Description
The a-s-s-e-s-s-m-e-n-t willbe 2000 words long.Please see the questions shown in the screenshot. I will send you all the info after being hired, eg PPTs, student access etc. Please send a draft in 12hrs -1 day time, day 2, and day 3 as well. + Will need to draft some questions to ask the teacher and revise base on feedback (Send bk ard in 1 day max)
Unformatted Attachment Preview
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
Literature Review (Individual Assessment)
Due: Friday, March 22 (5pm)
Worth: 30%
Word count: 2000 words (excluding references and appendixes)
Your assignment requires you to conduct a literature review that is based on the challenge that your
group decides to work on set by the company. Based on the content (readings, lecture materials, and
the case study) from weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, choose a topic of your literature review based on the
challenge that your group decides to work on. The literature review and the reviewed articles must
draw on and be linked to change management concepts.
The literature review’s content must include the following sections and be structured
accordingly:
Your literature review should contain at least the following sections as outlined below. You are
welcome to include additional sections and headings but as a minimum your report should include
the following sections:
1. Title page – A professionally presented title page containing your personal details and the title of
your paper. The title of the paper should reflect the topic you have chosen to focus on.
2. Introduction – You should write a brief introduction to your literature review detailing what the
reader can expect to find in the literature review. You also should explain the topic covered in the
literature review based on the case study from.
3. Literature review – There are 2 parts to the literature review section of the assignment.
1. Please use AI to develop a literature review on one of the topics from ZURU and Southern
Stations Wagyu (SSW) case studies, that your group decides to work on.
2. Critique the generated by AI review based on the literature that you have found. You need to
have at least 10 academic articles and any other required resources to support your
justifications for or against AI generated material.
Identify 10 academic articles from peer-reviewed journals on your chosen topic. An academic
article is one which has been published in a quality assured, peer reviewed academic journal. Your
literature review must address the following questions: Which academic journals you used? What is
the purpose of the research reported in the articles? Where was the research carried out (country)?
What methodology was used: qualitative, quantitative or mixed method? How did you analyse the
articles?
Literature review needs to be critical. Based on at least 10 articles, present the key findings from
the literature. Furthermore, identify key themes that have emerged from the 10 articles reviewed.
Please also explain what the links are between these themes. Identify and explain what gaps exist in
the literature. The gaps in the literature should provide you with clear picture of what is missing in
the research on the chosen topic. Explain why filling these gaps is important.
Link the literature review to the case study and critically examine whether what the literature says is
in line with or different from the challenge that your group is working on.
1
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
5. Conclusion – You should provide a comprehensive conclusion to your literature review wherein
you provide a solid summary of your literature review and present key lessons learned from your
literature review in relation to your topic.
6. References section – The reference list must conform to the APA referencing style.
Holding of Copies of Assignments
For quality assurance purposes the School is required to hold on record a number of
assignments/tests as examples of differing standards of work for up to five years. All work will
be held in an electronic form on a secure server and will be anonymised. If you have any
objections to the School holding your assignment/test for this purpose then email the course
coordinator to ensure your work is not used.
University Assessment Policy
The University of Canterbury considers cheating and plagiarism to be serious acts of dishonesty.
This assessment must be your own individual work. You must not copy the work of another
person (e.g. student, internet or published work). Any person, who is found to have copied
someone else’s work – in part or in full – or to have allowed their work to be copied, will receive
a fail grade for this full assessment and may face further disciplinary action.
2
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
APPENDIX 1: APA REFERENCING/CITING
Citing and referencing examples
Citations (direct quotations)
Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon and McBarron (2014: 290-292) suggest “…”.
Schermerhorn et al. (2014: 290-292) suggest “…”.
“…” (Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon, & McBarron, 2014: 290-292).
“…” (Schermerhorn et al., 2014: 290-292).
Citations (paraphrasing/summarising)
Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon and McBarron (2014) suggest
… Schermerhorn et al. (2014) suggest …
… (Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon, & McBarron, 2014).
… (Schermerhorn et al., 2014).
Reference list
Schermerhorn, J. R., Davidson, P., Poole, D., Woods, P., Simon, A., & McBarron, E. (2014).
