Description
Please no AI, because it will go through turnitin. You will need 5 articles for the reference list and only the top 2 articles in the evidence table. Utilize the feedback received so far upon completing this assignment!
Unformatted Attachment Preview
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
1
Evidence Table and Reference List
Author name
Midwestern State University
Date
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
2
Evidence Table and Reference LIst
Reference List
** Delete the instructions before you construct your reference list here.**
You have demonstrated literature support for the practice problem and elaborated on the
significance of the problem, as well as developed a compelling PICOT statement to drive
inquiry. In the PICOT worksheets and Discussion #5, you have begun your search for the best
current evidence. Utilize the databases and steps for a successful literature search found in the
assignment instructions. The purpose of this assignment is to search for a total of 5 articles to
support the evidence-based intervention in the PICOT statement. The articles must be
quantitative. Do not include qualitative literature to support your project. All literature must be
contemporary (published within the last 5 years) and found from credible and reliable sources. .
You will need 5 articles for the reference list and only the top 2 articles in the
evidence table.
Create a reference list of your 5 articles in APA 7th edition format. Review each of the 5
articles and select the top 2 articles for the evidence table summary assignment. Identify the
articles that unequivocally support the evidence-based intervention and show the intervention
successfully impacts the outcomes in a similar population and similar setting in your PICOT
question. Use the directions for use of the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice
Individual Evidence Summary Tool in order to add the top 2 articles from your reference list to
the evidence table.
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
3
Directions for Use of the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based
Practice Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Practice Question: List the one-sentence PICOT statement here.
Purpose: This form is used to document the results of evidence appraisal in preparation for
evidence synthesis. The form provides the EBP team with documentation of the sources of
evidence used, the year the evidence was published or otherwise communicated, the information
gathered from each evidence source that helps the team answer the EBP question, and the level and
quality of each source of evidence.
Article Number: Assign a number to each reviewed source of evidence. The table should be
organized in order of level of evidence, thus the article number, this this provides an easy way to
reference articles.
Author and Date: Indicate the last name of the first author or the evidence source and the
publication/communication date. List both author/evidence source and date.
Evidence Type: Indicate the type of evidence reviewed (e.g., RCT, meta-analysis, mixed methods,
qualitative, systematic review, case study, narrative literature review).
Sample, Sample Size, and Setting: Provide a quick view of the population, number of participants,
and study location.
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question: Although the reviewer may find many points of
interest, list only findings that directly apply to the EBP question.
Observable Measures: Quantitative measures or variables are used to answer a research question,
test a hypothesis, describe characteristics, or determine the effect, impact, or influence. Qualitative
evidence uses cases, context, opinions, experiences, and thoughts to represent the phenomenon of
study.
Limitations: Include information that may or may not be within the text of the article regarding
drawbacks of the piece of evidence. The evidence may list limitations, or it may be evident to you, as
you review the evidence, that an important point is missed or the sample does not apply to the
population of interest.
Evidence Level and Quality: Using information from the individual appraisal tools, transfer the
evidence level and quality rating into this column. See Johns Hopkins Table Evidence Level and
Quality Guide.
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
4
Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Individual Evidence Summary Tool
© The Johns Hopkins Hospital/ The Johns Hopkins University
Practice Question: Include one-sentence PICOT here
Date:
Article
Number
(this table should be single space)
Author and Date
Evidence Type
Sample, Sample
Size, Setting
❑ N/A
❑ N/A
❑ N/A
❑ N/A
❑ N/A
❑ N/A
Findings That Help Answer the
EBP Question
Observable
Measures
Limitations
Evidence Level,
Quality
NURS 6843: Evidence Table and Reference List Rubric
12.5
10.5
8.5
Score to be used for
each of the sections
below:
Inclusion of 5
Number of required
articles in reference references is met. All
list
references are relevant to
the project topic.
References are current
(published within the last
five years). All references
are from credible
sources.
Reference list and
All references reflect
paper formatting
APA style and format
elements are correct
(minimal to no errors).
