Description
Overview
For this Performance Task Assessment, you will develop a narrated PowerPoint presentation explaining the levels of evidence in selected peer-reviewed articles and the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.
Submission Length: A 6- to 7-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation.
Your response to this Assessment should:
Reflect the criteria provided in the Rubric.
Adhere to the required assignment length.
This Assessment requires submission of one (1) file, a narrated PowerPoint presentation. Save your file as EB003_presentation_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB003_presentation_J_Smith).
You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.
Instructions
Access the following to complete this Assessment:
APA Presentation Template
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON INTERPRETING THE ASSESSMENT RUBRIC (CLICK TO EXPAND)
Achievement vs. Mastery of the Competency
Mastery of this Competency means that 80% or more of the rows have been assessed as Exceeds Expectations and no rows have been assessed as Does Not Meet Expectations.
Achievement of this Competency means that all rows are assessed at Meets Expectations or above (but lower than the 80% threshold required for Mastery).
Assessment of Individual Rubric Rows
In order to achieve Meets Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in that row. This means that you have addressed all required elements to the required level of quantity and/or quality.
In order to achieve Exceeds Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in the row, and in addition, your response must reflect a depth and breadth of knowledge and expertise. Examples of this include—but are not limited to—the following:
You provide additional, specific, and/or particularly relevant examples to illustrate points made.
You seamlessly incorporate your original thoughts and diverse, credible, and relevant academic sources, when applicable, to express your viewpoint or develop a persuasive argument.
You demonstrate a deeper understanding of the subject that draws from discipline-specific knowledge and theory and incorporates the viewpoints of a diverse set of business and management thought leaders.
You draw additional connections between multiple, complex topics to support your explanations.
You are able to apply your knowledge in unique, creative, and/or innovative ways.
You thoroughly break down concepts into simpler parts and use your understanding of business to make connections.
Your analysis is insightful and original.
You design processes, products, and/or solutions that are creative, high-quality, and innovative.
You consider diverse perspectives and relevant social, ethical, and business-related issues when proposing new ideas or formulating judgments.
Rubric
Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site.
To complete this Assessment:
Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. (Note: You are required to focus on the same clinical issue of interest in the competencies EB002–EB006.)
Develop a PICOT question to address your clinical issue of interest.
Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.
Create a 6- to 7-slide (total for all topics) narrated PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed your PICOT question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles that you selected.
Provide APA citations for the four peer-reviewed articles that you selected.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
Explain the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.
