HSA545 WEEK 10

Description

Week 10 Assignment – Human Resources and Staffing Crisis at Blumberg’s Nursing Home

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
HSA545 WEEK 10
From as Little as $13/Page

Due: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:00amDue: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:00am

Ungraded, 220 Possible Points220 Points Possible

Attempt

In Progress

NEXT UP: Submit Assignment

Add Comment

3 Attempts Allowed

Available after Feb 19, 2024 12:00amAvailable after Feb 19, 2024 12:00am

Details

Overview

Blumberg’s Nursing Home (BNH) is a 100-bed Medicare and Medicaid-certified facility in suburban Philadelphia, PA. The administrator recently terminated the facility’s DON, receptionist, and dietary aid for inappropriate conduct. They had all been involved in purchasing and using illegal substances on facility grounds. The facility staff and many of the more lucid residents have found out about the incident.

The charge nurse has been appointed interim DON. The human resource manager has sent a memo to all staff informing them of a mandatory staff meeting to discuss BNH’s code of ethics and to provide additional training on workplace culture. Because federal law requires that there be at least one registered nurse on duty for a minimum of eight hours a day, seven days a week and that the DON must be a registered nurse (RN), which the interim DON is not – BNH is out of compliance.

Instructions

Create a 10-12 slide audio-visual PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes (minimum of 10 minutes recording) in which you:

Assess the immediate staffing needs at BNH. Prioritize the order in which BNH should fill the main unstaffed position. Justify your selection.
Considering the reason behind the termination of the employees, formulate a human resources policy that addresses inappropriate conduct in the workplace, the process of reporting inappropriate conduct, and the consequences of violating the policy. Explain your rationale.
Per the text, an effective long-term care facility administrator must have both leadership and management skills. Propose at least one way the administrator in this case must demonstrate quality leadership skills and one way the administrator must demonstrate quality management skills in the aftermath of this crisis so as to improve and maintain staff and resident morale.
Recommend a strategy for BNH to use the Quality Indicator Survey to improve administrative practices and ensure future compliance at the facility. Justify your recommendation.
Summarize in one slide your key findings, providing real-world examples as applicable.
Narrate each slide, using Kaltura, as if you were presenting in front of the audience. The narration provided must be a minimum of 10 minutes.
Use five sources to support your writing. Sources should be recent and published within the last five years. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Assignment Requirements

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Format the PowerPoint presentation with headings on each slide with relevant graphics (photographs, graphs, clip art, etc.) to ensure the presentation is visually appealing and readable from 18 feet away. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a title slide containing the assignment title, your name, the professor’s full name, the course title, and the date. The title and reference slides are not included in the required number of slides.
Make use of your speaker notes to clarify and elaborate on the information contained in your slides.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

Formulate a human resource policy that addresses inappropriate conduct in the workplace, administration leadership skills, and strategies for improving administrative practices.

View Rubric

Week 10 Assignment – Human Resources and Staffing Crisis at Blumberg’s Nursing Home

Week 10 Assignment – Human Resources and Staffing Crisis at Blumberg’s Nursing Home
Criteria Ratings Pts
Assess the immediate staffing needs at BNH, prioritizing the order in which BNH should fill the main unstaffed position. Justify your selection.

view longer description

30.8 to >27.71 pts

Exemplary

Assessed the immediate staffing needs at BNH, prioritizing the order in which BNH should fill the main unstaffed position. Justified your selections.

27.71 to >24.63 pts

Competent

Provided a list of immediate staffing needs at BNH but provided no assessment. Prioritized the order in which BNH should fill the unstaffed positions but did not justify selections.

24.63 to >21.55 pts

Needs Improvement

Provided a list of immediate staffing needs at BNH but did not prioritize the order in which BNH should fill the main unstaffed positions. Did not justify selection.

21.55 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not provide a list of immediate staffing needs of BNH. Did not prioritize the order in which BNH should fill the main unstaffed position. Did not justify selection.

/ 30.8 pts

Formulate a human resources policy that addresses inappropriate conduct in the workplace, the process of reporting inappropriate conduct, and the consequences of violating the policy. Explain your rationale.

view longer description

30.8 to >27.71 pts

Exemplary

Formulated a human resources policy that addresses inappropriate conduct in the workplace, the process of reporting inappropriate conduct, and the consequences of violating the policy. Explained your rationale.

