Description
I will only accept bid with 3 hours for this wirk
Unformatted Attachment Preview
This assessment addresses the following learning objective(s):
•
Examine the effect of legal, ethical, and regulatory processes on nursing practices
(and/or change to providers), healthcare delivery, and outcomes while maintaining
balance with administrative and fiscal responsibilities.
Instructions
The healthcare industry is made up of diverse people and teams. This includes
individuals who create policies, groups who lobby for legislation, and the people and
teams who implement and follow laws and policies. For this assignment, you will reflect
on your role, past, present, and future, regarding health policies. While research is
encouraged for this assignment, in-text citations are not necessary. The purpose of this
assignment is to provide your instructor with your knowledge framework and allow you
to reflect on your knowledge and identify biases.
In an introductory paragraph, briefly summarize your scope of knowledge regarding
health policy, both state/federal, and organizational policies.
In a second paragraph, explain why you wish to develop a deeper understanding of the
policy creation, implementation, and assessment process. For example, how will
understanding health policy improve your professional practice?
In a closing paragraph, address the following questions:
•
•
•
•
What biases/strong opinions do you have regarding health policy (state, federal,
organizational policies)?
What caused those biases/opinions to develop (personal experiences, patient
interactions, etc.)?
How will you respectfully maintain or evolve your bias/opinions as you advance in
this course, and your career?
What is your primary source of information for staying up-to-date on state and
federal health policy (names of publications, websites, organization-disseminated
information, etc.)?
APA style should be followed throughout this assignment. Please include a title page.
Research is encouraged, but references and in-text citations are not required.
Submit
Word document
Assignment Resource(s)
N/A
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Rubric
HA610 Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework (1)
HA610 Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework (1)
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeContent
& Concepts
15 pts
Level 5
Ideas and
concepts are
consistently clear
and always well
explained.
Relationships
between concepts
and ideas are
always discussed
fairly and always
synthesized in a
logical fashion
with strong, wellfounded
supporting
arguments. All
discussion and
arguments are
thoroughly
supported with
research and/or
resource
materials that are
pertinent, valid,
and reliable.
13.5 pts
Level 4
Ideas and
concepts are
clear and well
explained.
Relationships
between
concepts and
ideas are
discussed fairly
and synthesized
in a logical
fashion with
well-founded
supporting
arguments.
Discussion and
arguments are
supported with
research and/or
resource
materials that are
pertinent, valid,
and reliable.
12 pts
Level 3
Ideas and
concepts are
reasonably well
explained.
Discussion and
arguments are,
for the most
part, supported
with research
and/or resource
materials that
are pertinent,
valid, and
reliable
relationships
between
concepts, and
ideas are
discussed.
These could be
further
strengthened
with additional
research or
resource
materials.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Basic ideas and
concepts are
presented;
however, they are
underdeveloped
and poorly
explained. There is
minimal evidence
of a relationship
between ideas and
concepts.
Discussion and
arguments are not
supported with
additional research
or research that is
pertinent and
valid.
9 pts
Level 1
Some basic
ideas and
concepts are
started, but
not
developed.
There is no
identifiable
relationship
between ideas
and concepts.
There is little
or no
discussion
and/or
argument
with
supporting
research.
0 pt
Lev
The
no
dev
idea
con
The
sup
rese
HA610 Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework (1)
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeAnalysis
Ratings
15 pts
Level 5
Organizes and
synthesizes
evidence to
reveal insightful
patterns,
differences, or
similarities
related to focus.
13.5 pts
Level 4
Organizes and
analyzes
evidence to
reveal insightful
patterns,
differences, or
similarities
related to focus.
12 pts
Level 3
Organizes
evidence to
reveal important
patterns,
differences, or
similarities
related to focus.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Organizes
evidence, but the
organization is not
effective in
revealing
important
patterns,
differences, or
similarities.
9 pts
Level 1
Describes
evidence, but
it is not
organized
and/or is
unrelated to
focus.
0 pts
Level
Lists
evide
but it
organ
and/o
unrel
focus
HA610 Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework (1)
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeWriting
Conventions
10 pts
Level 5
The paper
exhibits a
superior
command of
written
English
language
conventions.
The paper has
no errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling.
9 pts
Level 4
The paper
exhibits a
stronger
command of
written English
language
conventions. The
paper has no
errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
impair the flow
of
communication.
8 pts
Level 3
The paper
exhibits a
command of
written English
language
conventions. The
paper has minor
errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
impact the flow
of
communication.
7 pts
Level 2
The paper
exhibits a limited
command of
written English
language
conventions. The
paper has
frequent errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
impede the flow
of
communication.
6 pts
Level 1
The paper
exhibits little
command of
written
English
language
conventions.
The paper has
errors in
mechanics,
grammar, or
spelling that
cause the
reader to stop
and reread
parts of the
writing to
discern
meaning.
0 pts
Level
The pa
does n
demon
comma
written
English
langua
conven
The pa
multip
errors
mecha
gramm
spellin
cause t
reader
difficu
discern
meanin
HA610 Unit 1 Assignment – Knowledge Framework (1)
Criteria
This criterion is
linked to a
Learning
OutcomeAPA
PRICE-I
Total Points: 50
PreviousNext
Ratings
10 pts
Level
The required
APA elements
are all included
with correct
formatting,
including intext citations
and references.
9 pts
Level 4
The required
APA elements
are all
included with
minor
formatting
errors,
including intext citations
and references.
8 pts
Level 3
The required
APA elements
are all included
with multiple
formatting
errors,
including intext citations
and references.
7 pts
Level 2
The required
APA elements
are not all
included and/or
there are major
formatting
errors,
including intext citations
and references.
6 pts
Level 1
Several APA
elements are
missing. The errors
in formatting
demonstrate a
limited
understanding of
APA guidelines, intext-citations, and
references.
0 pts
Level 0
There i
to no e
of APA
format
and/or
are no
citation
and/or
referen
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
