Description
Please no AI on any of the papers. All the papers will go through turnitin.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
01/20/2024
In this discussion, you are asked to compare and contrast evidence-based In this
discussion you are asked to articulate the advanced practice registered nurse role and
responsibilities related to evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice in nursing is an
integration of research evidence, clinical expertise, and a patient’s preferences. Reflect on your
future role in advocating for the translation of evidence-based practice. Consider these reflective
questions/statements as you formulate your post:
1. What is the importance of utilization of credible and reliable research for evidence-based
practice translation?
2. How does evidence-based practice benefit nursing and patients?
3. What is the advantage of evidence-based practice for healthcare organizations?
4. What role do you see for yourself in the efficient and timely implementation of evidence into
practice to help improve the health of patients?
5. What are some of the characteristics essential to fostering a productive evidence -based
implementation team environment?
6. How can you as the advanced practice nurse contribute to an organizational culture that
promotes and rewards collaboration?
Engage in meaningful dialogue with substantive posts, as well as incorporate at least three (3)
different scholarly sources each week – include an in-text citation for each source using APA
7th edition formatting. Review the Discussion Guidelines and Rubric document for more
information.
practice (EBP), Quality Improvement (QI), and nursing research. What
are the similarities and/or the differences between EBP and research? Explain
the role of research as it will pertain to the EBP project you will complete while
in EBP I and EBP II.
Engage in meaningful dialogue with substantive posts, as well as incorporate at
least three (3) different scholarly sources each week – include an in-text citation
for each source using APA 7th edition formatting. Review the Discussion
Guidelines and Rubric document for more information.
NURS 6843: EBP I Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussion is to engage faculty and students in an
interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically
appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from
credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information
to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and
information and fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and
knowledge are shared.
Instructions for Discussion Criteria
1. Application of Knowledge
a. Discuss the weekly question(s) accurately and fully address all questions and topics
b. Use personal experiences or examples from the healthcare field
2. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
a. Respond to a student peer or course faculty furthering dialogue by providing more
information and clarification thereby adding more depth to the discussion
b. For full credit, students must provide at minimum three substantive posts: one (1) to
the initial question or topic by Wednesday evening and a minimum of two (2)
substantive responses to your student colleagues and/or professors by Sunday
evening.
3. Integration of Evidence
a. Incorporate at least three (3) different scholarly sources each week – include an in-text
citation for each source
4. Professionalism in Communication
a. Present information in an organized manner
b. Use clear and concise language
c. Communicate with no error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and
punctuation.
d. Use correct APA style for references and in-text citations
Writing Requirements (APA format)
• 12-point Times New Roman font
• In-text citations
• Reference list in correct APA format
• Standard English usage and mechanics
• A scholarly source is (a) evidence-based, (b) peer-reviewed, and (c) published in last five (5)
years
• Response post(s) may require a scholarly citation and reference
Due Date
• Initial posting due Wednesday at 11:59 pm CT
• All posting completed by 11:59 p.m. CT on Sunday
Score to be used for
each of the sections
below:
Application of
Course
Knowledge:
Answers the initial
discussion
question(s)/topic(s),
demonstrating
knowledge and
understanding of
the concepts for the
week.
Engagement in
Meaningful
Dialogue With
Peers and Faculty:
The student
responds to a
student peer and/or
course faculty to
further dialogue by
Sunday at 11:59
p.m. CT
Integration of
Evidence:
Includes three
scholarly sources to
support concepts
for the week.
These sources may
be evident across
25
NURS 6843: EBP I Discussion Rubric
21
17
Addresses all aspects of
the initial discussion
question(s) applying
experiences, knowledge,
and understanding.
Addresses most
aspects of the initial
discussion question(s)
applying experiences,
knowledge, and
understanding.
Responds to a student
peer AND course
faculty furthering the
dialogue by providing
more information and
clarification, thereby
adding much depth to
the discussion.
Sources are credited.*
At least 3 scholarly
sources to support
posts.
13
Addresses some
aspects of the initial
discussion
question(s) applying
experiences,
knowledge, and
understanding.
0
Does not address
the initial
question(s).
Responds to a student
peer AND course
faculty furthering the
dialogue by adding
some depth to the
discussion.
Addresses some
aspects of the initial
discussion
question(s)
applying
experiences,
knowledge, and
understanding but
with noted
inaccuracies and
not focused.
Responds to a
Responds to a
student peer and/or student peer
course faculty, adding and/or course
minimal depth to
faculty, adding
the discussion.
minimal depth
to the discussion.
Sources are
credited.*
Sources are
credited.*
No scholarly
source provided to
support posts.
At least 2 scholarly
sources to support
posts.
At least 1 scholarly
source to support
posts.
N/A
No response
post to another
student or
course faculty.
the 3 postings.
Professionalism in
Communication
Present information
in an organized
manner using clear
and concise
language with no
errors and in APA
style.
Presents information
using clear and concise
language in an
organized manner (0–1
error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents information
using clear and
concise language in an
organized manner (1–
2 error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents information
using understandable
language; information
is not organized (2-3
error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents
information that is
not clear, logical,
professional, or
organized to the
point that the
reader has
difficulty
understanding the
post 4-5 error
patterns in English
grammar, spelling,
syntax, and/or
punctuation).
Presents
information that is
not clear, logical,
professional, or
organized to the
point that the
reader has
difficulty
understanding the
post 6 or more
error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax,
and/or
punctuation).
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens.
Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. CT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday
by 11:59 p.m. CT.
