Help with understanding airports

Description

First Assignment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Assignment on
Help with understanding airports
From as Little as $13/Page

Use the textbook along with external resources to compile your answers.

Consider each answer as a mini-paper, including quotations and citings from resources. Include links to any articles, books, and reference information.

Upload as a Word Document.

Discussion Questions:

Explain the terms in Chapter 1: enplanements, deplanements, and transfer passengers by providing an example of each.
Discuss the NPIAS two major airport categories and give an example of each subcategory.
Why do we design airports for some capacity less than the highest capacity we can ever expect?
Which would be the most effective of the techniques discussed in the readings for lessening delay problems? Why?

After answering the questions, please Pick a general aviation airport and a hub airport of your choice and download the airport manager’s organizational charts for both airports. Post the organizational charts together below the questions

Word count in total 750 words

Requesting for a quick response to this assignment by Wednesday this week!!

Assignment 2

prepare a case study of an airport issue or event relevant to the week’s assigned readings each week. Elements of the case study will include a summary of the issue or event, resources relevant to the event or issue found through internet research, the conclusions of the article, and a discussion of the student’s assessment of impacts on the aviation industry, if any, as a result of the issue or event. These case studies are scholarly works, must show the applicability of the identified issue or event to the week’s assigned readings, and will be written in the current APA style with a of 5 pages APA format double spaced). The case studies must show the student’s thorough understanding of the subject and be written in a scholarly manner following grammatical and style formats.

Please follow rule brick below

Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Critical Thinking

view longer description

25 pts

The case study promotes sophisticated use of module content. The submission demonstrate the students’ mastery of module content knowledge. This is evidenced by extensive use of concepts and terminology incorporated in the content along with the corresponding research. Examples depict understanding of concepts and are clear and accurate.

23 pts

The case study promotes proficient use of module content. The submission demonstrate the students’ understanding of module content knowledge. This is evidenced by the use of concepts and terminology incorporated in the content along with the corresponding research. Examples depict understanding of concepts and are clear and accurate.

20 pts

The case study promotes adequate use of module content. The submission demonstrate the students’ understanding of module content knowledge. This is evidenced by the use of some of the concepts and terminology incorporated in the content along with the corresponding research. Examples depict an adequate understanding of concepts and are clear and accurate.

15 pts

The case study promotes a basic use of module content. The submission demonstrate the students’ understanding of the module content with basic knowledge. This is evidenced by the use of one or two of the concepts and terminology incorporated in the content along with the corresponding research. Examples depict a basic understanding of concepts and are clear and accurate.

10 pts

The case study does not demonstrate the use of module content. Further is evidenced by the content not including the topics and terminology from the module.

0 pts

• no analysis or insight is displayed

/ 25 pts

Connections

view longer description

15 pts

The case study’s content connects to the module assigned reading and content by addressing components, and linking to module material or topics learned.

12 pts

The case study’s content mostly connects to the module assigned reading and content by making some connections.

10 pts

The case study connections are made to the module content but not really clear or too obvious.

7 pts

The case study connections are limited, if any connections, vague generalities.

5 pts

The case study connections are made, but off topic.

0 pts

• no connections are made • off topic

/ 15 pts

Uniqueness

view longer description

10 pts

• new ideas • new connections • made with depth and detail

8 pts

• new ideas or connections • lack depth and/or detail

7 pts

• few, if any new ideas or connections • rehash or summarize other postings

6 pts

• some new ideas • “I agree with …” statement

0 pts

• no new ideas

/ 10 pts

Stylistics

view longer description

15 pts

• few grammatical or stylistic errors

12 pts

• several grammatical or stylistic errors

10 pts

• obvious grammatical or stylistic errors • errors interfere with content

7 pts

• obvious grammatical or stylistic errors

0 pts

• understanding impossible due to poor writing

/ 15 pts

APA and Sources

view longer description

15 pts

Locates outside sources and the primary sources, valid references and cites properly

12 pts

• Has sources and cites properly with valid references.

10 pts

• Attempts to include some valid sources or citations.

7 pts

• Has sources but does not cite properly, includes valid references.

0 pts

Missing citations and/or including references that are not able to locate reference (s).

/ 15 pts

Paper Requirements

view longer description

20 pts

Page requirements met or exceeded, is in APA format, includes page numbers, includes APA headings, and is organized.

17 pts

Paper requirements are mostly met such as page requirements met, is in APA format, includes page numbers, includes APA headings, and is organized.

14 pts

Paper requirements are somewhat met such as page requirements just shy of the required length, is in APA format, might include page numbers and/or APA headings, and is somewhat organized.

10 pts

Paper requirements are not all met such as page requirements do not meet the required length, is in APA format, might include page numbers and/or APA headings, and is somewhat organized.

5 pts

Paper requirements are not met such as page requirements do not meet the required length, not in APA format, might include page numbers and/or APA headings, and is somewhat organized.

/ 20 pts


Unformatted Attachment Preview

Purchase answer to see full
attachment