Description
read the file below and solve the repor, please follow the instruction and the guidlines
Unformatted Attachment Preview
ASSESSMENT BRIEF 2023-2024
Programme: B.Sc. (Hons.) Facilities Management & Construction Project Management
Module Code/Module Title: OM 2092 Laws for the Built Environment and Procurement
Module Tutor: Azza Humaid Al Saaidi
Assessment Title/ Number: Course work- Report based on case studies/Essay
Date of Issue: Sunday, 08th October, 2023
Date of Submission: Monday, 25th December, 2023
(Tick in the appropriate box)
You are encouraged to word process your assessment, although hand
written work is acceptable.
You are required to word process this assessment.
You are required to submit this assessment electronically through Web CT
Instructions:
This paper contains 2 questions/tasks.
Answer the question/complete the tasks fully with all possible evidence for
achieving the learning outcome/s.
Answer in about 2000 words.
This assessment is worth 50% of the module mark.
Please do not submit this assessment brief with your work.
ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET 2023-2024
Programme:
BSc (Hons) Facilities Management
Module Title/Module Code:
OM 2092 Laws for the Built Environment and Procurement
Student Name:
UCLan ID:
25th December, 2023
Date of Submission:
I confirm that this piece of work which I have
submitted is all my own work and that
references and quotations from both primary
and secondary sources have been fully
identified and properly acknowledged. I am
fully aware that plagiarism and collusion are
academic offences.
__________
Mark in Percentage:
I also confirm that I have not used translation
services or translation software in the
production of this assignment.
Student’s signature:
Date:
Please note the following penalties for late
submission:
Date of Submission
Max. Mark
1-5 working days late
40%
More than 5 working days
late
0%
1st Marker
Name:
2nd Marker*
Name:
UCLan Verification
Name:
External
Initials
Name:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Examiner
* 2nd Marking on sample basis.
Please note that all marks are provisional subject to confirmation by the Module Assessment
Board of the University of Central Lancashire, UK.
1. Diwan of Royal Court (DRC) proposes a plan to construct a housing unit in the state of AL
Musannah and AL Suwaiq, to help the people whose homes were destroyed due to the
Shaheen Cyclone. DRC plans to contract out this project to eligible contractors.
As the Contracts and Procurement Manager in the company, carry out the following tasks:
A. Recommend an appropriate procurement system of the project. Justify your selection
appropriately.
B. Suggest a suitable method of selecting the tendering contractors for your project.
Explain your choice with suitable justification.
C. Suggest a suitable method of payment to the contractor. Explain your choice with
suitable justification.
D. Explain the roles and responsibilities under JCT 2005 of the following parties:
i)
Clients/ Employer
ii)
Architect’s
iii)
Main Contractors
[60 Marks]
2. Prepare a contract of work for Dr. Noor Salim Mohammed AL Habsi who has been
appointed as a General Manager in Natural Gas Department in Oman LNG. Assume all
necessary details.
[30 Marks]
3. Grammar, neatness of formatting and presentation of work.
For referencing follow Harvard Referencing booklet and provide in-text citations. Use Font
Arial, size 11.
[10 Marks]
Instructions:
Penalties for Over-length Assignments
Assignment briefs will include clear instructions about word counts. Students are
expected to adhere to the word count requirements for each assessment. If students
exceed these word count limits, they may receive a reduction in marks as follows.
For written assignments that exceed a word count limit by
0-10% – no penalty
+>10.1% – 20% : 2.5% reduction in mark
+>20.1% – 30% : 5% reduction in mark
+>30.1% – 40% : 7.5% reduction in mark
+>40.1% – 50% : 10% reduction in mark
+>50.1% – 60% : 12.5% reduction in mark
+>60.1% – 70% : 15% reduction in mark
+>70.1% – 80% : 17.5% reduction in mark
+>80.1% – 90% : 20% reduction in mark
+>90.1% – 100% : 22.5% reduction in mark
>100%: 25% reduction in mark but no student will fail an assessment
because of a penalty for exceeding the word limit.
