Description
CONTROVERSY ASSOCIATED WITH DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS
The DSM-5-TR is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5-TR, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.
In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
TO PREPARE
Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.
Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.
THE ASSIGNMENT (2–3 PAGES)
Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9
Submit your Assignment
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.
13 to >11.0 pts
Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
13 to >11.0 pts
Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains one or two APA format errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains three or four APA format errors
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
Boland, R. Verdiun, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 11, “Dissociative Disorders”
Required Media
Osmosis. (2017, November 20). Dissociative disorders – causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, pathologyLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. Links to an external site.
Mad Medicine. (2019, August 18). Dissociative disorders (Psychiatry) – USMLE Step 1Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. Links to an external site.
Grande, T. (2018, October 22). The dissociative identity disorder controversy (Trauma vs. Iatrogenic)Links to an external site.. [Video]. YouTube.
