Description
The purpose of this assignment is to identify an area or topic within health care that you would like to further understand.
In this assignment, you will begin to create a research rough draft based on the information you prepared in the “Identification of a Research Topic” from the topic 1 assignment. Utilize the GCU library and locate three additional articles that will complement and support your specific topic of interest. In a 1,500- to 2,000-word research rough draft, utilizing the research process (refer to your text, Understanding Research), include the following:
An introduction to the topic.
An explanation of how the articles are used in scholarly research within health care as it relates to the allied health care profession.
A discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection.
An explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis, including quantitative and qualitative. Include a discussion of the conclusions that can be made from the data and how it would be applied to the health care setting.
An evaluation, based on the research, of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness on the topic as it relates to the allied health care professional.
A summary of the conclusions from the articles.
Support your rough draft with at least 3 scholarly resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA 7th guidelines
* The draft and “Identification of a Research Topic” are attached
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1
Identification of Research Topic
Identification of Research Topic
Introduction
In the realm of healthcare, precision and accuracy are paramount to ensure the well-being
of patients. One often-overlooked yet crucial aspect of this precision is the proper labeling of
specimens collected for diagnostic purposes. The failure to label specimens accurately can have
far-reaching consequences, affecting diagnoses, treatment plans, and overall patient safety. This
2
research delves into the implications of specimen mislabeling within healthcare settings,
exploring the potential risks, challenges, and the imperative need for stringent protocols.
Selected Topic
The selection of the topic, failure to label specimens in healthcare settings, stems from a
recognition of its profound implications on patient care and safety. In the intricate web of
healthcare procedures, accurate and reliable diagnostic information is the cornerstone of effective
treatment. The failure to label specimens correctly introduces a precarious element into this
process, potentially leading to misdiagnosis, treatment errors, and compromised patient safety.
The decision to delve into this issue is motivated by a commitment to understanding the
intricacies of specimen labeling, exploring the risks associated with missteps, and advocating for
the strict adherence to established protocols. By shining a spotlight on this aspect of healthcare
practices, the research aims to contribute to the enhancement of clinical accuracy and patient
outcomes, emphasizing the critical role that proper specimen labeling plays in maintaining the
highest standards of care within healthcare institutions.
Content of the Articles
Three articles were selected for this research topic, discussing the impact of mislabeling
specimens. First article selected, “Specimen Labelling Errors Just Don’t Cut It in the Operating
Room” discusses the impact of specimen labeling errors in the context of operating rooms.
Shedding light on how labeling issues with specimens pose a patient safety concern that is
avoidable and has the potential to cause significant harm to patients. For instance, delayed or
incorrect therapy or the failure to recognize malignancies (Lee, 2016). The second article, titled
“The Effect of Barcode Technology Use on Pathology Specimen Labeling Error” focused on the
role of barcode technology in mitigating specimen labeling errors, particularly in the field of
3
pathology. The research indicated that employing barcode technology can reduce the occurrence
of specimen labeling errors. This technology is applicable to various healthcare professionals,
including surgeons, laboratory department staff, nurses, and nursing assistants, involved in
specimen management (Yu et al., 2019). Lastly, the third article “Reducing Errors in Radiology
Specimen Labeling Through Use of a Two-person Check” highlighted the significant harm that
can be inflicted on patients due to incorrect labeling of biopsy samples, leading to delays in
diagnosis, administration of inappropriate treatments, and a potential erosion of trust in the
healthcare system. The study demonstrated that incorporating a two-person verification process
before submitting specimens to pathology can effectively eliminate such errors (Schwartz et al.,
2020). The articles selected provide valuable insights into the topic of specimen labeling errors in
healthcare settings.
Research Process Used
The research process within evidence-based practice is a systematic and iterative
approach aimed at improving patient care by addressing identified problems or issues. It begins
with a clear definition of the problem, followed by the formulation of specific research questions.
A comprehensive literature review is conducted to identify existing evidence and best practices,
guiding the subsequent design and implementation of research studies. Rigorous data analysis
and interpretation lead to actionable findings that can be translated into practice. Changes to
clinical procedures are implemented based on the evidence, and ongoing evaluation ensures the
effectiveness of these interventions. Researchers then disseminate their findings through
publications and presentations, contributing valuable knowledge to the healthcare community.
This cyclical process fosters continuous improvement in evidence-based practice, ultimately
enhancing the quality of patient care.