Academic Misconduct
Unfair means (which includes cheating, plagiarism, collusion, re- presentation or using
Artificial Intelligence to prepare assignments).
Cheating is any deliberate attempt to deceive and covers a range of offences
described in the ICEM Policy on Unfair Means to Enhance Performance. Cheating
may include any technique intentionally misused by students in the submitted reports
such as intended misuse of quotation marks, using hidden quotes, hidden characters
and replaced characters.
Plagiarism describes copying from the works of another person without suitably
attributing the published or unpublished works of others.
Collusion is an attempt to deceive the examiners by concealing the true authorship of
the student’s work by copying, or imitating another student’s work in detail. This
includes copying other student’s consent with his/her consent. It also includes when
2 or more students divide the elements of an assignment amongst themselves and
copy one another’s answers.
Using technological aids and Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, without specific
authorization is considered academic misconduct.
Re-presentation is an attempt to gain credit twice for the same piece of work.
Fabrication is making up research data or results and reporting the same.
Falsification is manipulating the research data or results such that inaccurate
information is reported.
Academic penalty:
1. For the first time: the penalty will be 0% for the element of assessment, the
plagiarized element of assessment must be resubmitted to the required standard and
the mark for the module following resubmission will be restricted to the minimum
pass mark (i.e. 40%).
2. In the event of a repeat offence of cheating, plagiarism, collusion or re-presentation
on the same or any other module within the course; the appropriate penalty will be
0% for the module with no opportunity for reassessment and you will have to retake
the module in a subsequent year.
Artificial Intelligence Guidance
Artificial Intelligence (AI) will breach the academic regulations when: “Using technological
aids and AI, including translation software, paraphrasing tools, text generating software
(essay bots), and tools to generate graphics or artworks, without specific authorisation.”
(source QAA April
Initial Key Principles for Students on the use of Artificial Intelligence
Using AI under the tutor’s guidance will be acceptable in certain situations but
students need to ensure that they comply with the academic regulations on
Academic Integrity.
Ensure the use of the AI tool is in line with the assessment brief and any further
advice from the tutor setting the assignment.
Do not rely solely on AI tools to complete assignments. Use AI tools to enhance your
work, not as a replacement for it.
Acknowledge the extent to which AI has been used as part of referencing their
sources, clarifying the contribution of AI to make clear what is their own work.
Students have to cite AI tool they used (such as ChatGPT) and describe how they
used it.
Avoid assuming that AI responses are always accurate. AI-generated information
may sometimes be inaccurate or misleading.
Keep drafts to evidence the thinking and development of the work if requested.
Students may be asked to respond to questions to test their knowledge of their
assessed work.
Failure to follow this advice may lead to allegations of academic misconduct and will
impact students’ ability to defend themselves.
Marking Criteria
Question
1
Marking criteria
Choice of an appropriate procurement method of the
project.
Range of information included to explain selected
method with suitable justification.
Choice of an appropriate method of selection the
tendering contractors.
Range of information included to explain selected
method with suitable justification
Choice of a suitable method of payment to the
contractor.
Range of information included to explain the method
of payment to contractor with suitable justification.
Clarity of explaining the duties and responsibilities of
Clients/ Employer
Clarity of explaining the duties and responsibilities of
Architect’s
Clarity of explaining the duties and responsibilities of
Main Contractors
2
Total
Range and
relevance of terms and conditions
identified and presented in the contract
Logic in the assumptions made for salary, leaves,
and other benefits provided
Creativity, originality and general presentation of
agreement in terms of format and grammar
English language, neatness of formatting and
presentation of work
Referencing as per Havard system and providing intext citations for the report
Maximum
Total
Marks
marks
4
10
4
10
4
10
60
Marks
6
6
6
15
10
30
Marks
5
5
5
10
Marks
100
Marks
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