Management (5th Asia–Pacific ed.). Milton, Australia: Wiley.
Additional information on referencing
For this course you are required to know the APA style of citing and referencing. Most of the
information is available in the short document found through this link:
http://library.canterbury.ac.nz/files/APA_6th_guide.pdf
3
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
APPENDIX 2: INDIVIDUAL COVER SHEET
Family Name:
Given Name:
ID Number:
Course Code: Mgmt301
Course Title: Leading Change and Innovation
Assessment: Literature Review – Individual
Due: Friday, 22 March (5pm)
Lecturer: Anna Earl
STATEMENT REGARDING DISHONEST PRACTICE
(in connection with work submitted for assessment)
The University’s interpretation of what constitutes dishonest practice includes the
following:
1. Plagiarism, being the presentation of any material (text, data or figures, on any
medium including computer files) from any other source without clear and proper
acknowledgement of the source of that material.
2. Collusion*, being work performed in whole or in part in conjunction with another
person or persons, but submitted as if it had been completed by the named author alone
(or joint authors if a group item of work).
3. Copying, being the use of material (in any medium, including computer files)
produced by another person or persons, with or without their knowledge and approval.
4. Ghost writing, being the use of another party (with or without any form of
payment) to prepare all or part of an item of work submitted for assessment.
Under the University Regulations, evidence of any of these or other forms of dishonest
practice by any student(s) represents grounds for disciplinary action and may result in
penalties ranging from denial of credit for the item of work in question to exclusion from
the University.
*This interpretation of the dishonest practice of collusion is not intended to discourage
students from having discussions with each other about how to approach a particular
assigned task, and incorporating general ideas coming out of such discussions into their
own individual submissions.
DECLARATION: I have read and fully understand the statement regarding Dishonest
Practice and hereby certify that this item of work submitted for assessment is entirely my
own work.
Signed:
Date:
4
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
APPENDIX 3: Literature Review Marking Criteria
Literature review marking criteria (100 marks)
How well has the following tasks were completed?
Introduction
10 marks
The introduction provides a clear
2
explanation of the chosen topic,
which should be based on the
case study and class content.
The introduction provides
2
justification for why this topic is
important and how is it relevant
to change management
The introduction provides a clear
2
picture of the key arguments
presented in the literature review
The introduction provides a clear
2
picture of the structure of the
literature review
Literature review
50
The literature review clearly uses
5
AI to develop a literature review
on the chosen topic
The literature review critiques
5
the generated by AI review based
on the literature that you have
found. You need to have at least
10 academic articles and any
other required resources to
support your justifications for or
against AI generated material.
The literature review is based on
10 academic articles
The literature review clearly
explains which academic journals
were used and why
The literature review clearly
explains how the articles were
analysed
The literature review clearly
explains where (country) the
research has been carried out
The literature clearly stated what
methodology has been used
The literature review clearly
explains the key findings from
the literature
The literature review critically
explains the emerging themes
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
from the literature analysis
The literature review clearly
explains the gaps in the literature
on the chosen topic and why
filling these gaps is important
The literature review links the
literature review to the case study
and critically examine whether
what the literature says is in line
with or different from the
challenge that your group is
working on.
Application to change
management
The literature reviews draws on
the course material
The literature review is linked to
change management concepts
Conclusion
The conclusion provides a
concise summary of the key
points in the report
It should present key lessons
learned from your literature
review in relation to your topic.
Technical aspects
The literature review is well
structured and contained within
the word limit
The literature review is
professional presented and
written
The literature review is free of
spelling and grammatical errors
The method of referencing is
correct and consistent and a list
of references is included
All major headings are collated
with the table of contents
Total marks
4
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
20
4
4
4
4
4
100
6
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
Please write according to the Literature Review Marking Criteria
(page5-6)
The case is ZURU, and the challenge 1 inflationsry issue mentioned in
the case was chosen for writing.
Literature Review (Individual Assessment)
Due: Friday, March 22 (5pm)
Worth: 30%
Word count: 2000 words (excluding references and appendixes)
Your assignment requires you to conduct a literature review that is based on the challenge that your
group decides to work on set by the company. Based on the content (readings, lecture materials, and
the case study) from weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, choose a topic of your literature review based on the
challenge that your group decides to work on. The literature review and the reviewed articles must
draw on and be linked to change management concepts.