4
Explanation of the Significance
The evidence-based research on the topic of specimen labeling errors in allied healthcare
settings, as discussed in the articles “Specimen Labelling Errors Just Don’t Cut It in the
Operating Room,” “The Effect of Barcode Technology Use on Pathology Specimen Labeling
Errors,” and “Reducing Errors in Radiology Specimen Labeling Through Use of a Two-person
Check,” holds significant implications for the standards of allied healthcare. Firstly,
understanding and addressing specimen labeling errors contribute to the overarching goal of
patient safety within allied healthcare. Accurate specimen identification is foundational to proper
diagnoses and treatment plans, aligning with the core principles of providing high-quality care.
The research findings also have practical implications for the development and enhancement of
standardized protocols and procedures in allied healthcare practices. The identification of
effective interventions, such as the use of barcode technology or the implementation of a twoperson check system, underscores the importance of adopting technological advancements and
collaborative strategies to minimize errors in specimen labeling. Moreover, the evidence-based
insights derived from these studies contribute to the ongoing refinement of allied healthcare
standards and guidelines. By acknowledging the challenges and potential solutions related to
specimen labeling, healthcare practitioners can integrate best practices into their daily routines,
ensuring adherence to the highest standards of accuracy and patient care.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the evidence-based research on specimen labeling errors in allied
healthcare not only enhances patient safety but also serves as a catalyst for continuous
improvement in standards and practices. The integration of technology and collaborative
5
approaches highlighted in the research aligns with the evolving landscape of allied healthcare,
emphasizing the importance of evidence-based strategies in maintaining and elevating the quality
of care provided to patients.
References
Lee, T. (2016). Specimen Labelling Errors Just Don’t Cut It in the Operating Room. ORNAC
Journal, 34(3), 14–37.
Schwartz, M., Osborn, H., Palmieri, J., Patel, B., & Flug, J. A. (2020). Reducing Errors in
Radiology Specimen Labeling Through Use of a Two-person Check. Current Problems in
6
Diagnostic Radiology, 49(5), 351–354. https://doiorg.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.003
Yu, M.-H., Lee, T.-T., & Mills, M. E. (2019). The Effect of Barcode Technology Use on
Pathology Specimen Labeling Errors. AORN Journal, 109(2), 183–191. https://doiorg.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/aorn.12585
Health Care Field Research Draft – Rubric
Total 200 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Introduction
0 points
6.5 points
7.5 points
8.5 points
10 points
Introduction
The introduction to the topic
is not included.
The introduction to the topic
is not complete.
The introduction to the topic
is included but lacks
description and relevant
supporting details.
The introduction to the topic
is complete and includes
relevant supporting details.
The introduction to the topic
is thorough and includes
substantial relevant
supporting details.
Explanation of Scholarly
Research
0 points
19.5 points
22.5 points
25.5 points
30 points
Explanation of how the
articles are used in scholarly
research within health care
as it relates to the allied
health care profession
The explanation of how the
articles are used in scholarly
research within health care
as it relates to the allied
health care profession is not
included.
The explanation of how the
articles are used in scholarly
research within health care
as it relates to the allied
health care profession is not
complete.
The explanation of how the
articles are used in scholarly
research within health care
as it relates to the allied
health care profession is
included, but lacks
description and relevant
supporting details.
The explanation of how the
articles are used in scholarly
research within health care
as it relates to the allied
health care profession is
complete, and includes
relevant supporting details.
The explanation of how the
articles are used in scholarly
research within health care
as it relates to the allied
health care profession is
thorough, and includes
substantial relevant
supporting details.
Ethical Considerations
0 points
13 points
15 points
17 points
20 points
Discussion of the ethical
considerations for data
collection
The discussion of the ethical
considerations for data
collection is not included.
The discussion of the ethical
considerations for data
collection is not complete.
The discussion of the ethical
considerations for data
collection is included, but
lacks description and
relevant supporting details.
The discussion of the ethical
considerations for data
collection is complete, and
includes relevant supporting
details.
The discussion of the ethical
considerations for data
collection is thorough, and
includes substantial relevant
supporting details.
Data Explanation
0 points
19.5 points
22.5 points
25.5 points
30 points
Explanation of what the data
reveals in terms of statistical
analysis, including
quantitative and qualitative,
and a discussion of the
conclusions that can be
made from the data and how
it would be applied to the
health care setting
The explanation of what the
data reveals in terms of
statistical analysis, including
quantitative and qualitative,
and a discussion of the
conclusions that can be
made from the data and how
it would be applied to the
health care setting is not
included.
The explanation of what the
data reveals in terms of
statistical analysis, including
quantitative and qualitative,
and a discussion of the
conclusions that can be
made from the data and how
it would be applied to the
health care setting is not
complete.
The explanation of what the
data reveals in terms of
statistical analysis, including
quantitative and qualitative,
and a discussion of the
conclusions that can be
made from the data and how
it would be applied to the
health care setting is
included, but lacks
description and relevant
supporting details.
