Description
Check the rubrics for activities
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Rubric for Research Project Paper.
Dimensions
Competent
Introduction
The introduction includes a statement of the
problem and briefly explains the
Significance of your topic study and acts to
introduce the reader to your definitions and
background.
Needs Improvement
Unacceptable
The introduction does not
include the problem.
No introduction.
2%
Body
The body of the paper summarizes the
findings of studies that have been conducted
on the topic. Briefly explained the purpose,
procedure for data collection and major
findings.
Demonstrates full knowledge of the topic.
Provides clear explanations of all elements
of the topic. Information is well-organized.
Points flow nicely in logical consistency.
Supports the conclusions/ideas with
evidence from the text. Provides both
positive and negative aspects of the topic.
1%
The body of the paper
does not summarize the
findings of studies that
have been conducted on
the topic and does not
explain the purpose,
procedure for data
collection and major
findings.
0%
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
Information appears to be
disorganized.
Presentation is difficult to
understand.
Does not demonstrate full
knowledge of the topic.
Clear explanations of
some elements of the
topic were not provided.
Information is organized.
flows well, occasionally
out the points. Supports
the conclusions/ideas
with some evidence from
the text. Provides some
positive and negative
aspects of the topic.
5%
3%
1%
Discussion
The discussion summarizes the body of the
paper and highlights the most important
findings (in your opinion).
The discussion did not
summarize the body of
the paper.
There is a sense of completion to the whole
piece in this section. Conclusions are drawn
based on your analysis.
Did not discuss
implications of the
findings and/or areas for
further research.
Implications of the findings and/or areas for
further research were discussed.
Format: APA format. The reference page
contains a bibliographic list of the sources
of information you used and cited in your
paper.
Conclusions
References
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
Format: APA format not
present.
Requirements are
partially well addressed
but not all information is
fully explained or
supported.
5%
3%
1%
Conclusions are drawn based on your
analysis.
You discuss implications of the findings
and/or areas for further research.
Format: APA format.
Requirements are fairly
well addressed but not all
information is fully
explained or supported.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
3%
2%
1%
The reference page contains a bibliographic
list of the sources of
information you used and cited in your
paper. References in APA format.
The reference page does
not contain a
bibliographic list of the
sources of information
used and cited in your
paper. References in APA
format.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
5%
3%
1%
Rubric for Research Project Paper.
Dimensions
Competent
Introduction
The introduction includes a statement of the
problem and briefly explains the
Significance of your topic study and acts to
introduce the reader to your definitions and
background.
Needs Improvement
Unacceptable
The introduction does not
include the problem.
No introduction.
2%
Body
The body of the paper summarizes the
findings of studies that have been conducted
on the topic. Briefly explained the purpose,
procedure for data collection and major
findings.
Demonstrates full knowledge of the topic.
Provides clear explanations of all elements
of the topic. Information is well-organized.
Points flow nicely in logical consistency.
Supports the conclusions/ideas with
evidence from the text. Provides both
positive and negative aspects of the topic.
1%
The body of the paper
does not summarize the
findings of studies that
have been conducted on
the topic and does not
explain the purpose,
procedure for data
collection and major
findings.
0%
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
Information appears to be
disorganized.
Presentation is difficult to
understand.
Does not demonstrate full
knowledge of the topic.
Clear explanations of
some elements of the
topic were not provided.
Information is organized.
flows well, occasionally
out the points. Supports
the conclusions/ideas
with some evidence from
the text. Provides some
positive and negative
aspects of the topic.
5%
3%
1%
Discussion
The discussion summarizes the body of the
paper and highlights the most important
findings (in your opinion).
The discussion did not
summarize the body of
the paper.
There is a sense of completion to the whole
piece in this section. Conclusions are drawn
based on your analysis.
Did not discuss
implications of the
findings and/or areas for
further research.
Implications of the findings and/or areas for
further research were discussed.
Format: APA format. The reference page
contains a bibliographic list of the sources
of information you used and cited in your
paper.
