Description
To support your work, use your resources and the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week.Discussion Question 1Discuss the physical assessment of a patient who presents with the complaint of cervical lymphadenopathy. What are the specific lymph nodes that you will assess? How do you palpate the lymph nodes, and what are the normal versus abnormal findings? In the presence of abnormal findings, what diagnostic tests would you order and why? Also, what are the possible differential diagnoses and would your recommendations differ for adult, pediatric, and geriatric patients?Discussion Question 2There are a number of differential diagnoses for adult patients that present with lower leg edema. Discuss the differential diagnoses for adult patients that present with lower leg edema. Include diagnostic testing and treatment. Why would you choose these tests? Include the differences between arterial insufficiency versus venous insufficiency.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Rubric Assessment – NSG6023-Nurse Practitioner Enhancement CP01 – South University
2/23/24, 9:05 PM
SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) – Version 1.2
Course: NSG6023-Nurse Practitioner Enhancement CP01
Response
Quality of Initial
Posting
Participation
Participation in
Discussion
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-27)
27 points
Satisfactory (C: 2831)
31 points
Proficient (B: 32-35)
35 points
Exemplary (A: 36-40)
40 points
Criterion Score
No initial posting
The information
The information
The information
The information
/ 40
exists to evaluate.
provided is
provided is accurate,
provided is accurate,
provided is accurate,
inaccurate, not
giving a basic
displaying a good
providing an in-depth,
focused on the
understanding of the
understanding of the
well thought-out
assignment’s topic,
topic(s) covered. A
topic(s) covered. A
understanding of the
and/or does not
basic understanding is
good understanding is
topic(s) covered. An
answer the
when you are able to
when you are able to
in-depth
question(s) fully.
describe the terms
explain the terms and
understanding
Response
and concepts covered.
topics covered. Initial
provides an analysis
demonstrates
Despite this basic
posting demonstrates
of the information,
incomplete
understanding, initial
sincere reflection and
synthesizing what is
understanding of the
posting may not
addresses most
learned from the
topic and/or
include complete
aspects of the
course/assigned
inadequate
development of all
assignment, although
readings.
preparation.
aspects of the
all concepts may not
assignment.
be fully developed.
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C: 1416)
16 points
Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points
Criterion Score
No responses to other
May include one or
Comments to two or
Comments to two or
Comments to two or
/ 20
classmates were
more of the following:
more classmates’
more classmates’
more classmates’
posted in this
*Comments to only
initial posts but only
initial posts on more
initial posts and to the
discussion forum.
one other student’s
on one day of the
than one day.
instructor’s comment
post.
week. Comments are
Comments are
(if applicable) on two
*Comments are not
substantive, meaning
substantive, meaning
or more days.
substantive, such as
they reflect and
they reflect and
Responses
just one line or saying,
expand on what the
expand on what the
demonstrate an
“Good job” or “I agree.
other student wrote.
other student wrote.
analysis of peers’
*Comments are off
comments, building
topic.
on previous posts.
Comments extend
and deepen
meaningful
conversation and may
include a follow-up
question.
Writing
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfaction (C: 1416)
16 points
Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points
Criterion Score
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/…=6574&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
Page 1 of 2
Rubric Assessment – NSG6023-Nurse Practitioner Enhancement CP01 – South University
Writing
Mechanics
(Spelling,
Grammar,
Citation Style)
and Information
Literacy
2/23/24, 9:05 PM
/ 20
No postings for which
Numerous issues in
Some spelling,
Minor errors in
Minor to no errors
to evaluate language
any of the following:
grammatical, and/or
grammar, mechanics,
exist in grammar,
and grammar exist.
grammar, mechanics,
structural errors are
or spelling in the
mechanics, or spelling
spelling, use of slang,
present. Some errors
initial posting are
in both the initial post
and incomplete or
in formatting citations
present. Minor errors
and comments to
missing citations and
and references are
in formatting citations
others. Formatting of
references. If required
present. If required
and references may
citations and
for the assignment,
for the assignment,
exist. If required for
references is correct.
did not use course,
utilizes sources to
the assignment,
If required for the
text, and/or outside
support work for
utilizes sources to
assignment, utilizes
readings (where
initial post but not
support work for both
sources to support
relevant) to support
comments to other
the initial post and
work for both the
work.
students. Sources
some of the
initial post and the
include course/text
comments to other
comments to other
readings but outside
students. Sources
students. Sources
sources (when
include course and
include course and
relevant) include non-
text readings as well
text readings as well
academic/authoritativ
as outside sources
as outside sources
e, such as Wikis and
(when relevant) that
(when relevant) that
.com resources.
are academic and
are academic and
authoritative (e.g.,
authoritative (e.g.,
journal articles, other
journal articles, other
text books, .gov Web
text books, .gov Web
sites, professional
sites, professional
organization Web
organization Web
sites, cases, statutes,
sites, cases, statutes,
or administrative
or administrative
rules).
rules).
Total
/ 80
Overall Score
No Submission
Emerging (F to D Range)
Satisfactory (C Range)
Proficient (B Range)
Exemplary (A Range)
0 points minimum
There was no
submission for this
assignment.
1 point minimum
Satisfactory progress has not been
met on the competencies for this
assignment.
56 points minimum
Satisfactory progress has been
achieved on the competencies for
this assignment.
64 points minimum
Proficiency has been achieved
on the competencies for this
assignment.
72 points minimum
The competencies for
this assignment have
been mastered.
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/…6574&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
Page 2 of 2
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
