Description
Within INTL 621 you are required to develop a literature review. In this case, it should relate to
the issue you identified in your White Paper Assignment.
A literature review sets the context for a subject by explaining what others have found in
researching the same or similar issues. It is written in a narrative format.
Title Page. Ensure you include your title, student name, date of submission.
Introductory Paragraph. A literature review begins with an introductory paragraph in which
the writer frames the research topic and its significance, and the puzzle that the researcher is
addressing. To do that, the writer will summarize the major relevant arguments on the research
subject, highlighting the main issues and how schools of thought might differ. If there are key
terms to be defined, the writer should do that here. (1 page).
Body. The body of the literature review tells readers what others have found in their studies
about your specific research question (the extent of existing knowledge on your specific research
question), critiques what is right or wrong with these other studies, and discusses how the work
is distinguishable from the research study you are proposing. Your review should organize
material by theme or method or what makes sense for the project. This literature review should
include a critical review of 10-15 appropriate articles, to include scholarly, peer-reviewed
articles, material from government publications and websites, or other topic-appropriate source.
Provide citations for the ideas of different authors. You may use parenthetical citations or
footnotes. If you use parenthetical citations (Author Date) in the text, use “References” format
for the complete citations at the end of the assignment (4-6 pages).
Conclusion
. The conclusion should summarize the primary “sense of the literature”,
encapsulating for the reader where the existing literature ends and your research will start as you
seek to answer the question that still remains and add to the body of knowledge. (1 page)
References. Provide a List of References (or Bibliography if you used notes) in Turabian format.
Complete citations for the articles and sources you used in your literature review.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Assignment 2. Literature Review Assignment
(Due at the End of Week Five: 25% of Grade)
Within INTL 621 you are required to develop a literature review. In this case, it should relate to
the issue you identified in your White Paper Assignment.
A literature review sets the context for a subject by explaining what others have found in
researching the same or similar issues. It is written in a narrative format.
Title Page. Ensure you include your title, student name, date of submission.
Introductory Paragraph. A literature review begins with an introductory paragraph in which
the writer frames the research topic and its significance, and the puzzle that the researcher is
addressing. To do that, the writer will summarize the major relevant arguments on the research
subject, highlighting the main issues and how schools of thought might differ. If there are key
terms to be defined, the writer should do that here. (1 page).
Body. The body of the literature review tells readers what others have found in their studies
about your specific research question (the extent of existing knowledge on your specific research
question), critiques what is right or wrong with these other studies, and discusses how the work
is distinguishable from the research study you are proposing. Your review should organize
material by theme or method or what makes sense for the project. This literature review should
include a critical review of 10-15 appropriate articles, to include scholarly, peer-reviewed
articles, material from government publications and websites, or other topic-appropriate source.
Provide citations for the ideas of different authors. You may use parenthetical citations or
footnotes. If you use parenthetical citations (Author Date) in the text, use “References” format
for the complete citations at the end of the assignment (4-6 pages).
Conclusion. The conclusion should summarize the primary “sense of the literature”,
encapsulating for the reader where the existing literature ends and your research will start as you
seek to answer the question that still remains and add to the body of knowledge. (1 page)
References. Provide a List of References (or Bibliography if you used notes) in Turabian format.
Complete citations for the articles and sources you used in your literature review.
Submission Instructions.
The research proposal must be submitted as a Word Document Attachment in the Assignments
section of the classroom by Sunday, 11.55pm EST at the end of week 5.
3/12/24, 8:44 AM
Assignment 2: Literature Review – INTL621 I001 Winter 2024 – APEI
INTL621 I001 Winter 2024
INTL
Literature
Assignment
Course
Home ContentReview
Discussions
Class Progress Rubric
Course Tools
LD
Library
Help
Course: INTL621 I001 Winter 2024
Assignments
Assignment 2: Literature Review
Literature Review
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion Score
15 points
12.75 points
11.25 points
9.75 points
0 points
/ 15
Assignment 2: Literature Review
Sources and
Source Quality
More than
15
Includes 15
Hide Assignment
Information
Fewer than 10
sources, including
sources, 10 from
sources, 8 from
Turnitin™
13 from peerpeer-reviewed
peer-reviewed
reviewed material.
material. Includes
sources and/or
Includes
a variety
research
sources not
This assignment
will be
submittedprimary
to Turnitin™.
of sources from
and/or articles from appropriate to the
high quality
well-respected
research topic or
Instructions
journals,
journals in the field
question under
Assignment 2. See
government
attached assignment
and government
instructions. investigation.
documents, primary documents, primary
sources and juried
sources, etc.
publications.
Fewer than 8 peerreviewed sources
and/or sources not
appropriate to the
research topic or
question under
investigation. Overreliance on low
quality journals
and/or sources that
are exceptionally
brief.
No sources used.
Due on Mar 17, 2024 11:55 PM
Attachments
05-INTL621-LITERATURE REVIEW.pdf (128.6 KB)
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=162556&db=407700
1/6
3/12/24, 8:44 AM
Literature Review
Introduction
Assignment 2: Literature Review – INTL621 I001 Winter 2024 – APEI
Exemplary
Accomplished
Download All Files
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion Score
10 points
8.5 points
7.5 points
6.5 points
0 points
/ 10
Generally suggests
a question, topic, or
knowledge gap but
not clearly
Topic not identified.
