Description
Hello, I uploaded my pervasive assignment to help you with this assignment.
This assignment will determine the largest percentage of your grade and build upon the Question to Position paper. In theory you are creating this guide for someone who will have the same question in the future. In essence you are gifting them a head start on the process. For this assignment you will:
Introduce your topic and state your research question. You’ve been working on this throughout the course and may need to slightly tweak earlier iterations of it based on instruction feedback. Identify your audience. Is this for a general audience? Or experts in the field? Or people with some established knowledge on the topic already? This part should be a single paragraph.
Identify 4 sources that help frame and shape your understanding of the topic and address how you plan to answer the research question. State what category (background, exhibit, argument, or method) each source matches. Refer back to the BEAM framework Links to an external site. if you are uncertain. Cite your sources according to APA or a style of your choosing.
1 Background source
1 Exhibit source
1 Argument source
1 Method source
Write a brief description for each of the four sources. In the description include:
A summary of the article, resource or webpage;
A summary of the source (journal, newspaper or website) and why it is reputable for this topic.
Evaluate the source paying particular attention to the qualities below. Refer back to Ch 6: Evaluating SourcesLinks to an external site. for more. This section is the most important.
RelevancyLinks to an external site.
CredibilityLinks to an external site.
Degree of biasLinks to an external site.
Note that you not doing any writing to reach a conclusion about your question; the emphasis here is on forming your question and identifying and evaluating sources that you could use to address it in a full research project.
See a brief example Download brief examplefor a single source.
Final Research Guide
Final Research Guide
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch question / Explanation of issue
20 ptsExceeds expectationsIssue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. 17 ptsMeets expectationsIssue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. 14 ptsNeeds improvementIssue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown. 10 ptsBelow expectationsIssue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource quality / Evidence
20 ptsExceeds expectationsInformation is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly. 17 ptsMeets expectationsIssue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. 14 ptsNeeds improvementInformation is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. 10 ptsBelow expectationsInformation is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource evaluation
20 ptsExceeds expectationsThoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. 17 ptsMeets expectationsIdentifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. 14 ptsNeeds improvementQuestions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa). 10 ptsBelow expectationsShows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffective use of information
20 ptsExceeds expectationsCommunicates, organizes and synthesizes information from sources to fully achieve a specific purpose, with clarity and depth. 17 ptsMeets expectationsCommunicates, organizes and synthesizes information from sources. Intended purpose is achieved. 14 ptsNeeds improvementCommunicates and organizes information from sources. The information is not yet synthesized, so the intended purpose is not fully achieved. 10 ptsBelow expectationsCommunicates information from sources. The information is fragmented and/or used inappropriately (misquoted, taken out of context, or incorrectly paraphrased, etc.), so the intended purpose is not achieved.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical use of information
20 ptsExceeds expectationsStudents use correctly all of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution). 17 ptsMeets expectationsStudents use correctly three of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution). 14 ptsNeeds improvementStudents use correctly two of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution). 10 ptsBelow expectationsStudents use correctly one of the following information use strategies (use of citations and references; choice of paraphrasing, summary, or quoting; using information in ways that are true to original context; distinguishing between common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution).
Unformatted Attachment Preview
RESEARCH TOPIC PROPOSAL.
Page 1
Leveraging Innovative Technology for Enhanced Healthcare
Delivery Outcomes in the United States.
In recent years, incorporating modern technologies into healthcare systems has
promised to revolutionize patient care delivery. This study examines how healthcare workers
adopting new technologies affect patients’ healthcare outcomes at US medical facilities. By
investigating this link, the project hopes to identify the effectiveness, obstacles, and potential
of employing technology to improve healthcare delivery (Jain, 2023).
The research will look into numerous critical topics. It will first analyze the present
state of technology adoption in healthcare institutions, including the sorts of technologies and
how they are integrated into healthcare procedures. Furthermore, it will examine how novel
technology affects diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and communication among healthcare
providers (Wankhede et al., 2023).
Furthermore, the study will examine how deploying breakthrough technologies affects
patient outcomes like treatment effectiveness and overall healthcare quality. It will also
identify potential technology integration barriers, such as financial constraints and healthcare
professionals’ resistance to change. Finally, the study will look into measures for maximizing
technological benefits while minimizing dangers, including best practices for adoption,
professional training, and protecting patient privacy and data security (Dougherty & Conway,
2008).
Research question.
How does the use of innovative technologies by healthcare professionals affect patient
outcomes in medical institutions in the United States?
Audience.
RESEARCH TOPIC PROPOSAL.
Page 2
The primary audience for this study is healthcare administrators, policymakers,
technology developers, and healthcare professionals who want to know how technology
adoption affects patient care delivery. Their key concerns include the effectiveness of
technology in enhancing patient outcomes, implementation tactics, and approaches to
overcoming technological integration problems (Bhatti et al., 2017).
Barriers.
Potential barriers to this research include a lack of comprehensive data on healthcare
outcomes and technology adoption, difficulties in establishing causal relationships between
technology use and patient outcomes, ethical concerns about patient privacy and data
security, and limitations in generalizability due to differences in healthcare settings and
technology implementation strategies (Carr et al., 2006).
References.
RESEARCH TOPIC PROPOSAL.
