Description
Successful completion of a doctoral dissertation requires significant amounts of independent reading on the research topic. This allows the doctoral learner/researcher to become familiar with the scope of the topic and to identify gaps or tensions within the existing literature on the topic. These gaps and tensions become the source of the dissertation research. In this assignment, you will read and annotate potential sources in your dissertation field of interest. Those demonstrating the most merit to the best of your understanding of the topic at this time should be added to your RefWorks list for potential inclusion in the literature review section of your dissertation.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Locate the assignment submission for “Literature Review Resources” from your previous courses. You will add to this document to begin building a running literature review.
It is recommended that you engage in this activity throughout the duration of this course.
Instructors will be scoring your submission based on the number of unique sources identified in the list submitted.
Download the resource “Literature Review Resources Tool” (if needed) and use it to complete the assignment.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
Refer to “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Directions:
Read at least 10 empirical articles in your general dissertation field that you have not read previously.
In the “Literature Review Resources” document that you submitted in RES-811, provide the following for each source that you are adding to the document:
The APA-formatted citation.
A brief annotation of the key points of the source.
An indication of whether the source has been added to (Y) or excluded from (N) your RefWorks list.
Highlight the additions to the document so the instructor can readily identify them.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
College of Doctoral Studies
Empirical Research Checklist for 2 Articles
Article 1
Article Citation (APA format):
Kottke, J., & Pelletier, K. (2013). Measuring and differentiating perceptions of supervisor and
top leader ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 415-428. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-13128
http://library.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=
bth&AN=87015723&site=eds-live&scope=site
Section
Defining Characteristic
Contained in
Article
(Give page
number)
Abstract
An abstract of the contents is provided.
415
The purpose of the study is stated.
416
Introduction
Methods
416
The hypothesis or research question is
stated.
X
Key concepts and terms are noted.
415
A review of the literature is provided.
416
A description of the population sample is
provided.
416
The data collection procedure is presented. 417
Other procedures to be used are described.
Results
(X)
X
The scope of the study is stated.
A rationale for the study is provided.
Not
Contained in
Article
A narrative statement of the findings is
given.
A description of the data collected is
given.
Findings are supported by graphs and
charts.
The analysis of the data is explained.
417
X
4171
X
425
© 2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
College of Doctoral Studies
Conclusion
References
A summary of the study is provided.
426
Conclusions related to the hypothesis are
stated.
Questions for future research are
presented.
References used in the study are
presented.
426
426
426
© 2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
College of Doctoral Studies
Article 2
Article Citation (APA format):
Carneiro, J. A. S., Cardoso, A., Santos, F. P., Milagre, S. T., Lamounier, E. A., & Oliveira, L.
C. (2023, June). Ethical Aspects in a Virtual Reality Environment. In 2023 18th Iberian
Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Section
Abstract
Defining Characteristic
Contained
Not
in Article Contained
in
(Give page
Article(X)
number)
An abstract of the contents is provided.
1
The purpose of the study is stated.
1
The scope of the study is stated.
1
A rationale for the study is provided.
1
Introduction
The hypothesis or research question is stated.
X
Key concepts and terms are noted.
X
A review of the literature is provided.
Methods
2
A description of the population sample is provided.
X
The data collection procedure is presented.
X
Other procedures to be used are described.
X
A narrative statement of the findings is given.
X
A description of the data collected is given.
X
Findings are supported by graphs and charts.
X
The analysis of the data is explained.
X
A summary of the study is provided.
X
Results
Conclusion
Conclusions related to the hypothesis are stated.
4
Questions for future research are presented.
3
© 2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
College of Doctoral Studies
References
References used in the study are presented.
4
© 2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