Hide Rubrics
Inquiry question
One element is
Missing two
Rubric Name: and/or
INTL Literature
area of
Review
missingAssignment
or unclear:
elements:
Rubric inquiry
study clearly
inquiry question,
question, area of
described;
area of focus, or
focus, or
significance of the
problem is
addressed (if
literature review is
associated with a
research paper).
Print
significance of the
problem is not
clear.
significance of the
problem is not
defined.
described or
supported.
10 points
Connection to
(0) file(s) to submit
Defined Problem
8.5 points
7.5 points
6.5 points
0 points
Area
Shows thorough
Apparent match
Reader has to
No connection is
evident.
the relationship
Record Audioof
the sources
selected to the
problem area.
area Record
defined
and
Video
selection of
articles/sources,
although perhaps
connection of the
literature to the
problem area by
making a jump. The
Mismatch between
problem area
defined and the
selection of
articles/sources.
not clearly
articulated.
connection is not
clear.
Submit Assignment
Files to submit
After uploading,understanding
you must click
to complete
submission.
of Submit
between
problem the
create
the
Add a File
Submit
Comments
Cancel
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=162556&db=407700
/ 10
2/6
3/12/24, 8:44 AM
Literature Review
Synthesis/Summa
Assignment 2: Literature Review – INTL621 I001 Winter 2024 – APEI
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion Score
20 points
17 points
15 points
13 points
0 points
/ 20
Summarizes and
shows insightful
synthesis of the
literature
Summarizes the
overall picture
obtained from the
literature review
Attempts to
synthesize and
summarize but
misses the point of
Lacks summary or
any synthesis of the
information, leaving
each article as a
No attempt made
to synthesize or
summarize.
information,
including analysis
and synthesizes the
knowledge gained.
incorporating the
inquiry into the
standalone piece
and/or
of gaps in and/or
limitations of the
If required,
connection to
literature. Stacks
sources instead of
misinterprets the
information and
research. Covers all
applicable literature
theoretical
literature needs
weaving them into
the analysis. If
makes statements
unsupported by the
including
theoretical (if
further clarification.
required,
theoretical
literature. If
required,
literature
incorporated is an
ill-fit for the topic
being assessed.
theoretical
literature is not
linked.
ry
required for
research paper).
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=162556&db=407700
3/6
3/12/24, 8:44 AM
Literature Review
Organization
Assignment 2: Literature Review – INTL621 I001 Winter 2024 – APEI
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion Score
15 points
12.75 points
11.25 points
9.75 points
0 points
/ 15
Organization
pattern
Well organized with
organizational plan
The information is
there but is not
No clear
organization or
Unable to
understand the
demonstrates
understanding of
obvious
throughout. The
organized and does
not lead from the
organizational plan
inconsistent.
application of the
literature to the
prior literature and
information on the
literature review
demonstrates that
literature review to
the gap and inquiry.
topic (historical,
general to specific,
the author is
knowledgeable
segments of the
topic, etc.) and
about the prior
research that is
organizational plan
enhances the
presentation,
promoting ease in
important to his or
her topic/research
inquiry.
inquiry question.
reading, and clear
demonstration of
arguments within
the literature.
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=162556&db=407700
4/6
3/12/24, 8:44 AM
Literature Review
Professional
Writing and Style
Assignment 2: Literature Review – INTL621 I001 Winter 2024 – APEI
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Criterion Score
30 points
25.5 points
22.5 points
19.5 points
0 points
/ 30
Contains no
spelling or
grammatical errors,
scholarly/academic
tone is used
throughout, full
Contains few
spelling or
grammatical errors,
scholarly
tone/academic
tone is used
Contains several
spelling or
grammatical errors,
and does not
always use Turabian
style. Uses
Contains many
spelling or
grammatical errors,
and does not
closely follow
Turabian style. Uses
Not written at the
graduate level.
citations for all
sources mentioned,
throughout, missing
few references
excessive direct
quotes (more than
excessive direct
quotes (more than
all listed references
used in the
within the text or
on the reference
10-15% of the
text), or the author
10-15% of the
text), or the author
literature review,
follows Turabian
list. A couple of the
listed references
fails to incorporate
references and/or
fails to incorporate
references and/or
style perfectly,
incorporates
smooth transitions.
are not used in the
review,
follows Turabian
style consistently
with few errors,
uses quotations
and citations
appropriately,
transitions are clear
but may not be
smooth.
citations
appropriately/effec
tively, generally
lacks transitions.
citations
appropriately/effec
tively, generally
lacks transitions.
Total
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=162556&db=407700
/ 100
5/6
3/12/24, 8:44 AM
Assignment 2: Literature Review – INTL621 I001 Winter 2024 – APEI
Overall Score
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
90 points minimum
80 points minimum
70 points minimum
60 points minimum
0 points minimum
https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?ou=162556&db=407700
6/6
Purchase answer to see full
attachment