Conclusions
References
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
Format: APA format not
present.
Requirements are
partially well addressed
but not all information is
fully explained or
supported.
5%
3%
1%
Conclusions are drawn based on your
analysis.
You discuss implications of the findings
and/or areas for further research.
Format: APA format.
Requirements are fairly
well addressed but not all
information is fully
explained or supported.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
3%
2%
1%
The reference page contains a bibliographic
list of the sources of
information you used and cited in your
paper. References in APA format.
The reference page does
not contain a
bibliographic list of the
sources of information
used and cited in your
paper. References in APA
format.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
5%
3%
1%
Rubric for Literature Review
Dimensions
Competent
Needs Improvement
Unacceptable
Introduction
The introduction includes a
statement of the problem, and the
PICOT question briefly explains
the
The introduction does not
include the problem only
the PICOT question.
No introduction and no
PICOT question.
2%
1%
0%
The body of the literature review
summarizes the findings of studies
that have been conducted on the
topic. For at least 3 studies you
have briefly explained the purpose,
procedure for data collection and
major findings.
The body of the literature
review does not
summarize the findings of
studies that have been
conducted on the topic
for at least 3 studies and
does not explain the
purpose, procedure for
data collection and major
findings.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
5%
3%
1%
Significance of your topic study
and acts to introduce the reader to
your definitions and background.
Body
Discussion
The discussion summarizes the
body of your literature review and
highlights the most important
findings (in your opinion). There
is a sense of completion to the
whole piece in this section.
Conclusions are drawn based on
your analysis.
You discuss implications of the
findings and/or areas for further
research.
Format: APA format. The
reference page contains a
bibliographic list of the sources of
information you used and cited in
your paper.
Conclusions
The discussion did not
summarize the body of
your literature review.
Did not discuss
implications of the
findings and/or areas for
further research.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
Format: APA format not
present.
Requirements are fairly
well addressed but not all
information is fully
explained or supported.
5%
3%
1%
Conclusions are drawn based on
your analysis.
Requirements are fairly
well addressed but not all
information is fully
explained or supported.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
3%
2%
1%
The reference page contains a
bibliographic list of the sources of
information you used and cited in
your paper. References in APA
format.
The reference page does
not contain a
bibliographic list of the
sources of information
used and cited in your
paper. References in APA
format.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
5%
3%
1%
You discuss implications of the
findings and/or areas for further
research.
Format: APA format.
References
Rubric for Scholarly Project Paper.
Dimensions
Competent
Introduction
The introduction includes a statement of the
problem and briefly explains the
Significance of your topic study and acts to
introduce the reader to your definitions and
background.
Needs Improvement
Unacceptable
The introduction does not
include the problem.
No introduction.
2%
Body
The body of the paper summarizes the
findings of studies that have been conducted
on the topic. Briefly explained the purpose,
procedure for data collection and major
findings.
Demonstrates full knowledge of the topic.
Provides clear explanations of all elements
of the topic. Information is well-organized.
Points flow nicely in logical consistency.
Supports the conclusions/ideas with
evidence from the text. Provides both
positive and negative aspects of the topic.
1%
The body of the paper
does not summarize the
findings of studies that
have been conducted on
the topic and does not
explain the purpose,
procedure for data
collection and major
findings.
0%
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
Information appears to be
disorganized.
Presentation is difficult to
understand.
Does not demonstrate full
knowledge of the topic.
Clear explanations of
some elements of the
topic were not provided.
Information is organized.
flows well, occasionally
out the points. Supports
the conclusions/ideas
with some evidence from
the text. Provides some
positive and negative
aspects of the topic.
5%
3%
1%
Discussion
The discussion summarizes the body of the
paper and highlights the most important
findings (in your opinion).
The discussion did not
summarize the body of
the paper.
There is a sense of completion to the whole
piece in this section. Conclusions are drawn
based on your analysis.
Did not discuss
implications of the
findings and/or areas for
further research.