Faculty may submit any collaborative discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.
* Using APA style and formatting, in text citations are included for all sources. Matching references are included for all in-text
citations. Due to the formatting constraints of D2L, references included in the discussion must include complete information.
D2L will not allow a hanging indent; it is not required.
Discussion 2 01/20/2024
In this discussion you are asked to articulate the advanced practice registered nurse role and
responsibilities related to evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice in nursing is an
integration of research evidence, clinical expertise, and a patient’s preferences. Reflect on your
future role in advocating for the translation of evidence-based practice. Consider these reflective
questions/statements as you formulate your post:
1. What is the importance of utilization of credible and reliable research for evidence-based
practice translation?
2. How does evidence-based practice benefit nursing and patients?
3. What is the advantage of evidence-based practice for healthcare organizations?
4. What role do you see for yourself in the efficient and timely implementation of evidence into
practice to help improve the health of patients?
5. What are some of the characteristics essential to fostering a productive evidence -based
implementation team environment?
6. How can you as the advanced practice nurse contribute to an organizational culture that
promotes and rewards collaboration?
Engage in meaningful dialogue with substantive posts, as well as incorporate at least three (3)
different scholarly sources each week – include an in-text citation for each source using APA
7th edition formatting. Review the Discussion Guidelines and Rubric document for more
information.
NURS 6843: EBP I Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussion is to engage faculty and students in an
interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically
appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from
credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information
to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and
information and fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and
knowledge are shared.
Instructions for Discussion Criteria
1. Application of Knowledge
a. Discuss the weekly question(s) accurately and fully address all questions and topics
b. Use personal experiences or examples from the healthcare field
2. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
a. Respond to a student peer or course faculty furthering dialogue by providing more
information and clarification thereby adding more depth to the discussion
b. For full credit, students must provide at minimum three substantive posts: one (1) to
the initial question or topic by Wednesday evening and a minimum of two (2)
substantive responses to your student colleagues and/or professors by Sunday
evening.
3. Integration of Evidence
a. Incorporate at least three (3) different scholarly sources each week – include an in-text
citation for each source
4. Professionalism in Communication
a. Present information in an organized manner
b. Use clear and concise language
c. Communicate with no error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and
punctuation.
d. Use correct APA style for references and in-text citations
Writing Requirements (APA format)
• 12-point Times New Roman font
• In-text citations
• Reference list in correct APA format
• Standard English usage and mechanics
• A scholarly source is (a) evidence-based, (b) peer-reviewed, and (c) published in last five (5)
years
• Response post(s) may require a scholarly citation and reference
Due Date
• Initial posting due Wednesday at 11:59 pm CT
• All posting completed by 11:59 p.m. CT on Sunday
Score to be used for
each of the sections
below:
Application of
Course
Knowledge:
Answers the initial
discussion
question(s)/topic(s),
demonstrating
knowledge and
understanding of
the concepts for the
week.
Engagement in
Meaningful
Dialogue With
Peers and Faculty:
The student
responds to a
student peer and/or
course faculty to
further dialogue by
Sunday at 11:59
p.m. CT
Integration of
Evidence:
Includes three
scholarly sources to
support concepts
for the week.
These sources may
be evident across
25
NURS 6843: EBP I Discussion Rubric
21
17
Addresses all aspects of
the initial discussion
question(s) applying
experiences, knowledge,
and understanding.
Addresses most
aspects of the initial
discussion question(s)
applying experiences,
knowledge, and
understanding.
Responds to a student
peer AND course
faculty furthering the
dialogue by providing
more information and
clarification, thereby
adding much depth to
the discussion.
Sources are credited.*
At least 3 scholarly
sources to support
posts.
13
Addresses some
aspects of the initial
discussion
question(s) applying
experiences,
knowledge, and
understanding.
0
Does not address
the initial
question(s).
Responds to a student
peer AND course
faculty furthering the
dialogue by adding
some depth to the
discussion.
Addresses some
aspects of the initial
discussion
question(s)
applying
experiences,
knowledge, and
understanding but
with noted
inaccuracies and
not focused.
Responds to a
Responds to a
student peer and/or student peer
course faculty, adding and/or course
minimal depth to
faculty, adding
the discussion.
minimal depth
to the discussion.
Sources are
credited.*
Sources are
credited.*
No scholarly
source provided to
support posts.
At least 2 scholarly
sources to support
posts.
At least 1 scholarly
source to support
posts.
N/A
No response
post to another
student or
course faculty.
the 3 postings.
Professionalism in
Communication
Present information
in an organized
manner using clear
and concise
language with no
errors and in APA
style.
Presents information
using clear and concise
language in an
organized manner (0–1
error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents information
using clear and
concise language in an
organized manner (1–
2 error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents information
using understandable
language; information
is not organized (2-3
error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
punctuation).
Presents
information that is
not clear, logical,
professional, or
organized to the
point that the
reader has
difficulty
understanding the
post 4-5 error
patterns in English
grammar, spelling,
syntax, and/or
punctuation).
Presents
information that is
not clear, logical,
professional, or
organized to the
point that the
reader has
difficulty
understanding the
post 6 or more
error patterns in
English grammar,
spelling, syntax,
and/or
punctuation).
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens.
Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. CT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday
by 11:59 p.m. CT.
Faculty may submit any collaborative discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.
* Using APA style and formatting, in text citations are included for all sources. Matching references are included for all in-text
citations. Due to the formatting constraints of D2L, references included in the discussion must include complete information.
D2L will not allow a hanging indent; it is not required.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