The explanation of what the
data reveals in terms of
statistical analysis, including
quantitative and qualitative,
and a discussion of the
conclusions that can be
made from the data and how
it would be applied to the
health care setting is
complete, and includes
relevant supporting details.
The explanation of what the
data reveals in terms of
statistical analysis, including
quantitative and qualitative,
and a discussion of the
conclusions that can be
made from the data and how
it would be applied to the
health care setting is
thorough, and includes
substantial relevant
supporting details.
Evaluation of Topic
0 points
19.5 points
22.5 points
25.5 points
30 points
Evaluation of whether there
is enough information to
make a decision on the
effectiveness of the topic of
interest based on the
research, as it relates to the
allied health care
professional
The evaluation of whether
there is enough information
to make a decision on the
effectiveness of the topic of
interest based on the
research, as it relates to the
allied health care
professional is not included.
The evaluation of whether
there is enough information
to make a decision on the
effectiveness of the topic of
interest based on the
research, as it relates to the
allied health care
professional is not complete.
The evaluation of whether
there is enough information
to make a decision on the
effectiveness of the topic of
interest based on the
research, as it relates to the
allied health care
professional is included, but
lacks description and
relevant supporting details.
The evaluation of whether
there is enough information
to make a decision on the
effectiveness of the topic of
interest based on the
research, as it relates to the
allied health care
professional is complete, and
includes relevant supporting
details.
The evaluation of whether
there is enough information
to make a decision on the
effectiveness of the topic of
interest based on the
research, as it relates to the
allied health care
professional is thorough, and
includes substantial relevant
supporting details.
Article Summaries
0 points
13 points
15 points
17 points
20 points
Summary of the conclusions
from the articles
The summary of the
conclusions from the articles
is not included.
The summary of the
conclusions from the articles
is not complete.
The summary of the
conclusions from the articles
is included, but lacks
description and relevant
supporting details.
The summary of the
conclusions from the articles
is complete, and includes
relevant supporting details.
The summary of the
conclusions from the articles
is thorough, and includes
substantial relevant
supporting details.
Thesis Development and
Purpose
0 points
9.1 points
10.5 points
11.9 points
14 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not discernible.
No awareness of the
appropriate audience is
evident.
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very little
awareness of the intended
audience.
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An awareness of
the appropriate audience is
demonstrated.
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable in
most aspects but is
occasionally weak or unclear.
There is limited awareness of
the appropriate
© 2024. Grand Canyon University.
All Rights audience.
Reserved.
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
0 points
9.1 points
10.5 points
11.9 points
14 points
Advances position or
purpose throughout writing;
conclusion aligns to and
evolves from development.
No advancement of the
thesis, position, or purpose is
evident. Connections
between paragraphs are
missing or inappropriate. No
conclusion is offered.
Writing lacks logical
progression of the thesis,
position, or purpose. Some
organization is attempted,
but ideas are disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear and not
supported by the overall
development of the purpose.
Limited advancement of
thesis, position, or purpose is
discernable. There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic and
not fully aligned to the
development of the purpose.
The thesis, position, or
purpose is advanced in most
aspects. Ideas clearly build
on each other. Conclusion
aligns to the development of
the purpose.
The thesis, position, or
purpose is logically advanced
throughout. The progression
of ideas is coherent and
unified. A clear and logical
conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.
Evidence
0 points
7.8 points
9 points
10.2 points
12 points
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other perspectives.
Evidence to support the
thesis, position, or purpose is
absent. The writing relies
entirely on the perspective of
the writer.
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The interpretation
of other perspectives is
superficial or incorrect.
Evidence is used but is
Relevant evidence that
insufficient or of limited
includes other perspectives
relevance. Simplistic
is used.
explanation or integration of
other perspectives is present.
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.
Mechanics of Writing
0 points
7.8 points
9 points
10.2 points
12 points
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
Errors in grammar or syntax
are pervasive and impede
meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure
errors are found throughout.
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or sentence
structure are recurrent.
Occasional mechanical errors
are present. Language choice
is generally appropriate.
Varied sentence structure is
attempted.
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are used
throughout.
Format/Documentation
0 points
5.2 points
6 points
6.8 points
8 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of sources
are evident.
Appropriate format and
documentation are used,
although there are some
obvious errors.
Appropriate format and
Appropriate format and
documentation are used with documentation are used with
only minor errors.
only minor errors. No errors
in formatting or
documentation are present.
Uses appropriate style, such Appropriate format is not
as APA, MLA, etc., for college, used. No documentation of
subject, and level;
sources is provided.
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment
and discipline.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