Evidence Table:
Article number,
Author and date,
Evidence Type
Evidence Table:
Sample, Sample
Size, and Setting.
NURS 6843: EBP I
The top 2 articles from
the reference list are
included with author and
date. Formatted
according to evidence
level and type and are
alphabetized within each
level.
Sample (population),
Sample size (Number of
participants), and Setting
6.5
0
Number of
required
references is only
met partially
and/or not all
references are
relevant or not
from credible
sources.
Appropriate
template is used,
but some
elements are
missing or
mistaken. A lack
of control with
formatting is
apparent.
Number of
required
references is
not met and/or
references are
not relevant or
not from
credible
sources.
Template is
not used
appropriately,
or
documentation
format is rarely
followed
correctly.
Number of
required
references is only
met partially and
formatting of
evidence level and
type is incorrect.
Did not
address and/or
did not format
correctly.
Number of required
references is met.
References are current
and from credible
sources, but not all
references are relevant
to the project topic.
Number of required
references is met.
Not all references
are relevant or not
from credible
sources.
Appropriate template is
fully used. There are
virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Appropriate
template is used.
Formatting is
correct, although
some minor errors
may be present.
The top 2 articles from
the reference list are
included with author
and date, but not all
formatting of evidence
level and type is correct.
Number of required
references is met,
however formatting
of evidence level
and type is
incorrect.
Sample, sample size,
and setting is present
Sample, sample size, Sample, sample
and setting is
size, and setting is
present, but may
present, but lacks
Did not
address.
Page 1
(Study location) is
included for all 2 articles
and thorough and
comprehensive.
Discussion of how the
literature supports the
EBP question for the
evidence-based project is
exemplary. It is accurate
and clear. It
demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
for all 2 articles and well
developed.
not be well
developed.
detail or is
incomplete.
Discussion of how the
literature supports the
EBP question for the
evidence-based project
is included. It frequently
demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
Discussion of the
observable measures
used in the study findings
is exemplary. It is
accurate and clear. It
demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
Discussion of the
observable measures
used in the study
findings is included. It
frequently demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
Discussion of
how the literature
supports the EBP
question for the
evidence-based
project reflects a
lack of
understanding.
Lacks
organization,
independent
thinking.
Discussion of the
observable
measures used in
the study findings
reflects a lack of
understanding.
Lacks
organization,
independent
thinking.
Did not
address.
Evidence Table:
Observable
Measures
Evidence Table:
Limitations
Discussion of limitations
of the study is exemplary.
It is accurate and clear. It
demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
Discussion of the
limitations of the study
findings is included. It
frequently demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
Discussion of how
the literature
supports the EBP
question for the
evidence-based
project is included,
but sometimes lacks
clarity. It
demonstrates some
independent,
original, and
creative thinking.
Discussion of the
observable
measures used in
the study findings is
included, but
sometimes lacks
clarity. It
demonstrates some
independent,
original, and
creative thinking.
Discussion of the
limitations of the
study is included,
but sometimes lacks
clarity. It
demonstrates some
independent,
Discussion of the
limitations of the
study reflects a
lack of
understanding.
Lacks
organization,
Did not
address.
Evidence Table:
Findings that help
answer the EBP
questions
NURS 6843: EBP I
Did not
address.
Page 2
Evidence Table:
Evidence Level and
Quality
NURS 6843: EBP I
Evidence level and
quality designation based
on the Johns Hopkins
Table Evidence Level
and Quality Guide is
exemplary. It
demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
Evidence level and
quality designation
based on the Johns
Hopkins Table
Evidence Level and
Quality Guide is
included. It frequently
demonstrates
independent, original,
and creative thinking.
original, and
creative thinking.
Evidence level and
quality designation
based on the Johns
Hopkins Table
Evidence Level and
Quality Guide is
included, but
sometimes lacks
clarity. It
demonstrates some
independent,
original, and
creative thinking.
independent
thinking.
Evidence level
and quality
designation based
on the Johns
Hopkins Table
Evidence Level
and Quality
Guide reflects a
lack of
understanding.