The literature review’s content must include the following sections and be structured
accordingly:
Your literature review should contain at least the following sections as outlined below. You are
welcome to include additional sections and headings but as a minimum your report should include
the following sections:
1. Title page – A professionally presented title page containing your personal details and the title of
your paper. The title of the paper should reflect the topic you have chosen to focus on.
2. Introduction – You should write a brief introduction to your literature review detailing what the
reader can expect to find in the literature review. You also should explain the topic covered in the
literature review based on the case study from.
3. Literature review – There are 2 parts to the literature review section of the assignment.
1. Please use AI to develop a literature review on one of the topics from ZURU and Southern
Stations Wagyu (SSW) case studies, that your group decides to work on.
2. Critique the generated by AI review based on the literature that you have found. You need to
have at least 10 academic articles and any other required resources to support your
justifications for or against AI generated material.
Identify 10 academic articles from peer-reviewed journals on your chosen topic. An academic
article is one which has been published in a quality assured, peer reviewed academic journal. Your
literature review must address the following questions: Which academic journals you used? What is
the purpose of the research reported in the articles? Where was the research carried out (country)?
What methodology was used: qualitative, quantitative or mixed method? How did you analyse the
articles?
Literature review needs to be critical. Based on at least 10 articles, present the key findings from
the literature. Furthermore, identify key themes that have emerged from the 10 articles reviewed.
Please also explain what the links are between these themes. Identify and explain what gaps exist in
1
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
the literature. The gaps in the literature should provide you with clear picture of what is missing in
the research on the chosen topic. Explain why filling these gaps is important.
Link the literature review to the case study and critically examine whether what the literature says is
in line with or different from the challenge that your group is working on.
5. Conclusion – You should provide a comprehensive conclusion to your literature review wherein
you provide a solid summary of your literature review and present key lessons learned from your
literature review in relation to your topic.
6. References section – The reference list must conform to the APA referencing style.
Holding of Copies of Assignments
For quality assurance purposes the School is required to hold on record a number of
assignments/tests as examples of differing standards of work for up to five years. All work will
be held in an electronic form on a secure server and will be anonymised. If you have any
objections to the School holding your assignment/test for this purpose then email the course
coordinator to ensure your work is not used.
University Assessment Policy
The University of Canterbury considers cheating and plagiarism to be serious acts of dishonesty.
This assessment must be your own individual work. You must not copy the work of another
person (e.g. student, internet or published work). Any person, who is found to have copied
someone else’s work – in part or in full – or to have allowed their work to be copied, will receive
a fail grade for this full assessment and may face further disciplinary action.
2
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
APPENDIX 1: APA REFERENCING/CITING
Citing and referencing examples
Citations (direct quotations)
Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon and McBarron (2014: 290-292) suggest “…”.
Schermerhorn et al. (2014: 290-292) suggest “…”.
“…” (Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon, & McBarron, 2014: 290-292).
“…” (Schermerhorn et al., 2014: 290-292).
Citations (paraphrasing/summarising)
Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon and McBarron (2014) suggest
… Schermerhorn et al. (2014) suggest …
… (Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon, & McBarron, 2014).
… (Schermerhorn et al., 2014).
Reference list
Schermerhorn, J. R., Davidson, P., Poole, D., Woods, P., Simon, A., & McBarron, E. (2014).
Management (5th Asia–Pacific ed.). Milton, Australia: Wiley.
Additional information on referencing
For this course you are required to know the APA style of citing and referencing. Most of the
information is available in the short document found through this link:
http://library.canterbury.ac.nz/files/APA_6th_guide.pdf
3
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
APPENDIX 2: INDIVIDUAL COVER SHEET
Family Name:
Given Name:
ID Number:
Course Code: Mgmt301
Course Title: Leading Change and Innovation
Assessment: Literature Review – Individual
Due: Friday, 22 March (5pm)
Lecturer: Anna Earl
STATEMENT REGARDING DISHONEST PRACTICE
(in connection with work submitted for assessment)
The University’s interpretation of what constitutes dishonest practice includes the
following:
1. Plagiarism, being the presentation of any material (text, data or figures, on any
medium including computer files) from any other source without clear and proper
acknowledgement of the source of that material.
