hersfeld) and one in Marston Gate, United
Kingdom. Six years passed before Amazon opened more fulfillment centres, in 2005.
In 2006, Amazon created FBA, a service that managed the fulfillment process for its third-party sellers.
Third-party sellers could manage their own inventory and ship directly to Amazon customers (for which
they would be reimbursed the standard shipping and packaging fees), or they could outsource inventory
storage, picking, shipping, customer service, and returns to Amazon through FBA (see Exhibit 5).
In 2013, it was reported that Amazon had launched an umbrella project, code named “Dragon Boat,” to
expand its fulfillment capabilities. This initiative aimed to create a global delivery network to facilitate the
movement of goods from China and India to Amazon DCs in the United States and the United Kingdom.31
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 5
9B18D017
The volume of Amazon orders overwhelmed UPS and other carriers during the 2013 Christmas holiday
season. Late deliveries of customer orders reportedly cost Amazon millions of dollars in refunds and
motivated management to embark on plans to build its own last-mile delivery network.32
In 2016, Amazon created a venture named “Global Supply Chain by Amazon” that featured Amazon as a
global logistics provider, targeting all services, including trucking, freight forwarding, and customer
delivery. According to Amazon, it would be a “revolutionary system that will automate the entire
international supply chain and eliminate much of the legacy waste associated with document handling and
freight booking.”33 This initiative would see Amazon purchase space, in bulk, on airplanes, trucks, and
ships, allowing it to bypass brokers and thereby reduce logistics costs. Amazon added that sellers would
no longer book with DHL, UPS, or FedEx, but would book directly with Amazon. The ease and
transparency of this disintermediation would be revolutionary, and sellers would flock to FBA, given the
competitive pricing.34
Whole Foods sourced products from local, regional, and national producers. It had three seafood
processing and distribution facilities, a specialty coffee and tea procurement and roasting operation, and
11 regional DCs that focused primarily on distributing perishables to stores across the United States,
Canada, and the United Kingdom. In addition, Whole Foods had three regional commissary kitchens and
four bake-house facilities, all of which distributed products to its stores. Other products were typically
procured through a combination of specialty wholesalers and direct distributors. United Natural Foods
Incorporated (UNFI) was the company’s largest third-party supplier, accounting for approximately
32 per cent of its total purchases in 2016.35
To make Whole Foods more attractive to customers, Amazon reduced prices in 2017 on a selection of
best-selling grocery staples.36 With an estimated 62 per cent of Whole Foods customers—about eight
million people—maintaining Amazon Prime memberships, there were cross-selling opportunities as well.
Amazon had plans to sell electronic goods at Whole Foods and offer special in-store discounts to its
Prime members.37
Amazon also planned to use Whole Foods’ 400-plus stores as pickup locations for groceries and to handle
returns.38 The chain’s stores and supply chain provided Amazon with access to the refrigerated
distribution system its existing network lacked, which it could use to supply home delivery of groceries.
Meanwhile, the Whole Foods supply chain would benefit from being part of Amazon, with its greater
purchasing power and opportunities to achieve cost efficiencies.39 In February 2018, Amazon announced
it would start delivering Whole Foods groceries via its Prime Now hubs in four markets. Amazon’s
supply chain had evolved over time (see Exhibit 6), and Prime Now was Amazon’s fastest delivery
option, with one- and two-hour delivery service.40
AMAZON’S SUPPLY CHAIN IN 2018
Traditional retailers purchased goods from manufacturers in bulk and took receipt, in full container loads,
at their DCs. In contrast, Amazon’s strategy was to control the shipment of goods across the entire supply
chain, including procurement, shipment to DCs, and final customer delivery. As of November 2017,
Amazon had 573 million products for sale on its website in what seemed like an unlimited number of
categories and subcategories.41 The category on Amazon.com with the most sales in 2017—more than
$8 billion—was the company’s consumer electronics division, which included Fire tablets, laptops,
headphones, and other computer components. Home and kitchen, publishing (including books), and
sports and outdoors were other top-grossing categories.42
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 6
9B18D017
Amazon had first-party, second-party, and third-party sellers. A first-party seller was a manufacturer that
sold product directly to Amazon. The online labelling for these items stated, “Ships from and sold by
Amazon.com.” For these products, Amazon was the merchant of record (MOR) and the legal owner of
the inventory prior to delivery. Second-party sellers were resellers that bought from brands or
manufacturers and then sold the product to Amazon. Amazon was the MOR for second-party products.
Lastly, third-party sellers relied on Amazon’s marketplace to sell directly to customers. These third-party
sellers were the MOR for their products.
Amazon’s buyers purchased and priced goods for sale on the Amazon site, placing orders to replenish
inventory. Third-party sellers could quickly and conveniently list products for sale in 20 low-risk
categories, such as stationery, books, clothing, cell phones, beauty, baby products, and fashion jewellery.