Lacks
organization,
independent
thinking.
Did not
address.
Page 3
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
Evidence Table and Reference List
Author name
Midwestern State University
Date
1
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
2
Evidence Table and Reference List
Reference List
Lee, P. A., Greenfield, G., & Pappas, Y. (2018). The impact of telehealth remote patient
monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and metaanalysis of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. BMC Health Services
Research, 18(1), 495. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3274-8
McKenzie, A. L., Hallberg, S. J., Creighton, B. C., Volk, B. M., Link, T. M., Abner, M. K.,
Glon, R. M., McCarter, J. P., Volek, J. S., & Phinney, S. D. (2017). A novel intervention
including individualized nutritional recommendations reduce hemoglobin A1c level,
medication use, and weight in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Medical Internet Research:
Diabetes, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/ doi:10.2196/diabetes.6981
Marincic, P. Z., Salazar, M. V., Hardin, A., Scott, S., Fan, S. X., Gaillard, P. R., Wyatt, C.,
Watson, L., Green, P., Glover, P., & Hand, M. (2019). Diabetes self-management
education and medical nutrition therapy: A multisite study documenting the efficacy of
registered dietitian nutritionist interventions in the management of glycemic control and
diabetic dyslipidemia through retrospective chart review. Journal of the Academy of
Nutrition and Dietetics, 119(3), 449-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2018.06.303
Mottalib, A., Salsberg, V., Barakatun-Nisak, M., Mohamed, W., Carolan, P., Pober, D. M., Mitri,
J., & Hamdy, O. (2018). Effects of nutrition therapy of HbA1c and cardiovascular disease
risk factors in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutrition Journal,
17(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0351-0
Taheri, S., Zaghloul, H., Chagoury, O., Elhadad, S., Hayder Ahmed, S., El Khatib, N., Abou
Amona, R., El Nahas, K., Suleiman, N., Alnaama, A., Al-Hamaq, A., Charlson, M.,
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
Wells, M. T., Al-Abdulla, S., & Abou-Samra, A. B. (2020). Effect of intensive lifestyle
intervention on bodyweight and glycemia in early type 2 diabetes (DIADEM-I): An
open-label, parallel-group. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 8(6), 477-489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30117-0
3
EVIDENCE TABLE AND REFERENCE LIST
4
Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice
Appendix G: Individual Evidence Summary Tool
© The Johns Hopkins Hospital/The Johns Hopkins University
Practice Question: For adults diagnosed with type II diabetes at a primary care setting, will implementation of the American Diabetes Association (ADA)
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021: Recommendation 5: Medical Nutritional Therapy components, compared to current practice, improve glycated
hemoglobin (HbA1c) in 16 weeks?
Date: December 8, 2021
Article
Number
Author and Date
Evidence Type
Sample, Sample
Size, Setting
2
McKenzie, A. L.,
Randomized
Hallberg, S. J., Creighton, Controlled Trial
B. C., Volk, B. M., Link,
T. M., Abner, M. K.,
Glon, R. M., McCarter, J.
P., Volek, J. S., &
Phinney, S. D. (2017).
Sample: Male and
female adults with type
2 diabetes, 21 to 65
years old.
Sample size: 262
patients
Setting: Outpatient
clinic.
4
Mottalib, A., Salsberg, V.,
Barakatun-Nisak, M.,
Randomized
Mohamed, W., Carolan, Controlled Trial
P., Pober, D. M., Mitri, J.,
& Hamdy, O. (2018).
Findings That Help Answer
the EBP Question
Observable
Measures
Limitations
Evidence
Level, Quality
Following an individualized nutrition plan
hemoglobin A1c, medication use, and
Hemoglobin A1c
Intervention
Level: I
weight decreased in patients with type II (HbA1c) and related compliance was selfdiabetes.
biomarkers of T2D reported.
Quality: A
were evaluated at
After 16 weeks, HbA1c level was
baseline and 16The brief duration of
reduced. 47.7% of participants
week follow-up.
this initial study
achieved an HbA1c level of
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
