Description
Use the attached document to complete this assignment.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Collapse All
Health Policy Formulation and Analysis – Rubric
Completion of Health Care Policy Template
119 points
Criteria Description
Completion of Health Care Policy Template
5. Excellent
119 points
Submission incorporates all seven required elements comprehensively throughout
the template. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence
insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is
appropriate.
4. Good
101.15 points
Submission incorporates all seven required elements in full within the template.
The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
3. Satisfactory
89.25 points
Submission incorporates all seven required elements but minimal detail is present
or minimal support is provided for one or more components within the template.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
77.35 points
Submission incorporates some but not all seven required elements from the
template. The information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise
deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Not included.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Thesis Development and Purpose
11.9 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
11.9 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
10.12 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and
reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
8.93 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
7.74 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Argument Logic and Construction
13.6 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
13.6 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and
compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
11.56 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
10.2 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents
minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the
purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
8.84 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not
support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use)
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
8.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
7.23 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
6.38 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.53 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
8.5 points
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
8.5 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
7.23 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
6.38 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors
may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.53 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of
control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed
correctly.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
8.5 points
Documentation of Sources
8.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
8.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
7.23 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
6.38 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
5.53 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 170 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