Page 3
Carr, K., Bangalore, D., Benin, A., & Holmboe, E. S. (2006). Leveraging the benefits of
health information technology to support healthcare delivery model redesign. Journal
of Healthcare Information Management, 20(1), 31.
Bhatti, Y., Taylor, A., Harris, M., Wadge, H., Escobar, E., Prime, M., … & Udayakumar, K.
(2017). Global lessons in Frugal innovation to improve health care delivery in the
United States. Health Affairs, 36(11), 1912-1919.
Dougherty, D., & Conway, P. H. (2008). The “3 T’s” road map to transform US health care:
the “how” of high-quality care. Jama, 299(19), 2319-2321.
Wankhede, D., Mishra, V., Karnik, M., Kekane, A., & Shukla, A. (2023, October). The
Impact of the Latest Technology on Healthcare and how it can be leveraged to
improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. In 2023 4th IEEE Global
Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Jain, P. (2023). Leveraging cloud-enabled teleconsultation for enhanced patient care: a
paradigm shift in healthcare.
The instructor comments:
Good work! If there are any particular technologies you’re interested in exploring
I’d recommend
including them in your research question.
That can help focus your topic a bit more.
A note on your references list:
-Make sure you’re double checking formatting — capitalizations, italicizations, indentations, and alphabetically
listing your references by author last name
1
Leveraging Innovative Technology for Enhanced Healthcare
Delivery Outcomes in the United States
Research Question
In what ways do patient outcomes in leading hospitals in the USA differ, like the use of new
technologies by healthcare professionals?
Thesis Statement
The utilization of advanced technologies in healthcare facilities all over the United States
has a significant impact on patient outcomes since it promotes better diagnosis accuracy,
treatment efficiency, and communication among healthcare providers and enhances the quality
of healthcare.
Sources
Background Source
Title: ” Leveraging Technology to Enhance Access to Healthcare and Manage Medical
Waste: Practices from Emerging Countries”
Authors: Khalil, Z. T., & Rahman, S. (2023).
Category: Background
The source elaborates on the indispensable role of health information technology in driving
the transformation of healthcare delivery models. It explores the positive and negative
implications of implementing technology in healthcare settings. It does so by providing a
holistic view of these dynamics, thus building a framework for evaluating the effect of new
technologies on healthcare results and quality in the US.
Exhibit Source
Title: ” The impact of technology in healthcare ”
Authors: Technology, E. (2023, March 2)
Category: Exhibit
2
The source highlights direct instances and demonstrations of how technology integration
affects health outcomes. Empirically, it shows the conversational practicalities of
implementing innovative technologies within healthcare settings. Such examples verify the
anticipated gains of technology adoption in care delivery and provide practical details on how
it is implemented and where it is most effective in improving patient care.
Argument Source:
Title: “Doing more with less – How frugal innovations can contribute to improving
healthcare systems”
Authors: Sarkar, S., & Mateus, S. (2022).
Category: Argument
The source points out that frugal innovation are indispensable in healthcare, highlighting its
ability to optimize finite resources by harnessing innovative technologies. It points out that in
resource-limited settings, such innovations not only have practical value but can also make a
significant impact on health outcomes. Through proper utilization of technology in healthcare,
providers can tackle challenges and enhance patient care even when resources and
infrastructure are limited.
Method Source
Title: “Predictive factors of physicians’ satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance”
Author: Kissi, J., Dai, B., Dogbe, C. S. K., Banahene, J., & Ernest, O. (2019).
Category: Method
The source presents an integrated framework for the cloud-based telecon-tact to improve
medical services. It deals with the practical techniques for integrating such technology into
healthcare delivery systems, which is mainly about the method to harness the benefits of such
technology. By offering implementation methods and optimization techniques, the source
3
becomes a useful informational piece on innovative engineering solutions for healthcare
providers who want to improve patient care.
Conclusion
Adopting the latest technologies of healthcare in the delivery of healthcare services has a
great chance of improving the outcomes of patients in medical institutions in the USA. Health
information technologies like cloud-based teleconsultation systems advance diagnostics,
intelligent solutions, and communication among healthcare providers, resulting in better
healthcare delivery. Despite challenges like the financial barrier and resistance to change, the
experience gained from case studies and frugal innovation initiatives can be used to prove the
argument for technology adoption in healthcare. Healthcare facilities can overcome the barriers
through cutting-edge technologies and enjoy the benefits of the new landscape of healthcare
delivery. The patients can have improved outcomes as a result.
4
References
Khalil, Z. T., & Rahman, S. (2023). Leveraging Technology to Enhance Access to Healthcare
and Manage Medical Waste: Practices from Emerging Countries. In Emerald Publishing
Limited eBooks (pp. 187–206). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-640-520231012
Kissi, J., Dai, B., Dogbe, C. S. K., Banahene, J., & Ernest, O. (2019). Predictive factors of
physicians’ satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance. Health Informatics Journal,
26(3), 1866–1880. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219892162
Sarkar, S., & Mateus, S. (2022). Doing more with less – How frugal innovations can
contribute to improving healthcare systems. Social Science & Medicine, 306, 115127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115127
Technology, E. (2023, March 2). The impact of technology in healthcare. Retrieved from
https://www.elcom.com.au/resources/blog/the-impact-of-technology-in-healthcare-trendsbenefits-examples
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