Implications of the findings and/or areas for
further research were discussed.
Format: APA format. The reference page
contains a bibliographic list of the sources
of information you used and cited in your
paper.
Conclusions
References
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
Format: APA format not
present.
Requirements are
partially well addressed
but not all information is
fully explained or
supported.
5%
3%
1%
Conclusions are drawn based on your
analysis.
You discuss implications of the findings
and/or areas for further research.
Format: APA format.
Requirements are fairly
well addressed but not all
information is fully
explained or supported.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
3%
2%
1%
The reference page contains a bibliographic
list of the sources of
information you used and cited in your
paper. References in APA format.
The reference page does
not contain a
bibliographic list of the
sources of information
used and cited in your
paper. References in APA
format.
Requirements are
minimally addressed;
information is unclear
and/or not welldeveloped.
5%
3%
1%
MSN5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease
Case Study Rubric
Criteria
Ideas,
Arguments,
& Analysis
Unsatisfactory-Beginning
0-30 points
Ideas expressed lack an
understanding of the case
study. Comments are
irrelevant, off-topic, and/or
confusing to follow.
Viewpoint, if given, is not
supported with evidence or
examples.
Developing
35-39 points
Ideas expressed in case
study show a minimal
understanding of the topic.
Comments are general in
nature and/or occasionally
may not be relevant.
Rehashes or summarizes
ideas with limited analysis,
original thought, and/or
supported viewpoints.
Connection
to Course
Materials
0-13 points
No connections are made
to readings or other course
materials (lectures, media,
resources, etc.), and/or if
made, are not clearly
stated and are largely
personal opinions.
0-13 points
The case study response
displays a lack of
comprehension of the
assignment.
14-15 points
Minimal direct connections
are made to readings and/or
other course materials
(lectures, media, resources,
etc.). Connections are
largely inferred and
somewhat unclear at times.
14-15 points
The case study responses
are partially addressed.
There are components of
the assignment not
addressed.
Content and
Pedagogical
Knowledge
Accomplished
Exemplary
40-44 points
45-50 points
Ideas expressed in case
Ideas expressed in case
study are mostly substantive study include original
and relevant to topic; some
thought, substantial
original thought.
depth, and are relevant to
Demonstrates logical
topic. Responses show
thinking, reasoning, and/or
strong logical thinking,
analysis for most part.
reasoning, and analysis
Viewpoint is supported with with evidence and
evidence and/or examples.
examples. Construction of
new meaning and insights
are evident.
16-17 points
18-20 points
Some direct connections are Strong, direct connections
made to readings and/or
are made to readings
other course materials
and/or other course
(lectures, media, resources, materials (lectures, media,
etc.) and are clearly stated
resources, etc.) and are
for the most part.
clearly stated.
16-17 points
The case study response
demonstrates
comprehension of
assignment expectations,
however, is missing
responses to some of the
case study questions.
18-20 points
The case study response
demonstrates
comprehension of
assignment expectations
and includes the essential
components of the
assignment.
Total
/50
/20
/20
1
Case Study Rubric (continued)
Criteria
Writing
Quality
Unsatisfactory-Beginning
0-6 points
Responses to case study
show a below average/poor
writing style that lacks
standard English, and/or is
difficult for readers to
follow. Contains frequent
errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and
spelling.
Developing
7 points
Responses to case study
show an average and/or
casual writing style using
standard English that is
generally clear but contains
some errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and
spelling.
Accomplished
8 points
Responses to case study
show above average writing
style that is clear using
standard English with minor
errors in grammar,
punctuation, usage, and/or
spelling.
Exemplary
9-10 points
Responses to case study
are well written and
clearly articulated using
standard English,
characterized by elements
of a strong writing style
with correct grammar,
punctuation, usage, and
spelling.
TOTAL POINTS (sum of Criteria)
Total
/10
/100
Source: Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design/Technology Services, SC&I, Rutgers, 3/2014
2
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