Product categories that required approval included collectible coins, fine jewellery, automotive and power
sports products, sports collectibles, and watches.43 For other categories, including packaged food, sellers
were required to apply for verification and approval to ensure they met applicable government standards.
Amazon had more than two million third-party sellers worldwide, including more than one million small
businesses in the United States.44 In 2017, for the first time, more than half of the units sold on Amazon’s
site were from third-party sellers.45 Third-party sellers accounted for 26 per cent of Amazon’s order
volume in units in 2007. Ten years later, third-party seller volume represented approximately 51 per cent
of the total units shipped, while revenue from third-party seller services46 was $32 billion.47
PROCUREMENT
Amazon purchased products for resale on its site, acting as the MOR. Its buyers purchased goods for
resale, pulling product from manufacturers’ warehouses on a weekly basis. Each Monday, Amazon’s
buyers would send, electronically, a list of purchase orders for items that manufacturers would then ship
to one of the company’s 122 fulfillment centres. Suppliers, second-party sellers, and third-party sellers
would log into Vendor Central, Amazon’s ordering application, and download the orders as Excel or PDF
files. Amazon typically offered suppliers the option of receiving orders in multiples of up to six units.
Thus, if a particular fulfillment centre needed only one unit, Amazon would wait until it could trigger a
six-unit order before issuing the purchase order.
Suppliers could enter shipping details on Vendor Central, follow up with tracking numbers, and submit
invoices. Amazon typically offered payment terms in the 90- to 120-day range. The features of Vendor
Central contrasted starkly with the ordering systems of most brick-and-mortar retailers, who continued to
rely on a system of emailed or faxed purchase orders and manual invoice processing. One exception was
Walmart, with its Retail Link system.
WAREHOUSING AND DELIVERY
Amazon’s distribution network consisted of a network of sortation centres, fulfillment centres, Prime
Hubs, outbound sortation centres, and delivery stations. In April 2018, it had 122 fulfillment centres and
207 other DCs in the United States. These other facilities and services included eight inbound sortation
centres; 122 fulfillment centres; 39 outbound sortation centres; 33 fresh food DCs, including Whole
Foods DCs; 53 Prime Now hubs; and 71 Amazon Flex services delivery stations (see Exhibit 7).
The typical flow for goods through Amazon’s distribution system was as follows: Product from overseas
arrived at one of Amazon’s inbound sortation centres before being sent to a fulfillment centre. Domestic
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 7
9B18D017
suppliers often shipped goods directly to fulfillment centres. From the fulfillment centres, product
followed one of three channels. First, it could be shipped to FedEx or UPS, who handled customer
delivery. A second option was for it to be sent as part of a truckload of packages to an outbound sortation
centre, where packages would be sorted and loaded together with other packages destined for a similar
ZIP code; these shipments would go to the USPS, and letter carriers would deliver them to customers. A
third option was for shipments to go from outbound sortation centres to an Amazon delivery station or
hub, where local couriers or Amazon Flex drivers would deliver the packages to customers.48
In October 2017, Amazon introduced Amazon Key, a smart lock system. One feature of this system was
the ability to allow Amazon couriers access to customers’ homes to place packages inside.49
Fulfillment Centres
Amazon’s fulfillment centres were warehouses where product was stored, picked, and shipped. Individual
fulfillment centres focused on specific types of product, such as small sortable, large sortable, large nonsortable, specialty apparel and footwear, specialty small parts, and returns. Small sortable fulfillment
centres handled items smaller than a typical box in length, which could be placed in totes and ferried
around on conveyor belts. These items included books, small electronics, and watches. Large sortable
fulfillment centres looked after products that were too large to fit in typical 18-inch boxes and that could
not be sorted easily.50 For example, the Arizona PHX3 facility was dedicated to apparel and footwear; the
California LGB4 facility was for large items such as sports equipment, patio furniture, and pet food;
Indiana IND5 was for large non-sortable items and for hazardous materials (hazmat) merchandise; and
Illinois MDW4 was for apparel, shoes, watches, and jewellery.51
In an effort to control logistics costs, Amazon invested heavily in warehouse automation. It acquired Kiva
Systems in 2012 and later re-named it Amazon Robotics. This division designed and installed warehouse
automation systems exclusively for Amazon. Amazon Robotics automated fulfillment centres with the
latest technology, such as autonomous robots and associated systems, control software, and devices that
incorporated innovative tools such as computer vision, depth sensing, and object recognition.52
Fresh Food Distribution Centres
Amazon had a separate set of DCs for fresh food and cold storage grocery. These facilities had
refrigeration and infrastructure to handle perishable soft foods. Amazon had retained the Whole Foods
DCs to focus on serving physical stores and to augment Amazon’s online perishables orders.53
Prime Now Hubs
Through its Prime subscription service, Amazon offered special items for rapid shipment to Prime
members in select markets. Prime Now Hubs were smaller buildings—about 1,765–4,645 square metres
(19,000–50,000 square feet)—located in or near urban centres. They warehoused a small subset of the
fastest-moving items that were available to Prime subscribers—about 15,000 stock-keeping units.
