Description
I’m attaching the rubric
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed_ JAN21
Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed_ JAN21
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeInitial Post
Content
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeInitial Post
Evidence & Sources
Ratings
Pts
7 pts
5 pts
3 pts
0 pts
Outstanding
Very Good
Competent
Poor
Addresses ALL
aspects of the
initial
discussion
question(s),
applying
experiences,
knowledge,
and
understanding
regarding ALL
weekly
concepts.
Addresses
MOST aspects
of the initial
discussion
question(s),
applying
experiences,
knowledge,
and
understanding
of MOST of
the weekly
concepts.
Address SOME
aspects of the
initial
discussion
question(s),
applying
experiences,
knowledge,
and
understanding
of SOME of
the weekly
concepts.
Minimally
address the
initial
discussion
question(s)
or does not
address the
initial
question(s).
4 pts
3 pts
2 pts
0 pts
Outstanding
Very Good
Competent
Poor
Integrates
evidence to
support
discussion from
assigned
readings OR
online lessons,
AND at least one
outside scholarly
source. Sources
are credited.
Integrates
evidence to
support
discussion
from
assigned
readings OR
online
lessons.
Sources are
credited.
Integrates
evidence to
support
discussion only
from an
outside source
with no
mention of
assigned
reading or
lesson. Sources
are credited.
Does not
integrate
any
evidence.
7 pts
4 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed_ JAN21
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeFollow-up
Post
8 pts
6 pts
4 pts
0 pts
Outstanding
Very Good
Competent
Poor
Response
furthers the
dialogue by
providing more
information and
clarification,
thereby adding
much depth to
the discussion.
Response
furthers the
dialogue by
adding
some depth
to the
discussion
Response does
not further the
dialogue
significantly;
add little depth
to the
discussion.
Does not
respond to
another
student or
instructor.
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeProfessional
Communication
Pts
4 pts
3 pts
2 pts
0 pts
Outstanding
Very Good
Competent
Poor
Presents
information
using clear
and concise
language in
an organized
manner
(minimal
errors in
English
grammar,
spelling,
syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents
information
in an
organized
manner (few
errors in
English
grammar,
spelling,
syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents
information
using
understandable
language but is
somewhat
disorganized
(some errors in
English
grammar,
spelling,
syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents
information
that is not
clear, logical,
professional
or organized
to the point
that the
reader has
difficulty
understanding
the message
(numerous
errors in
English
grammar,
spelling,
syntax, and/or
punctuation).
8 pts
4 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed_ JAN21
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeFrequency
of Responses
2 pts
0 pts
Outstanding
Poor
Posts in the discussion on
two different days.
Posts fewer than two different days
OR does not participate at all.
Total Points: 25
Pts
2 pts
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
•
•
•
Textbook: Chapter 1
Lesson
Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address the following:
What is the value of studying the humanities in the field of health professions?
How might a topic such as art, literature, music, dance, etc. from other time
periods enhance your career and personal life in the present?
• Select one aspect of the humanities that is meaningful to your personal life and
one for career. Explain how is each meaningful.
• In addition, include a specific example of a work (a specific work of art, literature,
theater, or music) that you feel is meaningful to your personal life and/or career.
Explain the connection.
•
•
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and
clarification.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
