Description
write 600 words about the guest lecture slides that will be attached below. The recruit is also attached below with the ESEM principles. Please don’t use ballot points
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Summary of ESEM Principles
Principle Class
Theoretical
Principles
(TP)
Governance
Principles
(GP)
Principle Principle Name
Number
TP1
Intervention
TP2
Cultural, ethical, and religious dimensions
TP3
Evaluate before and not after the
technological shift
TP4
Separating technological engineering from
social engineering
TP5
Reflect real world couplings and linkages
through time, rather than disciplinary or
ideological simplicity
GP1
Transparent Governance
GP2
Multicultural Dialogue
GP3
Embrace uncertainty and unpredictability
Principle Summary
Intervening in complex systems has the risk of unintended
negative consequences and should only be reserved for cases
when intervention is both necessary and feasible.
Engineering in complex earth systems inherently is tied into
multiple dimensions of the human experience and involves
deep connection with cultural, ethical, and religious traditions
that must be understood how these connections shape
engineering intervention, often subtly, and how the
intervention will be viewed.
Interventions in earth systems have risks and linkages that
must be evaluated before interventions are begun at scale or
encouraged
Technical engineering and social engineering are different and
this difference must be understood, respected and not
intentionally conflated.
Earth systems engineering and management handles
problems in the real world, and traditional field boundaries do
not constrain complex problems, or the options to manage
them.
ESEM initiatives by definition raise important scientific,
technical, economic, political, ethical, theological, and cultural
issues in the context of an increasingly complex global polity.
Given the need for consensus and long-term commitment,
the only workable governance model is one which is
democratic, transparent, and accountable
Interventions must have a dialog between all stakeholders in
the project for public acceptance of the intervention.
Complex adaptive systems are defined by difficult to predict
nonlinear responses, and interventions must plan for the
Principle Class
Principle Principle Name
Number
Principle Summary
allowable response.
Design and
Management
Principles
(DMP)
GP4
Continuous learning
GP5
Long-term Investment
DMP1
Establish metrics
DMP2
Part of the system
DMP3
Incremental and reversible
DMP4
Flexibility and the ability to evolve
Interventions must have a systematic process in place to
evaluate and learn from system responses.
The intervention, and the necessary continuing research to
ensure the system is behaving similar to expected must be
properly resourced.
Quantifiable metrics must be developed and tracked during
the course of the intervention to ensure the intervention is
improving the situation and not having unexpected adverse
effects
Engineers are never external to the systems they design
especially in the case of earth systems, and must understand
how their biases and mental models are effecting how they
understand and design.
Interventions should not be fundamental and irreversible and
prevent premature lock in.
Systems should be able to evolve with changes in the system
and in response to reflexive changes due to the intervention.
Summary of ESEM Principles
Principle Class
Theoretical
Principles
(TP)
Governance
Principles
(GP)
Principle Principle Name
Number
TP1
Intervention
TP2
Cultural, ethical, and religious dimensions
TP3
Evaluate before and not after the
technological shift
TP4
Separating technological engineering from
social engineering
TP5
Reflect real world couplings and linkages
through time, rather than disciplinary or
ideological simplicity
GP1
Transparent Governance
GP2
Multicultural Dialogue
GP3
Embrace uncertainty and unpredictability
Principle Summary
Intervening in complex systems has the risk of unintended
negative consequences and should only be reserved for cases
when intervention is both necessary and feasible.
Engineering in complex earth systems inherently is tied into
multiple dimensions of the human experience and involves
deep connection with cultural, ethical, and religious traditions
that must be understood how these connections shape
engineering intervention, often subtly, and how the
intervention will be viewed.
Interventions in earth systems have risks and linkages that
must be evaluated before interventions are begun at scale or
encouraged
Technical engineering and social engineering are different and
this difference must be understood, respected and not
intentionally conflated.
Earth systems engineering and management handles
problems in the real world, and traditional field boundaries do
not constrain complex problems, or the options to manage
them.
ESEM initiatives by definition raise important scientific,
technical, economic, political, ethical, theological, and cultural
issues in the context of an increasingly complex global polity.
Given the need for consensus and long-term commitment,
the only workable governance model is one which is
democratic, transparent, and accountable
Interventions must have a dialog between all stakeholders in
the project for public acceptance of the intervention.
Complex adaptive systems are defined by difficult to predict
nonlinear responses, and interventions must plan for the
Principle Class
Principle Principle Name
Number
Principle Summary
allowable response.
Design and
Management
Principles
(DMP)
GP4
Continuous learning
GP5
Long-term Investment
DMP1
Establish metrics
DMP2
Part of the system
DMP3
Incremental and reversible
DMP4
Flexibility and the ability to evolve
Interventions must have a systematic process in place to
evaluate and learn from system responses.
The intervention, and the necessary continuing research to
ensure the system is behaving similar to expected must be
properly resourced.
Quantifiable metrics must be developed and tracked during
the course of the intervention to ensure the intervention is
improving the situation and not having unexpected adverse
effects
Engineers are never external to the systems they design
especially in the case of earth systems, and must understand
how their biases and mental models are effecting how they
understand and design.
Interventions should not be fundamental and irreversible and
prevent premature lock in.
Systems should be able to evolve with changes in the system
and in response to reflexive changes due to the intervention.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
