Description
Evaluating Primary Sources-Document 16.3 .docxPRIMARY SOURCE 16.3 The Azamgarh Proclamation (1857), Bahadur Shah The Indian leaders of the Rebellion of 1857 issued numerous proclamations. The Azamgarh Proclamation, excerpted below, is one of many. The emperor, Bahadur Shah, issued it in August 1857 on behalf of the mutineers who had seized the garrison town of Azamgarh. It attacks the British for subverting Indian traditions and calls on the rebellion’s followers to restore the precolonial order. Identify the rebels’ main grievances against the English. Analyze the role of religion in the rebellion. Explain the significance of commerce and property for the rebels. 25th. August, 1857. It is well known to all, that in this age the people of Hindoostan, both Hindoos and Mohammedans, are being ruined under the tyranny and oppression of the infidel and treacherous English. It is therefore the bounden duty of all the wealthy people of India, especially of those who have any sort of connection with any of the Mohammedan royal families, and are considered the pastors and masters of their people, to stake their lives and property for the well being of the public. With the view of effecting this general good, several princes belonging to the royal family of Delhi, have dispersed themselves in the different parts of India, Iran, Turan, and Afghanistan, and have been long since taking measures to compass their favourite end; and it is to accomplish this charitable object that one of the aforesaid princes has, at the head of an army of Afghanistan, &c., made his appearance in India; and I, who am the grandson of Abul Muzuffer Serajuddin Bahadur Shah Ghazee, King of India, having in the course of circuit come here to extirpate the infidels residing in the eastern part of the country, and to liberate and protect the poor helpless people now groaning under their iron rule, have, by the aid of the Majahdeens [religious warriors], erected the standard of Mohammed, and persuaded the orthodox Hindoos who had been subject to my ancestors, and have been and are still accessories in the destruction of the English, to raise the standard of Mahavir. Several of the Hindoo and Mussalman chiefs, who have long since quitted their homes for the preservation of their religion, and have been trying their best to root out the English in India, have presented themselves to me, and taken part in the reigning Indian crusade, and it is more than probable that I shall very shortly receive succours from the West. Therefore, for the information of the public, the present Ishtahar, consisting of several sections, is put in circulation, and it is the imperative duty of all to take it into their careful consideration, and abide by it. Parties anxious to participate in the common cause, but having no means to provide for themselves, shall receive their daily subsistence from me; and be it known to all, that the ancient works, both of the Hindoos and the Mohammedans, the writings of the miracle-workers, and the calculations of the astrologers, pundits, and rammals, all agree in asserting that the English will no longer have any footing in India or elsewhere. Therefore it is incumbent on all to give up the hope of the continuation of the British sway, side with me, and deserve the consideration of the Badshahi, or imperial Government, by their individual exertion in promoting the common good, and thus attain their respective ends; otherwise if this golden opportunity slips away, they will have to repent of their folly, as it is very aptly said by a poet in two fine couplets, the drift whereof is “Never let a favourable opportunity slip, for in the field of opportunity you are to meet with the ball of fortune; but if you do not avail yourself of the opportunity that offers itself, you will have to bite your finger through grief.” No person, at the misrepresentation of the well-wishers of the British Government, ought to conclude from the present slight inconveniences usually attendant on revolutions, that similar inconveniences and troubles should continue when the Badshahi Government is established on a firm basis; and parties badly dealt with by any sepoy or plunderer, should come up and represent their grievances to me, and receive redress at my hands; and for whatever property they may lose in the reigning disorder, they will be recompensed from the public treasury when the Badshahi Government is well fixed. . . . Section II—Regarding Merchants. It is plain that the infidel and treacherous British Government have monopolized the trade of all the fine and valuable merchandise, such as indigo, cloth, and other articles of shipping, leaving only the trade of trifles to the people, and even in this they are not without their share of the profits, which they secure by means of customs and stamp fees, &c. in money suits, so that the people have merely a trade in name. Besides this, the profits of the traders are taxed, with postages, tolls, and subscriptions for schools, &c. Notwithstanding all these concessions, the merchants are liable to imprisonment and disgrace at the instance or complaint of a worthless man. When the Badshahi Government is established, all these aforesaid fraudulent practices shall be dispensed with, and the trade of every article, without exception, both by land and water, shall be open to the native merchants of India, who will have the benefit of the Government steam-vessels and steam-carriages for the conveyance of their merchandise gratis; and merchants having no capital of their own shall be assisted from the public treasury. It is therefore the duty of every merchant to take part in the war, and aid the Badshahi Government with his men and money, either secretly or openly, as may be consistent with his position or interest, and forswear his allegiance to the British Government. Section III—Regarding Public Servants. It is not a secret thing, that under the British Government, natives employed in the civil and military services, have little respect, low pay, and no manner of influence; and all the posts of dignity and emolument in both the departments, are exclusively bestowed on Englishmen for natives in the military service, after having devoted the greater part of their lives, attain to the post of soobadar (the very height of their hopes) with a salary of 60r. or 70r. per mensem; and those in the civil service obtain the