27.71 to >24.63 pts

Competent

Formulated a human resources policy that only addresses two of the following: inappropriate conduct in the workplace, the process of reporting inappropriate conduct, and the consequences of violating the policy. Explained your rationale.

24.63 to >21.55 pts

Needs Improvement

Formulated a human resources policy that only addresses one of the following: inappropriate conduct in the workplace, the process of reporting inappropriate conduct, or the consequences of violating the policy. Did not explain your rationale.

21.55 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not formulate a Human resources policy that addresses inappropriate conduct in the workplace, the process of reporting inappropriate conduct, and the consequences of violating the policy. Did not explain your rationale.

/ 30.8 pts

Propose at least one way the administrator in this case must demonstrate quality leadership skills, and one way the administrator must demonstrate quality management skills.

view longer description

28.6 to >25.73 pts

Exemplary

Proposed at least one way the administrator must demonstrate quality leadership skills and quality management skills, providing justification for the proposal.

25.73 to >22.87 pts

Competent

Proposed at least one way the administrator must demonstrate quality leadership skills and quality management skills but did not provide justification.

22.87 to >20.01 pts

Needs Improvement

Stated at least one way the administrator must demonstrate quality leadership skills but did not state quality management skills.

20.01 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not state at least one way the administrator must demonstrate quality leadership skills and quality management skills.

/ 28.6 pts

Recommend a strategy for BNH to use the Quality Indicator Survey to improve administrative practices and ensure future compliance at the facility. Justify your recommendation.

view longer description

28.6 to >25.73 pts

Exemplary

Recommended a strategy for BNH to use the Quality Indicator Survey and ensure future compliance at the facility. Justified your recommendation, providing an example of the outcome.

25.73 to >22.87 pts

Competent

Recommend a strategy for BNH to use the Quality Indicator Survey and ensure future compliance at the facility. Justified your recommendation but did not provide an example of the outcome.

22.87 to >20.01 pts

Needs Improvement

Recommended a strategy for BNH to use the Quality Indicator Survey and ensure future compliance at the facility but did not provide a justification.

20.01 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not submit or incompletely recommended a strategy for BNH to use the Quality Indicator Survey and ensure future compliance at the facility. Did not submit or incompletely justified the recommendation.

/ 28.6 pts

Summarize key findings on one slide, providing real-world examples as applicable.

view longer description

28.6 to >25.73 pts

Exemplary

Summarized key findings on one slide, providing real-world examples as applicable.

25.73 to >22.87 pts

Competent

Summarized key findings on one slide but provided no examples.

22.87 to >20.01 pts

Needs Improvement

Listed key findings on one slide but provided no summary.

20.01 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not list key findings on one slide.

/ 28.6 pts

Narrate each slide, using Kaltura, as if presenting in front of the audience. Narration provided is a minimum of 10 minutes.

view longer description

28.6 to >25.73 pts

Exemplary

Narrated each slide using Kaltura, as if presenting in front of the audience. Narration provided was a minimum of 10 minutes.

25.73 to >22.87 pts

Competent

Narrated each slide, using Kaltura, as if presenting in front of the audience. Narration provided was less than 10 minutes.

22.87 to >20.01 pts

Needs Improvement

Narrated some, but not all slides, using Kaltura.

20.01 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not narrate any slides.

/ 28.6 pts

Provide five quality academic references.

view longer description

22 to >19.79 pts

Exemplary

Met the required number of references, all references are peer reviewed, academic references.

19.79 to >17.59 pts

Competent

Met the required number of references; some or all references are not peer reviewed, academic references.

17.59 to >15.39 pts

Needs Improvement

Did not meet the required number of references; some or all references are not peer reviewed, academic references.

15.39 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

No references provided.

/ 22 pts

Provide writing that meets clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.

view longer description

22 to >19.79 pts

Exemplary

Writing has very few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 0-2 errors.

19.79 to >17.59 pts

Competent

Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in a few places; few fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. 3-4 errors.

17.59 to >15.39 pts

Needs Improvement

Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors that are distracting in some places. 5-6 errors present.

15.39 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Writing has spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, fragments, comma splices and run-ons that distract from the message. More than 6 errors

/ 22 pts

Total Points: 0

Choose a submission type

Select submission type TextText

Select submission type UploadUpload

I agree to the tool’s End-User License AgreementThis assignment submission is my own, original work

PreviousWeek 10 Discussion – Continuous Quality ImprovementSubmit AssignmentNextNext Module: Week