Description
please see the attached pdf for the following instructions……….
Unformatted Attachment Preview
CIS360 – Systems Analysis I
Unit 1 Assignment: The Corporate Culture Factor
Due Date: 11:59 pm EST day of Unit 1
Points: 100
Overview:
Corporate culture is taking a serious look at how they promote diversity and inclusion.
Research the internet about the corporate cultures of three leading technology
companies (example in Figure 1.27 of your text). Compare each statement of values
and describe the type of employees you think each company is desires. Analyze their
approach toward diversity.
Instructions:
•
•
Provide a comparative analysis of all three organizations you observed.
When you analyze their statements, try to see if they reflect the diversity. If not,
explain your recommendations to those organizations to be more diverse and
inclusive, keeping in mind the position of a system analyst and the key attributes
to make someone successful in this position.
Requirements:
•
•
•
Submit a Word document in APA format.
At least two double-spaced pages in length, excluding reference page(s). No
cover page necessary.
At least two resources.
Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 1 Assignment
CRITERIA
Introduction
Deficient
0 – 5 points
The introduction is
missing or poorly
written.
Needs
Improvement
6 – 7 points
The introduction is
missing key details.
Proficient
Exemplary
8 – 9 points
The introduction is
missing minor
details.
10 points
The introduction is
thoughtfully wellwritten and gives a
summary of the
paper.
15 points
The comparative
analysis is logical,
complete, and
thorough.
The three
recommendations
are well thought out
and logical in
increasing diversity
and inclusion.
20 points
The role of the
systems analyst is
clearly laid out and
logical for the
organization and
recommendation.
10 points
The conclusion is
well written and
wraps up the paper.
More than 2
resources.
0 – 8 points
The comparative
analysis is missing
or poorly written.
9 – 11 points
The comparative
analysis is missing
key details.
12 – 14 points
The comparative
analysis is missing
minor details.
The three
recommendations
are missing or
poorly written.
The three
recommendations
are missing key
details.
The three
recommendations
are missing minor
details.
0 – 11 points
The role of the
systems analyst is
missing or poorly
written.
12 – 15 points
The role of the
systems analyst is
missing key details.
16 – 19 points
The role of the
systems analyst is
missing minor
details.
0 – 5 points
The conclusion is
missing or poorly
written.
0-1 resource.
6 – 7 points
The conclusion is
missing key details.
n/a
8 – 9 points
The conclusion is
missing minor
details.
2 resources.
Paper Length
Less than two
pages.
n/a
Two pages.
Clear and
Professional
Writing and APA
Format
Errors impede
professional
presentation;
guidelines not
followed.
Significant errors
that do not impede
professional
presentation.
Few errors that do
not impede
professional
presentation.
Comparative
analysis on the
three
organizations
Three
recommendations
(one for each
organization) to
increase diversity
and inclusion
The system
analyst’s role in
being successful
Conclusion
Resources
More than two
pages.
Writing and format
are clear,
professional, APA
compliant, and errorfree.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