2. Collusion*, being work performed in whole or in part in conjunction with another
person or persons, but submitted as if it had been completed by the named author alone
(or joint authors if a group item of work).
3. Copying, being the use of material (in any medium, including computer files)
produced by another person or persons, with or without their knowledge and approval.
4. Ghost writing, being the use of another party (with or without any form of
payment) to prepare all or part of an item of work submitted for assessment.
Under the University Regulations, evidence of any of these or other forms of dishonest
practice by any student(s) represents grounds for disciplinary action and may result in
penalties ranging from denial of credit for the item of work in question to exclusion from
the University.
*This interpretation of the dishonest practice of collusion is not intended to discourage
students from having discussions with each other about how to approach a particular
assigned task, and incorporating general ideas coming out of such discussions into their
own individual submissions.
DECLARATION: I have read and fully understand the statement regarding Dishonest
Practice and hereby certify that this item of work submitted for assessment is entirely my
own work.
Signed:
Date:
4
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
APPENDIX 3: Literature Review Marking Criteria
Literature review marking criteria (100 marks)
How well has the following tasks were completed?
Introduction
10 marks
The introduction provides a clear
2
explanation of the chosen topic,
which should be based on the
case study and class content.
The introduction provides
2
justification for why this topic is
important and how is it relevant
to change management
The introduction provides a clear
2
picture of the key arguments
presented in the literature review
The introduction provides a clear
2
picture of the structure of the
literature review
Literature review
50
The literature review clearly uses
5
AI to develop a literature review
on the chosen topic
The literature review critiques
5
the generated by AI review based
on the literature that you have
found. You need to have at least
10 academic articles and any
other required resources to
support your justifications for or
against AI generated material.
The literature review is based on
10 academic articles
The literature review clearly
explains which academic journals
were used and why
The literature review clearly
explains how the articles were
analysed
The literature review clearly
explains where (country) the
research has been carried out
The literature clearly stated what
methodology has been used
The literature review clearly
explains the key findings from
the literature
The literature review critically
explains the emerging themes
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
MGMT301 – Leading Change and Innovation
Semester 1, 2024
from the literature analysis
The literature review clearly
explains the gaps in the literature
on the chosen topic and why
filling these gaps is important
The literature review links the
literature review to the case study
and critically examine whether
what the literature says is in line
with or different from the
challenge that your group is
working on.
Application to change
management
The literature reviews draws on
the course material
The literature review is linked to
change management concepts
Conclusion
The conclusion provides a
concise summary of the key
points in the report
It should present key lessons
learned from your literature
review in relation to your topic.
Technical aspects
The literature review is well
structured and contained within
the word limit
The literature review is
professional presented and
written
The literature review is free of
spelling and grammatical errors
The method of referencing is
correct and consistent and a list
of references is included
All major headings are collated
with the table of contents
Total marks
4
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
20
4
4
4
4
4
100
6
ZURU weblite link : https://zuru.com/
Thus is a 2020 Stuff article about ZURU:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/300023709/zuru-from-global-toy-domination-to-vitamins-and-pet-food
This is 2020 Stuff article about ZURU and their operations in China: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/119603998/coronavirus-disruption-will-cost-tens-of-millions-create-product-shortages-toy-company-zuru-says?rm=a
This is a documentary about ZURU on Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7vL0Ykx2ys
The Co-founder of ZURU talks about how Zuru became successful globally : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9uDBqo3C9k
Nick Mowbray, co-founder of ZURU talks about Fast Moving Consumer Goods : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0sl44jBvXE
The Secret to LEGO’s Success – A Platform for Innovation:
https://www.nutanix.com/theforecastbynutanix/podcasts/the-secret-to-lego-success-a-platform-for-inovation
Toy giant Zuru facing legal fight over bid to ID negative review authors: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/300540486/toy-giant-zuru-facing-legal-fight-over-bid-to-id-negative-review-authors
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