Delivery for these items was made as little as 60 minutes after customers placed their online orders.54
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 8
9B18D017
Outbound Sortation Centres
Goods ready for shipment from fulfillment centres were also sent to outbound sortation centres (OSCs).
Unlike in a traditional order-fulfillment process, where packaged orders went straight to the shipper for
sorting and shipping, Amazon OSCs received, sorted, and packaged orders before delivering them to the
shippers. Amazon coined the term “sortation centre” in 2014 when it opened its first such centre in Kent,
Washington.55 According to Amazon, “Our sortation centers are at the intersection of our passion between
our transportation and logistics networks and help us provide our Prime members with their orders in two
days or less.”56
Outbound sortation centres allowed Amazon to have greater control over the outbound transportation of
packages. By identifying opportunities to rely on low-cost carriers, such as the USPS, local couriers, and
independent Amazon Flex drivers, OSCs aimed to divert volume away from UPS and FedEx. In 2017,
3 per cent of FedEx’s revenues came from Amazon, compared to 7 per cent at UPS.57
Amazon Flex
Amazon Flex was a program that started in February 2016. Similar to Uber, but for package delivery, it
enabled contract drivers to make $18 to $25 dollars per hour delivering Amazon packages within select
metropolitan areas. The first four cities to use Amazon Flex were Seattle, Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Dallas.
Drivers signed up through a mobile application (app), similar to that provided by Uber. Amazon was
looking to save costs by using Flex drivers instead of dedicated local couriers, which could charge
35 per cent of the total shipping cost to deliver goods in the last mile.58
Delivery Stations
Instead of being directed to OSCs, product from fulfillment centres could go to delivery stations.
Amazon’s delivery station network (DSN) facilities were similar to OSCs, but with key differentiating
features. First, they were smaller—5,574–9,290 square metres (60,000–100,000 square feet)—and they
were nested within larger metropolitan centres. Second, DSNs focused on last-mile and rapid outbound
shipments within a tightly confined urban region. Third, DSNs relied heavily on contractors, such as
independent Amazon Flex drivers, to deliver packages.59
Transportation
Amazon started building its truck fleet in 2015 to take increased control over shipments to and between
its fulfillment centres and sortation centres.60 In July 2017, Amazon was also leasing 40 cargo planes as
part of its logistics network.61 In January 2017, Amazon relied on its freight forwarding arm, set up in
Beijing in October 2016, to arrange the transportation of goods from China to North America.62
Amazon shipping costs included the costs of sortation and delivery centres and transportation costs; these
were $4 billion in 2011, $5.1 billion in 2012, $6.6 billion in 2013, $8.7 billion in 2014, $11.5 billion in
2015, $16.2 billion in 2016, and $21.7 billion in 2017.63 Total fulfillment expenses (see Exhibit 8) did not
include shipping costs. Management expected that shipping costs would increase as more consumers
became Prime members and accepted two-day shipping offers. To offset these shipping costs, the
company was working to optimize delivery operations by investing in new technologies and negotiating
better prices with suppliers as volumes increased.
This document is authorized for use only in Priyamvada Mathur’s Business Process at Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University For Women (IGDTUW) from Aug 2022 to Jan 2023.
Downloaded by Faisal Al-Jassim ([email protected])
lOMoARcPSD|16892266
Page 9
9B18D017
Physical Store Network
As of January 2018, Amazon’s brick-and-mortar store network consisted primarily of 465 North
American and seven international Whole Foods stores. Other locations included 12 bookstores in the
United States and an experimental Amazon Go grocery store in Seattle. Amazon opened its first
bookstore in November 2015 at Seattle’s University Village shopping centre, and it had 11 other locations
across the United States. It planned to open more bookstores in Walnut Creek, California; Austin, Texas;
and Washington, D.C. In the third quarter of 2017, Amazon began reporting sales from its physical stores,
with sales reaching $1.3 billion in the quarter.64
BUILDING A GLOBAL LOGISTICS GIANT
In 2018, Amazon was both a retailer of merchandise and digital content and an operator of a chain of
grocery stores and a chain of bookstores, and it had more than 300 million customers around the world. It
contributed about 4 per cent of total U.S. retail sales, and its market share of the e-commerce segment was
estimated to be approximately 43 per cent. By comparison, its two closest competitors, eBay and
Walmart, had 7.4 per cent and 4.3 per cent of the U.S. e-commerce market, respectively.65 In
