Description
Week One Case Discussion
Notes on grading: The threaded discussion requires an initial post with at least three (unless otherwise stated) substantive responses to the ideas of other students for a minimum of 4 posts. An initial post offers an analysis of the prompt case supported by evidence (peer-reviewed literature, textbook) and requires organized writing. Citations/references must be inserted into the post and at the end using correct APA format. The analysis post should include an introduction, body containing your ideas, and conclusion for full credit. These don’t have to be long but need to structure your post. The analysis post must be completed by midnight (PST)/Wednesday. Responses to other students must ALSO be organized and complete. Response such as “I agree” or “good point” may help the group dynamics but won’t score points. Responses should add to the knowledge and thinking of the group. Responses can be a comprehensive paragraph with support evidence from the textbook or peer-reviewed literature. Responses are due by 11:59pm (PT), Saturday
PART 1. View the Video Meetings Bloody Meetings (2012) (5 min). Why do many people dislike meetings? Name Cleese’s 5 point model for a good meeting.
PART 2. View the video “Tuckman.”(20 minutes) Tuckman & Jensen’s model (1977) is the most well-known stage model of group development but there are several others which describes somewhat different sequences described in your text book and available on the Web. .
Which theory of group development better describes your own experiences in teams to which you have belonged? Give specifics.
Think of teams to which you have belonged. What are some activities that helped members socialize into the team?
Start a New Thread
