Description
Now that we have reviewed sampling and data collection in module five, now we will learn about how the data gets analyzed and what statistical methods or procedures are used to get the results. Please use both the Qualitative Analysis Reference Sheet, Quantitative Analysis Reference Sheet, and assigned readings to discuss the following questions with your peers.1. Review the article ” Parents’ Use of Praise and Criticism in a Sample of Young Children Seeking Mental Health Services” (Appendix A) use only pages 334-335 in your Polit and Beck text.Find one statistical test that was done on the data.Define the statistical test and discuss how the test was applied to the data.2. Please review the article “Post traumatic Growth After Birth Trauma: I Was Broken. Now I Am Unbreakable” (Appendix B) use only pages 342-344. in your Polit and Beck text.Define the data analysis method that was used in this study.Choose only one outcome of using the data method analysis and discuss it.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Module 6
Qualitative Analysis
Reference Sheet
Qualitative Terms
Content Analysis
Computer-assisted
qualitative data
analysis software
(CAQDAS).
Involves analyzing
the content of
narrative data to
identify prominent
themes and patterns
among the themes.
Theme
An abstract entity that
brings meaning and
identity to a current
experience.
Coding Schemes
• Descriptive
• Process
• Concept
• In vivo
• Holistic
Thematic
Analysis
Ethnographic
Analysis
Phenomenological
Analysis
Grounded Theory
Analysis
Flexible approach
to analyze data
from a descriptive
qualitative study
following an
established process
to identify and
define themes.
Analysis starts as soon
as researchers are in the
field. Looking for
patterns in behavior and
thoughts of
participants, comparing
one pattern against
another. Maps, flow
charts, and
organizational charts
are useful tools to
illustrate data being
collected.
There are three frequently
used methods for
descriptive
phenomenology.
Uses a method that
involves comparing
elements present in
one data source with
those in another.
For example, the
Braun & Clarke
approach.
Spradley’s classic
approach using 12 step
sequence which include
(domain analysis,
taxonomic analysis,
componential analysis,
and theme analysis).
Leininger approach
uses a four-step
ethnographic
framework.
Colaizzi (1978), uses
validation of results by
querying study
participants.
Giorgi (1985), view is that
it is inappropriate either to
return to participants to
validate findings or use
external judges to review
the analysis.
Van Kaam’s (1996)
method requires that
intersubjective agreement
be reached with other
expert judges.
Glaser approach,
Corbin & Strauss
approach, and
Charmaz
approach.
See page 267 Table
15.2 for
comparisons of each
approach.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