post of Sudder Ala, with a salary of 500 r. a month, but no influence, jagheer, or present. . . . Therefore, all the natives in the British service ought to be alive to their religion and interest, and, abjuring their loyalty to the English, side with the Badshahi Government, and obtain salaries of 200 or 300 rupees per month for the present, and be entitled to high posts in future. If they, for any reason, cannot at present declare openly against the English, they can heartily wish ill to their cause, and remain passive spectators of passing events, without taking any active share therein. But at the same time they should indirectly assist the Badshahi Government, and try their best to drive the English out of the country. . . . Section IV—Regarding Artisans. It is evident that the Europeans, by the introduction of English articles into India, have thrown the weavers, the cotton dressers, the carpenters, the blacksmiths, and the shoemakers, &c., out of employ, and have engrossed their occupations, so that every description of native artisan has been reduced to beggary. But under the Badshahi Government the native artisans will exclusively be employed in the services of the kings, the rajahs, and the rich; and this will no doubt ensure their prosperity. Therefore these artisans ought to renounce the English services, and assist the Majahdeens, engaged in the war, and thus be entitled both to secular and eternal happiness. Section V—Regarding Pundits, Fakirs and other learned persons. The pundits and fakirs being the guardians of the Hindoo and Mohammedan religions respectively, and the Europeans being the enemies of both the religions, and as at present a war is raging against the English on account of religion, the pundits and fakirs are bound to present themselves to me, and take their share in the holy war. . . . Lastly, be it known to all, that whoever, out of the above named classes, shall after the circulation of this Ishtahar, still cling to the British Government, all his estates shall be confiscated, and his property plundered, and he himself, with his whole family, shall be imprisoned, and ultimately put to death. Source: Ainslie T. Embree (ed.), 1857 in India: Mutiny or War of Independence? (Boston: D. C. Heath, 1963), pp. 1–3.Above is the required text to read and the required questions to answer. There are 11 questions so there should be 11 paragrsphs
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Evaluating Primary Source 16.3 —Where is the document located? (At the end of
chapter 16 in whichever version-hard copy or e-text you have)
Please read “The Azamgarh Proclamation (1857),” by Bahadur Shah, and answer questions
SEPARATELY NOT IN AN ESSAY FORMAT
A small paragraph per question is sufficient even if a question i.e question 5 has more questions
than one. A 3-4 sentence of paragraph would be fine .You may write 1000 words for ALL
questions, but if you need to write more please feel free to do so. 1000 is the minimum
requirement.
In short: 3-4-sentence paragraph per question, written separately. 11 paragraphs in total since
there are 11 questions.
SUBMIT WORK IN WORD OR PDF FILE ONLY!
1. Who created the document? If it was written by an individual, what is the background
and social status of that person? Is the person neutral, or might he or she have had
opinions or beliefs that influenced his or her writing? If the document was written by a
government body or corporation, you should also question whether that organization is
neutral or not.
2. How does the author know what happened? Did the individual or group take part in or
witness the event? Or is the document based on what others saw and heard? What does
the answer imply about the document’s credibility?
3. When and where was the document created? Historians judge historical documents
according to the time and place rule—the closer in time and place an author and source
were to an event, the more reliable that source might be. A historical document created
during the event or immediately after it is usually more reliable than a document created
many years after the event took place.
4. In what historical context was the document created? It is important to know this because
the author might have been influenced by the beliefs and attitudes of that time. Is the
historical document like or different from other primary sources created at that time?
5. What is the main point that the author is discussing? What evidence does the author use
to support this point? What is the tone of the document? Remember that authors may use
sarcasm or jokes or exaggeration in their writings.
6. Why was the document created? Did the author want to inform or persuade others?
Remember that the author of a document is writing about an event from his or her
viewpoint or may even be trying to convince you that something happened or needs to
happen.
7. As you read, keep the bias rule in mind, which states that every source is biased, or
writing about an event from his or her viewpoint, in some way. Read the document
carefully and critically. Are there any words that lead you to believe that the source is
biased? After you have finished reading the historical document, compare it against other
primary and secondary sources to determine whether the information is reliable and
accurate. Remember that even though an author may be biased, the historical document
can still contain much valuable information.
8. If the document is a translation from a different language, ask yourself similar questions
about the translator: Does the translator have a viewpoint or agenda? What are his or her
credentials? When was the translation created? Are other translations of the same original
text available for comparison?
9. What was the purpose of the original historic document? Was it meant for a large
audience, like a law or a court decision? Or was it a personal source meant for a very
small audience, like a letter or a diary? Remember that even a published document may
not be accurate. An unpublished document may provide crucial and fascinating details
about an event because the author assumed it would never be seen by the public.
10. Who was the intended or likely audience? What do you know about the audience?
11. How is this document interpreted today? Does your knowledge of the event affect your
interpretation of the document?
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
